Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 28, 2017 - Issue 3
622
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Using an iterative mixed-methods research design to investigate schools facing exceptionally challenging circumstances within Trinidad and Tobago

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 406-442 | Received 31 Dec 2014, Accepted 09 Mar 2017, Published online: 03 Apr 2017

References

  • Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Making schools effective for all: Rethinking the task. School Leadership & Management, 32, 197–213. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.669648
  • Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9, 192–202. doi:10.1177/1365480206069014
  • Bacchus, M. K. (2008). The education challenges facing small nation states in the increasingly competitive global economy of the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 44, 127–145. doi:10.1080/03050060802040953
  • Badenhorst, J. W., & Koalepe, L. J. (2014). How do we manage? Determinants of effective leadership in high-poverty schools. Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 243–256.
  • Baye, A., & Monseur, C. (2006, November). Equity of achievement: A matter of education structures? In The second IEA international research conference: Proceedings of the IRC-2006 (Vol. 2, pp. 199–214). Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/IRC2006_Proceedings_Vol2.pdf#page=208
  • Bazeley, P. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioural Scientist, 56, 814–828. doi:10.1177/0002764211426330
  • Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391–409. doi:10.1023/A:1020909529486
  • Bray, M. (1991). Education in small states: Growth of interest and emergence of a theory. Prospects, 21, 503–516.
  • Caldwell, B., & Bradley, R. (1984). Manual for the home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas.
  • Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373. doi:10.3102/01623737025004347
  • Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195–207. doi:10.3102/01623737015002195
  • Castelli, L., Ragazzi, S., & Crescentini, A. (2012). Equity in education: A general overview. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 69, 2243–2250. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.194
  • Cavicchioni, V., & Motivans, A. (2001). Monitoring educational disparities in less developed countries. In W. Hutmacher, D. Cochrane, & N. Bottani (Eds.), In pursuit of equity in education: Using international indicators to compare equity policies (pp. 217–240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/0-306-47579-0_9
  • Chester, M. D. (2005). Making valid and consistent inferences about school effectiveness from multiple measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(4), 40–52. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00022.x
  • Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2010). Does inequality influence the impact of schools on student mathematics achievement? A comparison of nine high-, medium-, and low-inequality countries. In A. W. Wiseman (Ed.), The impact of international achievement studies on national education policymaking (pp. 63–84). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-3679(2010)0000013006
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2016). Preparing teachers for diversity and high poverty schools: A research-based perspective. In J. Lampert & B. Burnett (Eds.), Teacher education for high poverty schools (pp. 9–31). New York, NY: Springer Press.
  • Crossley, M., Bray, M., & Packer, S. (2011). Education in small states: Policies and priorities. London, UK: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  • De Lisle, J. (2008). Can standards-referenced, large-scale assessment data lead to improvement in the education system?: Judging the utility of student performance standards in the primary school national assessments of educational achievement. Caribbean Curriculum, 15, 71–114.
  • De Lisle, J. (2011). The benefits and challenges of mixing methods and methodologies: Lessons learnt from implementing qualitatively led mixed methods research designs in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Curriculum, 18, 87–120.
  • De Lisle, J. (2012). Explaining whole system reform in small states: The case of the Trinidad and Tobago secondary education modernization program. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 15(1), 64–82.
  • De Lisle, J. (2016). Evolving data use policy in Trinidad and Tobago: The search for actionable knowledge on educational improvement in a small island developing state. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28, 35–60. doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9232-7
  • De Lisle, J., Seecharan, H., & Ayodike, A. T. (2010, March). Is the Trinidad and Tobago education system structured to facilitate optimum human capital development? New findings on the relationship between education structures and outcomes from National and International Assessments. Paper presented at the 11th Annual SALISES conference, Turmoil and turbulence in small developing states: Going beyond survival, Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago.
  • De Lisle, J., Smith, P., & Jules, V. (2010). Evaluating the geography of gendered achievement using large-scale assessment data from the primary school system of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.01.001
  • Demeuse, M., Frandji, D., Greger, D., & Rochex, J. (Eds.). (2012). Educational policies and inequalities in Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Duru-Bellat, M., & Suchaut, B. (2005). Organisation and context, efficiency and equity of educational systems: What PISA tells us. European Educational Research Journal, 4, 181–194. doi:10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.3
  • Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Field, S., Kuczera, M., & Pont, B. (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Fuller, B. (1987). What school factors raise achievement in the Third World? Review of Educational Research, 57, 255–292. doi:10.3102/00346543057003255
  • Ganimian, A. J., & Solano Rocha, A. (2011). Measuring up? How did Latin America and the Caribbean perform on the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)? Washington, DC: Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas (PREAL). Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/alejandro_ganimian/files/preal_pisa_englowres.pdf
  • Garroway, C., & de Laiglesia, J. R. (2012). On the relevance of relative poverty for developing countries (OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 314). Paris, France: OECD.
  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479–507. doi:10.2307/1163531
  • Goldschmidt, P., Roschewski, P., Choi, K., Auty, W., Hebbler, S., Blank, R., & Williams, A. (2005). Policymakers’ guide to growth models for school accountability: How do accountability models differ? Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2005/Policymakers_Guide_To_Growth_2005.pdf
  • Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. (2002). Ministry of education strategic plan. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of Education.
  • Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. (2007). Vision 2020 draft national strategic plan. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of Planning.
  • Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. (2012). Education sector strategic plan: 2011–2015. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of Education.
  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Harber, C., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). School effectiveness and school improvement in context: The case of South Africa. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 421–434. doi:10.1076/sesi.11.4.421.3559
  • Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. Management in Education, 16(1), 10–13. doi:10.1177/08920206020160010301
  • Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2004). Improving schools in difficult contexts: Towards a differentiated approach. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52, 417–431. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2004.00276.x
  • Henry-Lee, A. (2001). The dynamics of poverty in Jamaica, 1989–1999. Social & Economic Studies, 50(1), 199–228.
  • Henry-Lee, A. (2005). The nature of poverty in the garrison constituencies in Jamaica. Environment and Urbanization, 17(2), 83–99. doi:10.1177/095624780501700207
  • Herman, R. (2012). Scaling school turnaround. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17, 25–33. doi:10.1080/10824669.2012.637166
  • Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE No. 2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hopkins, D. (2001). Meeting the challenge: An improvement guide for schools facing challenging circumstances. London, UK: Department for Education and Skills.
  • Houtveen, T., Van de Grift, W., Kuijpers, J., Boot, M., Groot, F., & Kooijman, H. (2007). Improving underperforming schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 12, 361–381. doi:10.1080/10824660701758884
  • Jacobson, S. L. (2008). Leadership for success in high poverty elementary schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 23(1), 3–17.
  • Jang, E. E., McDougall, D. E., Pollon, D., Herbert, M., & Russell, P. (2008). Integrative mixed methods data analytic strategies in research on school success in challenging circumstances. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 221–247. doi:10.1177/1558689808315323
  • Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids’ brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Jordan, W. J. (2010). Defining equity: Multiple perspectives to analyzing the performance of diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 34, 142–178. doi:10.3102/0091732X09352898
  • Kairi Consultants. (2007). Analysis of the Trinidad and Tobago survey of living conditions. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: Ministry of Social Development.
  • Kamper, G. (2008). A profile of effective leadership in some South African high-poverty schools. South African Journal of Education, 28, 1–18.
  • Katz, C. M., Maguire, E. R., & Choate, D. (2011). A cross-national comparison of gangs in the United States and Trinidad and Tobago. International Criminal Justice Review, 21, 243–262. doi:10.1177/1057567711417179
  • Khupe, C., Balkwill, K., Osman, R., & Cameron, A. (2013). A needle in a haystack: A search for value for money in turn-around strategies for schools in difficult circumstances. Educational Research, 55, 165–179. doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.801243
  • Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3502_6
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907–945. doi:10.3102/00028312036004907
  • Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. The Journal of School Health, 74, 274–283. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08284.x
  • Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. D. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • MacBeath, J., Gray, J., Cullen, J., Cunnigham, H., Ebbutt, D., Frost, D., … Swaffield, S. (2005). Responding to challenging circumstances: Evaluation of the “Schools Facing Exceptionally Challenging Circumstances” project. Cambridge, UK: Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
  • MacBeath, J., Gray, J. M., Cullen, J., Frost, D., Steward, S., & Swaffield, S. (2007). Schools on the edge: Responding to challenging circumstances. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
  • MacKenzie, C. G. (1991). Denominational primary schooling: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. International Review of Education, 37, 211–226. doi:10.1007/BF00599680
  • Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6, 9–25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11. doi:10.3102/0013189X033002003
  • McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 66–78. doi:10.1177/1744987106060192
  • Mertens, D. M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(138), 5–13. doi:10.1002/ev.20053
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Milner, H. R. (2013). Analyzing poverty, learning, and teaching through a critical race theory lens. Review of Research in Education, 37, 1–53. doi:10.3102/0091732X12459720
  • Modell, S. (2009). In defence of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 20, 208–221. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.04.001
  • Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6, 45–59. doi:10.1177/1468794106058870
  • Morse, J., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 149–175. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary school in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • National Audit Office. (2006). Improving poorly performing schools in England. London, UK: HMSO.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 114–139. doi:10.5172/mra.3.2.114
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1, 4–17. doi:10.5172/mra.455.1.1.4
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equality in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). Paris, France: Author.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? – Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). Paris, France: Author.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris, France: Author.
  • Oswald, M., & Engelbrecht, P. (2013). Leadership in disadvantaged primary schools: Two narratives of contrasting schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, 620–639. doi:10.1177/1741143213488377
  • Painter, B., & Valentine, J. (1996). Instructional practices inventory. Instrument for identification of the level of classroom engagement for students and teachers. Colombia, MO: Middle Level Leadership Centre, University of Missouri.
  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Ravela, P. (2005). A formative approach to national assessments: The case of uruguay. Prospects, 35, 21–43. doi:10.1007/s11125-005-6816-x
  • Reimers, F. (2000). Unequal schools, unequal chances: The challenges to equal opportunity in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Reynolds, D., Harris, A., Clarke, P., Harris, B., & James, S. (2006). Challenging the challenged: Developing an improvement programme for schools facing exceptionally challenging circumstances. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 425–439. doi:10.1080/09243450600743509
  • Riddell, A. R. (1997). Assessing designs for school effectiveness research and school improvement in developing countries. Comparative Education Review, 41, 178–204. doi:10.1086/447429
  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822x02239569
  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Teddlie, C., & Liu, S. (2008). Examining teacher effectiveness within differentially effective primary schools in the People’s Republic of China. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 387–407. doi:10.1080/09243450802535182
  • Teddlie, C., & Sammons, P. (2010). Applications of mixed methods to the field of educational effectiveness research. In B. P. M. Creemers, L. Kyriakides, & P. Sammons (Eds.), Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research (pp. 115–152). London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100. doi:10.1177/2345678906292430
  • Trong, K. L. (2009). Using PIRLS 2006 to measure equity in reading achievement internationally (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2345/667
  • Van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 255–273. doi:10.1080/09243450600697317
  • Van der Berg, S. (2008). How effective are poor schools? Poverty and educational outcomes in South Africa. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.07.005
  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407–428. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538
  • Verrest, H., & Reddock, R. (2004). Poverty and statistics in Trinidad and Tobago: An introduction. Caribbean Dialogue, 9(4), 1–11.
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., Beeri, I., Birman-Shemesh, T., & Somech, A. (2007). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior in the education system: A scale reconstruction and validation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 462–493. doi:10.1177/0013161x07299435
  • Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
  • World Bank. (1993). Caribbean region: Access, quality, and efficiency in education. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (1995a). Priorities and strategies for education: A World Bank review. Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Bank. (1995b). Trinidad and Tobago: Poverty and unemployment in an oil based economy (Report No. 14382–TR). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 117–170. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.00045
  • Yang, Y. (2003). Measuring socio-economic status and its effects at individual and collective levels: A cross-country comparison. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ylimaki, R. M., Jacobson, S. L., & Drysdale, L. (2007). Making a difference in challenging, high-poverty schools: Successful principals in the USA, England, and Australia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 361–381. doi:10.1080/09243450701712486

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.