Developing, testing, and using theoretical models for promoting quality in education

References

• Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2013). A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: Impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behaviour and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2008). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in Head Start REDI program. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 821–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 599–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., & Fullan, M. (2007). Collaboration and partnership for equitable improvement: Towards a networked learning system? School Leadership & Management, 27, 207–211.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-bases management: A mechanism for development. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christoforidou, M. (2013). Teacher professional development in classroom assessment: Using the dynamic model of educational effectiveness to improve assessment practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cyprus, Nicosia.
   Google Scholar
• Christoforidou, M., & Xirafidou, E. (in press). Using the dynamic model to identify stages of teacher skills in assessment. Journal of Classroom Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. (2009). School improvement: Reality and illusion. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57, 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery, and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins J. B., & Earl L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2009). Situational effects of the school factors included in the dynamic model of educational effectiveness. South African Journal of Education, 29, 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2010a). Explaining stability and changes in school effectiveness by looking at changes in the functioning of school factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 409–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2010b). Using the dynamic model to develop an evidence-based and theory-driven approach to school improvement. Irish Educational Studies, 29, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). Improving quality in education: Dynamic approaches to school improvement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). The impact of school self-evaluation upon student achievement: A group randomisation study. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domitrovich, C. E., Gest, S. D., Gill, S., Bierman, K. L., Welsh, J. A., & Jones, D. J. (2009). Fostering high-quality teaching with an enriched curriculum and professional development support: The Head Start REDI program. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 567–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations: Foundations for organisational science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Golby, M., & Viant, R., (2007). Means and ends in professional development. Teacher Development, 11, 237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving school: Performance and potential. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Wilcox, B. (1995). Good school, bad school: Evaluating performance and encouraging improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 377–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H., & Gray, J. M. (2010). Institutional contexts and international performances in schooling: Comparing patterns and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education, 45, 153–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. (2008). Testing the validity of the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: A step towards the development of a dynamic model of effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Archambault, I., & Janosz, M. (2013). Searching for stages of effective teaching: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model in Canada. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 48(2), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Campbell, R. J. (2004). School self-evaluation and school improvement: A critique of values and procedures. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2009). The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: Two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education, 1, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., Antoniou, P., & Demetriou, D. (2010). A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 807–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., Muijs, D., Rekers-Mombarg, L., Papastylianou, D., Van Petegem, P., & Pearson, D. (2013). Using the dynamic model of educational effectiveness to design strategies and actions to face bullying. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.771686
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., Papastylianou, D., & Papadatou-Pastou, M. (2013). Improving the school learning environment to reduce bullying: An experimental study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00313831.2013.773556
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., & Hsiao, S. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: A replication series across clusters of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 203–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for students. Bergen: University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Panayiotou, A., Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., McMahon, L., Vanlaar, G., Pfeifer, M., & Bren, M. (2013, April – May). Teacher behavior and student outcomes: Results of a European study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (2006). World class schools: Some methodological and substantive findings and implications of the International School Effectiveness Research Project (ISERP). Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 535–560.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (2009). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2013). The use of theory in school effectiveness research revisited. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment and monitoring: A systemic approach. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. M., & Replogle, E. (1996). Challenges in evaluating school-linked services: Toward a more comprehensive evaluation framework. Evaluation Review, 20, 424–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 839–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., & Hatton, N. (1992, November). Towards reflection in teacher education. What counts as evidence? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Sprinthall, A. N., Reiman, J. A., & Sprinthall, T. L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, J. T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 666–703). New York, NY: Association of Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Visscher, A. J., & Coe, R. (2002). School improvement through performance feedback. Rotterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Garet, M., Birman, B., & Jacobson, R. (2007). Examining the effects of mathematics and science professional development on teachers’ instructional practice: Using professional development activity log. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar