Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review

References

• Aikin, W. M. (1942). The story of the eight year study. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Alsbury, T. L. (2008). The future of school board governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Brown, M., William, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. London: King’s College London, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beare, H. (1997). Enterprise: The new metaphor for schooling in a post-industrial society. In T. Townsend (Ed.), The primary school in changing times: The Australian experience (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belfi, B., Goos, M., Pinxten, M., Verhaeghe, J. P., Gielen, S., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2013). Inequality in language achievement growth? An investigation into the impact of pupil socio-ethnic background and school socio-ethnic composition. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:n.1002/brj.3115
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1968). Education cannot compensate for society. New Society, 387, 344–347.
   Google Scholar
• Bisschoff, T., & Rhodes, C. (2011). Good schools for some but why not better schools for all? Sub-Saharan Africa in transition. In C. Day (Ed.), International handbook on teacher and school development (pp. 901–924). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borich, G. (1996). Effective teaching methods (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, R., & Scheerens, J. (1994). Alternative models of school effectiveness put to the test. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bosker, R. J. (2011, January). From educational effectiveness to evidence based education. Keynote address presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Limassol.
   Google Scholar
• Bosker, R. J., & Van der Velden, R. K. W. (1989). The effects of schools on the educational career of disadvantaged pupils. In B. P. M. Creemers & D. Reynolds (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress for School Effectiveness, Rotterdam (pp. 141–155). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsma, H. P., & Knuver, J. W. M. (1988). Organisatorische verschillen tussen basisscholen en hun effect op leerlingprestaties [Organisational differences between primary schools and their effects on pupil achievement]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 13, 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Brookover, W., & Lezotte, C. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–376). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. L., III (1999). Multilevel examination of student, school, and district-level effects on academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Developing a differentiated model. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.-K., & Rudowicz, E. (2003). Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrispeels, J. (1992). Purposeful restructuring. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. (2009). Sustainability and improvement: A problem “of” education and “for” education. Improving Schools, 12, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., Kyriakides, L., Bren, M., Panayiotou, A., Holtappels, H. G., Van Damme, J., … Tempridou, A. (2013, January). Establishing a knowledge-base for quality education: Testing a dynamic theory of educational effectiveness. Symposium conducted at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Santiago.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., Kyriakides, L., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in school effectiveness research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 121–153.
   Google Scholar
• Day C., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Regan, E., Ko J., Brown E., … Robertson, D. (2008). Effective classroom practice (ECP): A mixed-method study of influences and outcomes (Report submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council RES-000-23-1564). Nottingham: School of Education, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E. J., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). Successful school leadership: Linking with learning. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting work, lives and effectiveness. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Stobart, G., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., & Mutjuba, T. (2006). Variation in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness (VITAE). Nottingham: DCFS.
   Google Scholar
• De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 132–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolaard, S. (2002). Stability and change in results of schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 773–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, G. (2002). School composition and achievement in primary education: A large-scale multilevel approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 347–368.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L. (1995). The school that refused to die: Continuity and change at Thomas Jefferson High School. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumay, X. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of schools’ culture for student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 523–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2007). Accounting for class effect using the TIMSS 2003 8th grade database: Net effect of group composition, net effect of class processes and joint effect. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 383–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2008). Does the school composition effect matter? Evidence from Belgian data. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 440–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, X., & Galand, B. (2012). The multilevel impact of transformational leadership on teacher commitment: Cognitive and motivational pathways. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 703–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36, 90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy, P. (2013, February). Effective schools in reading, mathematics and science. Presentation of results at TIMSS & PIRLS 2011 Joint National Research Coordinators Meeting, Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, T. E., & Franeschini, L. A. (2007). The state of the American school superintendency. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel models in educational and social research (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Thomas, S. (1996). Using examination results as indicators of school and college performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 159, 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Reynolds, D., Fitz-Gibbon, C., & Jesson, D. (1996). Merging traditions: The future of research on school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Grisay, A. (1996). Evolution des acquis cognitifs et socio-affectifs des eleves au cours des annees de college [Cognitive and socio-affective development during the years in the middle school]. Liège: Université de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Guldemond, H., & Bosker, R. (2009). School effects on students’ progress – a dynamic perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 255–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E. (2007). Understanding causal influences on educational achievement through analysis of differences over time within countries. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Lessons learned: What international assessments tell us about math achievement (pp. 37–63). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. (1999). Some findings from the independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, R., & Tymms, P. (2004). The effects of student composition on school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Russ, J., & Stoll, L. (2006). Improving schools in challenging contexts: Exploring the possible. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., & Redding, S. (2008). Turning around chronically low performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE # 2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1998). Modelling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 310–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C. (2011). Overlooking the descent: Operational definition, identification, and description of school decline. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 459–475.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J., & De Leeuw, E. D. (2003). Multilevel models for meta-analysis. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 78–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C. S., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., … Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of the family and schooling in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, C., Park, C., & Lee, M.-J. (2007). Effects of ability mixing in high school on adulthood earnings: Quasi-experimental evidence from South Korea. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 269–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (2009). Education choice and schooling theory: Adapting Sen’s early work on “capability” to choice and sustainability (Unpublished paper). University of Southampton, Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J. (2002). Evaluation of well-being in schools: A multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. (2008). Testing the validity of the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: A step towards the development of a dynamic model of effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2009). The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: Two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education, 1, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72, 229–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie, G. (2009). The complexity of school and neighbourhood effects and movements of pupils on school differences in models of educational achievement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172, 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten, H. (2006). An empirical assessment of the absolute effect of schooling: Regression-discontinuity applied to TIMSS-95. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 397–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., Peschar, J., & Coe, R. (2008). Effects of schooling on reading performance, reading engagement and reading activities of 15-year-olds in England. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., Schildkamp, K., & Folmer, E. (2009). Cognitive development in Dutch primary education, the impact of individual background and classroom composition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 265–283.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., Tymms, P., & Jones, P. (2009). Assessing school effects without controlling for prior achievement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: From a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 249–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., & Mortimore, P. (2001). Improving school effectiveness. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mangan, J., Pugh, G., & Gray, J. (2005). Changes in examination performance in English secondary schools over the course of a decade: Searching for patterns and trends over time. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2011). Patterns of multilevel variance in psycho-educational phenomena: Comparing motivation engagement, climate and achievement factors. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 25, 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2007). Leadership and school reform factors. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 597–614). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Waters, T. (2009). District leadership that works. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D. M., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. S. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P. (1991). School effectiveness research: Which way at the crossroads? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books (Reprinted in 1995, London: Paul Chapman).
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. (2006). New directions for school effectiveness research: Towards school effectiveness without schools. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 149–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2003). Student background and teacher effects on achievement and attainment in mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Effective teaching: Research and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Murnane, R. J. (1981). Interpreting the evidence on school effectiveness. Teachers College Record, 83, 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2003). Is the school composition effect real? A discussion with evidence from the UK PISA data. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14, 441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., Van Damme, J., De Fraine, B., Van Landeghem, G., & Onghena, P. (2002). The effect of schools and classes on mathematics achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 399–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palardy, G. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 21–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• PISA-Konsortium Deutschland. (2006). PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [Research on the development of competencies during one school year]. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Pustjens, H., Van de gaer, E., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2004). Effect of secondary schools on academic choices and on success in higher education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 281–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. (2011, March). Modelling mediation – causes, markers and mechanisms. Opening address of the Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, T. (1991). Hierarchical linear modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, T. (2002). Hierarchical linear modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (1976). The delinquent school. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), The process of schooling (pp. 78–95). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (Ed.). (1996). Country reports from Australia, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(2), 111–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (2007). Schools learning from their best – the within school variation project. Nottingham: NCSL.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (2008). New Labour, education and Wales: The devolution decade. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 753–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (2010a). Failure free education? The past, present and future of school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. (2010b). Smart school improvement: Towards schools learning from their best. In M. Fullan, A. Hargreaves, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), The international handbook of educational change (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Bollen, R., Creemers, B. P. M., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L., & Lagerweij, N. (1996). Making good schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, E. (2002). World class schools: International perspectives in school effectiveness. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., Schaffer, E., & Nesselrodt, P. S. (1994). Advances in school effectiveness research and practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., Potter, D., & Chapman, C. (2001). School improvement for schools facing challenging circumstances: A review of research and practice. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., & Stoll, L. (1993). Linking school effectiveness knowledge and school improvement practice: Towards synergy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (1999). Numeracy: An annotated bibliography for schools and colleges. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M., Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., Stringfield, S., Wang, L. W., & Alberg, M. (2001). Two- and three-year achievement results from the Memphis Restructuring Initiative. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 323–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107, 1999–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. ( with Smith, A.). (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. London: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (1996). Complexities in the judgment of school effectiveness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 113–149.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (1999). School effectiveness: Coming of age in the 21st century. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (2008). Zero tolerance of failure and New Labour approaches to school improvement in England. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 651–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (2010a). The contribution of mixed methods to recent research on educational effectiveness. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods research (2nd ed., pp. 697–723). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. (2010b). Equity and educational effectiveness. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Vol. 5, Leadership and management, politics and governance (pp. 51–57). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., & Luyten, H. (Eds.). (2009). Alternative methods for assessing school effects and schooling effects. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(2), 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., & Cuttance, P. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: Results from a reanalysis of the Inner London Education Authority's Junior School project data. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 381–405.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P., & Thomas, S. (1995). Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 285–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Barreau, S., & Grobbe, S. (2008). Effective Pre-School and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE): The influence of school and teacher quality on children’s progress in primary school. Nottingham: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Thomas, S., & Mortimore, P. (1997). Forging links: Effective departments and effective schools. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, E., Nesselrodt, P., & Stringfield, S. (1997). Impediments to reform: An analysis of destabilizing issues in ten promising programs. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Science.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (Ed). (2012). School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta analysis of empirical studies. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of school effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., & Van Ravens, J. (2011) Perspectives on educational quality: Illustrative outcomes on primary and secondary schooling in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T. (2010). The effects of school system superintendents, school boards, and their interactions on longitudinal measures of districts’ students’ mathematics achievement ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J., & Willett, J. (2003). Doing data analysis in the multilevel model for change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (1986). Best evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (2004). Built to last: Long-term maintenance of Success for All. Remedial and Special Education. 25, 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., Wasik, B. A., Ross, S., Smith, L., & Dianda, M. (1996). Success for All: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 41–76.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., & Tomlinson, S. (1989). The school effect: A study of multi-racial comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (1997). Pupil progress during Key Stage 1: A value added analysis of school effects. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 471–487.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2010). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty, and prior achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. (1998). An anatomy of ineffectiveness. In L. Stoll & K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulties (pp. 209–221). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. (2000, April). Results from an eleven-year follow-up from the Louisiana School Effectiveness Study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. (2008). School Boards and raising student outcomes: Reflections (confessions?) of a former urban School Board member. In T. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of School Board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 217–229). Lanham, MD: R & L Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., & Herman, R. (1998). Using “promising programs” to improve educational processes and student outcomes. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1314–1338). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. (2012). Making best practice standard – and lasting. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. C. (2008). Improving secondary students’ academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1988). A time to summarize: The Louisiana School Effectiveness Study. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991). Observers as predictors of schools’ multiyear outlier status on achievement tests. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 357–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2011). School effectiveness research, 1932–2008, including a call for future research. In C. Day (Ed.), International handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 379–388). London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. C., & Yakimowski-Srebnick, M. E. (2005). Promise, progress, problems, and paradoxes of three phases of accountability: A longitudinal case study of the Baltimore City Public Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 43–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Weinbaum, E. H. (Eds.). (2008). The implementation gap. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• TED. (2007). Hans Rosling onhult nieuwe inzichten in armoede [Hans Rosling’s new insights on poverty] [videotape]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_reveals_new_insights_on_poverty.html
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., Creemers, B. P. M., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Yu, F. (2006). The international system for teacher observation and feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 561–582.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Sammons, P. (2010). Applications of mixed methods to the field of educational effectiveness research. In B. P. M. Creemers, L. Kyriakides, & P. Sammons (Eds.), Methodological advances in educational effectiveness Research (pp. 115–152). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (Ed.). (1979). Medical lessons from history. In The medusa and the snail (pp. 131–144). New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of secondary school effectiveness: Comparative analyses across regions. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 285–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Smees, R. (1997a). Differential secondary school effectiveness: Comparing the performance of different pupil groups. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 451–469.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Smees, R. (1997b). Stability and consistency in secondary schools’ effects on students’ GCSE outcomes over three years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 169–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference. Let’s be realistic. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. (1994). Effective schooling for the community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. (Ed.). (2007). The international handbook of school effectiveness and school improvement. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. (2010, November). Thinking and acting both locally and globally: New issues for school development planning. Keynote paper presented to the International Professional Development Association (IPDA) annual conference, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, T., Ainscow, M., & Clarke, P. (Eds.). (1999). Third millennium schools: A world of difference in effectiveness and improvement. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tymms, P., Merrell, C., Heron, T., Jones, P., Albone, S., & Henderson, B. (2008). The importance of districts. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 261–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J., Liu, H., Vanhee, L., & Pustjens, H. (2010). Longitudinal studies at the country level as a new approach to educational effectiveness: Explaining change in reading achievement (PIRLS) by change in age, socio-economic status and class size. Effective Education, 2, 53–84.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J., Opdenakker, M.-C., Van Landeghem, G., De Fraine, B., Pustjens, H., & Van de gaer, E. (2006). Educational effectiveness: An introduction to international and Flemish research on school, teachers and classes. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Van de gaer, E., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., De Munter, A., & Onghena, P. (2009). School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic self-concept in secondary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2004). Effects of single-sex versus coeducational classes and schools on gender differences in progress in language and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49, 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W. (2009). Reliability and validity in measuring the value added of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Slik, F. W. P., Driessen, G. W. J. M., & De Bot, K. L. J. (2006). Ethnic and socio-economic class composition and language proficiency: A longitudinal multilevel examination in Dutch elementary schools. European Sociological review, 22, 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, M., & Waslander, M. (2007). Traditional and non-traditional educational outcomes: Trade-off or complementarity? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Werf, G., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Kuyper, H. (2008). Testing a dynamic model of student and school effectiveness with a multivariate multilevel latent growth curve approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtte, M. (2004). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landeghem, G., Van Damme, J., Opdenakker, M.-C., De Fraine, B., & Onghena, P. (2002). The effect of schools and classes on noncognitive outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verachtert, P., Van Damme, J., Onghena, P., & Ghesquière, P. (2009). A seasonal perspective on school effectiveness: Evidence from a Flemish longitudinal study in kindergarten and first grade. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, J., Van Damme, J., & Knipprath, H. (2011, August). Differences in value added between primary schools with high proportions of minority students: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the Educational Effectiveness SIG at the meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51, 224–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimpelberg, R., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Sensitivity to context: The past and future of effective schools research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 82–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. C., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L. M. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 827–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word, E. (1990). Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee’s K-3 class size study. Final Summary Report 1985–1990. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED320692&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED320692
   Google Scholar
• Wray, D., & Medwell, J. (2001, July). What can teachers of literacy learn from a study of effective teachers? Paper presented at the 12th European Reading conference, Dublin.
   Google Scholar