Quantifying segregation on a small scale: how and where locality determines student compositions and outcomes taking Hamburg, Germany, as an example

References

• Behörde für Schule und Berufsbildung. (2018). Hamburgisches Schulgesetz (HMBSG) [Hamburg Education Act (HMBSG)]. Retrieved from https://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/1995414/3ccecba460184cf0d867cc3a5e7e13b2/data/schulgesetzdownload.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Wohnen. (2015). Sozialmonitoring Integrierte Stadtteilentwicklung Bericht 2015 – Anhang [Social monitoring integrated urban district development report 2015 – Attachment] [Dataset]. Retrieved from http://daten.transparenz.hamburg.de/Dataport.HmbTG.ZS.Webservice.GetRessource100/GetRessource100.svc/6695930c-01d4-4a8b-862f-760ee34337ae/Upload__sozialmonitoring-bericht-2015_anhang-tabelle.xlsx
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. A. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208. doi: 10.1080/01619560902810146
   Google Scholar
• Bell, W. (1954). A probability model for the measurement of ecological segregation. Social Forces, 32(4), 357–364. doi: 10.2307/2574118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkemeyer, N., Hermstein, B., & Manitius, V. (2015): Raum als Kategorie einer bildungssoziologischen Schulforschung [Space as a category of educational sociological school research]. In T. Coelen, A. J. Heinrich, & A. Million (Eds.), Stadtbaustein Bildung (pp. 331–340). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1002/pam.20226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S., Crouchley, R., Millington, J., & Taylor, J. (2000). Testing for quasi-market forces in secondary education. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), 357–390. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg. (2014). Drucksache 20/10935 vom 18.03.14. Appendix [Printed Matter 20/10935 from 18/03/14. Appendix] [Dataset]. Retrieved from http://www.liq-projekte.de/GA_20-10935_Antwort/
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2011). Parental choice of primary school in England: What types of school do different types of family really have available to them? Policy Studies, 32(5), 531–547. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2011.601215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths (NBER Working Paper No. 3705). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, M. (2006). Warum wählen Sie genau diese Schule? Eine inhaltsanalytische Untersuchung elterlicher Begründungen der Wahl der Einzelschule innerhalb eines Bildungsgangs [Why do you choose exactly this school? A content-analytical study of parental reasons for the choice of the individual school within an educational programme]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(1), 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfield, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). Residential distribution and occupational stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 60(5), 493–503. doi: 10.1086/221609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D., & Lieberson, S. (1959). Ethnic segregation and assimilation. American Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 364–374. doi: 10.1086/222496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mafaalani, A., & Strohmeier, K. P. (2015). Segregation und Lebenswelt – Die räumliche Dimension sozialer Ungleichheit [Segregation and lifeworld – The spatial dimension of social inequality]. In A. El-Mafaalani, S. Kurtenbach, & K. P. Strohmeier (Eds.), Auf die Adresse kommt es an . . . Segregierte Stadtteile als Problem- und Möglichkeitsräume begreifen (pp. 18–42). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg. (2011). Bildungsbericht Hamburg 2011 [Report on education in Hamburg 2011]. Retrieved from http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/4023056/data/pdf-hh-bildungsbericht-2011-komplettversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg. (2015a). Schulstatistiken der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg [School statistics of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg]. Retrieved from http://www.hamburg.de/bsb/zusammenfassungen/nofl/4463056/2014-15-hamburger-schulstatistik/
   Google Scholar
• Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg. (2015b). Sozialmonitoring Integrierte Stadtteilentwicklung 2015 [Social monitoring integrated urban district development 2015]. Retrieved from http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/4664066/ec8b589b0fcc8612fbf54359ba38bb60/data/d-sozialmonitoring-bericht-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. R. (2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools? Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 590–612. doi: 10.1177/0013124508316044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & Silva, O. (2006). Competition and accessibility in school markets: Empirical analysis using boundary discontinuities. In T. J. Gronberg & D. W. Jansen (Eds.), Improving school accountability: Check-ups or choice (pp. 157–184). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A., & Asthana, S. (2000). Local markets and the polarization of public-sector schools in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(3), 303–319. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2000.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., & Morris, M. (2008). statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(1), 1–11. doi: 10.18637/jss.v024.i01
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., & Tantrum, J. M. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(2), 301–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). The ripple effect. Educational Leadership, 63(8), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2011a). Measuring social segregation between London’s secondary schools, 2003–2008/9 (CMPO Working Paper No. 11/260). Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2011b). The separation of lower and higher attaining pupils in the transition from primary to secondary schools: A longitudinal study of London (CMPO Working Paper No. 11/257). Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R., & MacDonald, J. A. (2002). Locational decisions of charter schools: Probing the market metaphor. Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), 962–980. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh, A. J., & Knight, P. T. (1998). Secondary school prospectuses and educational markets. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), 21–35. doi: 10.1080/0305764980280103
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209–1238. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.5.1209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, N. (2013). Understanding school choice: Location as a determinant of charter school racial, economic, and linguistic segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45(4), 459–482. doi: 10.1177/0013124511413388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurczok, A., & Lauterbach, W. (2014). Schulwahl von Eltern: Zur Geografie von Bildungschancen in benachteiligten städtischen Bildungsräumen [School choice of parents: On the geography of educational opportunities in urban disadvantaged educational spaces]. In P. A. Berger, C. Keller, A. Klärner, & R. Neef (Eds.), Urbane Ungleichheiten: Neue Entwicklungen zwischen Zentrum und Peripherie (pp. 135–155). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg, R. D. (2011). Combating school segregation in the United States. In J. Bakker, E. Denessen, D. Peters, & G. Walraven (Eds.), International perspectives on countering school segregation (pp. 13–32). Apeldoorn: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, S. (2010). School segregation. In Organisation for Economic Co­operation and Development (Ed.), Equal opportunities? The labour market integration of the children of immigrants (pp. 193–209). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kristen, C. (2005). School choice and ethnic segregation: Primary school selection in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Krivitsky, P. N., & Handcock, M. S. (2008). Fitting position latent cluster models for social networks with latentnet. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(5), 1–23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v024.i05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krivitsky, P. N., & Handcock, M. S. (2014). latentnet: Latent position and cluster models for statistical networks. The Statnet Project. Retrieved from http://www.statnet.org. R package version 2.4.2: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=latentnet
   Google Scholar
• Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T. T., Moser, M., & Henig, J. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrolment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158. doi: 10.3102/01623737024002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leist, S. (2014). Das sozialräumliche Umfeld weiterführender Schulen – Eine dezentralisierte Betrachtung der Hamburger Schullandschaft [The sociospatial context of secondary schools – A decentralized view on Hamburg’s schooling landscape]. In D. Fickermann & N. Maritzen (Eds.), Grundlagen für eine daten- und theoriegestützte Schulentwicklung: Konzeption und Anspruch des Hamburger Instituts für Bildungsmonitoring und Qualitätsentwicklung (IfBQ) (pp. 81–97). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Leist, S., & Pietsch, M. (2017). Bordering the area of spatial relevance for schools: A stochastic network approach using the example of Hamburg, Germany. Belgeo, 2–3. doi: 10.4000/belgeo.20332
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141. doi: 10.1177/0013124507303994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647. doi: 10.1086/599778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., & Lee, J. (2017). Geo-spatial analyses in education research: The critical challenge and methodological possibilities. Geographical Research, 55(1), 89–99. doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lücken, M., Thonke, F., Pohlmann, P., Hofmann, H., Golecki, R., Rosendahl, J., . . . Poerschke, J. (2014). KERMIT – Kompetenzen ermitteln [KERMIT – Assessing competencies]. In D. Fickermann & N. Maritzen (Eds.), Grundlagen für eine daten- und theoriegestützte Schulentwicklung: Konzeption und Anspruch des Hamburger Instituts für Bildungsmonitoring und Qualitätsentwicklung (IfBQ) (pp. 127–154). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Maroy, C. (2006). Ecole, regulation et marche: Une comparaison de six espaces scolaires en Europe [School, regulation and market: A comparison of six school areas in Europe]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review (OECD Education Working Paper No. 66). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). A broken social elevator? How to promote social mobility. Paris: Author. doi: 10.1787/9789264301085-en
   Google Scholar
• Overman, H. G., & Heath, A. (2000). The influence of neighbourhood effects on education decisions in a nationally funded education system: The case of Australia (LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 678). London: London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/678.html
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, M., & Leist, S. (2019). The effects of competition in local schooling markets on leadership for learning. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung 9(1), 109–134. doi: 10.1007/s35834-018-0224-9
   Google Scholar
• Pohlan, J., & Strote, J. (2017). Cities under observation: Social monitoring in integrated neighbourhood development in Hamburg. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2426–2434. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.175
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F. (2015). School segregation and racial academic achievement gaps (CEPA Working Paper No. 15-12). Stanford, CA: Center for Policy Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, A., Schneider, K., Schuchart, C., & Weishaupt, H. (2010). School choice in German primary schools: How binding are school districts? Journal for Educational Research Online 2(1), 94–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144. doi: 10.3102/01623737024002133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchart, C., Schneider, K., Weishaupt, H., & Riedel, A. (2012): Welchen Einfluss hat die Wohnumgebung auf die Grundschulwahl von Eltern? Analysen zur Bedeutung von kontextuellen und familiären Merkmalen auf das Wahlverhalten [Which impact has neighbourhood on primary school choice of parents? Analysis on the relevance of contextual and family characteristics on school choice] (Schumpeter Discussion Paper No. 2011-009). Retrieved from http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-1932/sdp11009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Shevky, E., & Williams, M. (1949). The social areas of Los Angeles: Analysis and typology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sixt, M. (2013). Wohnort, Region und Bildungserfolg. Die strukturelle Dimension bei der Erklärung von regionaler Bildungsungleichheit [Place of residence, region and educational outcome. The structural dimension in explaining regional educational inequality]. In R. Becker & A. Schulze (Eds.), Bildungskontexte (pp. 457–481). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistikamt Nord. (2018). Bevölkerung in Hamburg am 31.12.2017: Auszählung aus dem Melderegister [Population in Hamburg as at 31/12/2017: Register of residents enumeration] (Statistische Berichte A I/S – j 17 HH). Retrieved from https://www.statistik-nord.de/fileadmin/Dokumente/Statistische_Berichte/bevoelkerung/A_I_S_1_j_H/A_I_S1_j17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Templin, J. (2008). Methods for detecting subgroups in social networks. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 309–334). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Zanten, A. (2005). New modes of reproducing social inequality in education: The changing role of parents, teachers, schools and educational policies. European Educational Research Journal 4(3), 155–169. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.1
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (1992). Educational choice and equity in Great Britain. Educational Policy, 6(2), 123–138. doi: 10.1177/0895904892006002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar