Setting expectations for good education: how Dutch school inspections drive improvement

References

• Altrichter, H., & Maag Merki, K. (2010). Steuerung der Entwicklung des Schulwesens [Governance of school development]. In H. Altrichter & K. Maag Merki (Eds.), Handbuch Neue Steuerung im Schulsystem (pp. 15–39). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2009). Modeling certainty with clustered data: A comparison of methods. Political Analysis, 17, 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1997). Good school/bad school: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 169–182). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2005). All choices created equal? How good parents select “failing” schools (Working Paper). New York, NY: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries. Higher Education, 40, 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimblecombe, N., Shaw, M., & Ormston, M. (1996). Teachers’ intention to change practice as a result of Ofsted school inspections. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 24, 339–354.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. (2001). Changing classrooms through inspection. School Leadership & Management, 21, 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. (2002). Ofsted and school improvement: Teachers’ perceptions of the inspection process in schools facing challenging circumstances. School Leadership & Management, 22, 257–272.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. (2003). Evidence on the role and impact of performance feedback in schools. In A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds.), School improvement through performance feedback (pp. 27–39). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., De Jong, I., Jakobs, E., & Slot, J. (2012). Het schoolkeuzeproces door de ogen van Amsterdamse ouders [School choice as viewed by parents in Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Bureau Onderzoek en Statistiek.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Walker, S. (1989). Teaching and stress. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system (NBER Working Paper No. 12286). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12286
   Google Scholar
• De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dronkers, J., & Veenstra, R. (2001). Schoolprestatie-indicatoren in het voortgezet onderwijs: Start, reacties en vervolg [School performance indicators in secondary education: Start, responses and follow-up]. In A. B. Dijkstra, S. Karsten, R. Veenstra, & A. J. Visscher (Eds.), Het oog der natie: Scholen op rapport; standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties (pp. 21–36). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools – describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., & Honingh, M. E. (2011). Risk-based school inspections in the Netherlands: A critical reflection on intended effects and causal mechanisms. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2008). The relationships between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 205–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (2001). Characteristics of performative cultures: Their central paradoxes and limitations as resources for educational reform. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 154–168). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2004). Evaluation of schools providing compulsory education in Europe. Retrieved from file:///X:/My%20Downloads/EC3112831ENN_002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2001). Developing teachers in a performance culture – Is performance pay the answer? In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 81–94). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 406–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E., Ehren, M. C. M., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2013). School inspections and school improvement: Testing assumptions on causal mechanisms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. (1995). Inspection and school improvement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25, 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J. S., & Weinstein, J. M. (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1373–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Husfeldt, V. (2011). Wirkungen und wirksamkeit der externen schulevaluation. Überblick zum stand der forschung [Effectiveness of external school evaluation. Overview of research]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14, 259–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C. (1999). Institutional transformation and educational management. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp. 142–153). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, S., & Visscher, A. (2001). Ervaringen met het openbaar maken van schoolprestaties in Engeland en Frankrijk [Good practices of publishing school performance data in England and France]. In A. B. Dijkstra, S. Karsten, R. Veenstra, & A. J. Visscher (Eds.), Het oog der natie: Scholen op rapport; standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties (pp. 36–54). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, S., Visscher, A. J., Dijkstra, A., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Towards standards for the publication of performance indicators in the public sector: The case of schools. Public Administration, 88, 90–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerks, M. (2013). The effect of school inspections: A systematic review. Retrieved from http://schoolinspections.eu/literature-review-effective-school-inspections/
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning, P. W. C., & Van Der Wiel, K. M. (2010). Kwaliteitsinformatie middelbare scholen maakt verschil [Performance indicators about secondary schools make a difference]. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 95, 294–297.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003). Teachers’ responses to high-stakes testing and the validity of gains: A pilot study (CSE Report No. 610). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r610.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kotthoff, H. G., & Böttcher, W. (2010). Neue formen der “Schulinspektion”: Wirkungshoffnungen und Wirksamkeit im Spiegel empirischer Bildungsforschung [New forms of school inspections: Effectiveness from the perspective of empirical research]. In H. Altrichter & K. Maag Merki (Eds.), Handbuch neue Steuerung in Schulsystem (pp. 295–325). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, H. (2005). Evaluation im Bildungssystem [Evaluation in educational systems]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, S., & Schimank, U. (2004). Governance und gesellschaftliche Integration [Governance and public integration] (pp. 9–44). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Luginbuhl, R., Webbink, D., & De Wolf, I. (2009). Do inspections improve primary school performance? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, P., & Sammons, P. (2004). Improvement through inspection. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, T., Rudd, P., Blenkinsop, S., Wade, P., Rutt, S., & Yeshanew, T. (2007). Evaluation of the impact of section 5 inspections. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, A., & Thompson, W. (1997). After the national curriculum: Teacher stress and morale. Research in Education, 57, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2003). Quality and power in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, M., & Ainscow, M. (2005). Understanding failing schools: Perspectives from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onderwijsraad. (2001). De markt meester? Een verkenning naar marktwerking in het onderwijs [Master of market? An exploration of market forces in education]. Den Haag: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Onderwijsraad. (2006). Doortastend onderwijstoezicht [Vigorous school inspections]. Den Haag: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ouston, J., Fidler, B., & Earley, P. (1997). What do schools do after OFSTED school inspections – or before? School Leadership & Management, 17, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2009). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: Department of Educational Organisation and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Segerholm, C. (2011, November). Values in evaluation: The what and how values in Swedish school inspection. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 277–310.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16, 731–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standaert, R. (2001). Inspectorates of education in Europe: A critical analysis. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. (1992). Complexe besluitvorming [Complex decision making]. Den Haag: VUGA.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49, 127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher & R. Coe (Eds.). (2003). School improvement through performance feedback. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B., & Gray, J. (1996). Inspecting schools: Holding schools to account and helping schools to improve. Buckingham: University Press.
   Google Scholar