Testing the predictive power of an instrument titled “Orientation to School Renewal”

References

• Aguayo, R. (1990). Dr. Deming: The American who taught the Japanese about quality. Fireside.
   Google Scholar
• Bamburg, J. D., & Andrews, R. L. (1991). School goals, principals, and achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020302
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, J. J. (2016). Developing a positive classroom climate (IDEA Paper No. 61). The IDEA Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Implementation of educational innovation. The Educational Forum, 40(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, V. L. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school improvement (2nd ed.). Eye on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, V. L. (2009). Data, data everywhere: Bringing all the data together for continuous school improvement. Eye on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bitter, C., O’Day, J., Gubbins, P., & Socias, M. (2009). What works to improve student literacy achievement? An examination of instructional practices in a balanced literacy approach. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 14(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660802715403
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. (2016). The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711412765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: Finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16665332
   Google Scholar
• Cerych, L. (1997). Educational reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Processes and outcomes. European Journal of Education, 32(1), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S. W. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the Coalition Campus Schools Project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639–673. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039003639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2015). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, D., & Marshall, S. (2007). Educational leadership and school renewal in Wales. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410705100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faasse, J. H., Bakker, B., Dronkers, J., & Schijf, H. (1987). The impact of educational reform: Empirical evidence from two Dutch generations. Comparative Education, 23(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006870230302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A. (2009). Accountability nudges districts into changes in culture. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). Educational reform as continuous improvement. In W. D. Hawley (Ed.), The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement (pp. 1–12). Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallimore, R., Ermeling, B. A., Saunders, W. M., & Goldenberg, C. (2009). Moving the learning of teaching closer to practice: Teacher education implications of school-based inquiry teams. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1086/597001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Walters, K., Song, M., Brown, S., Hurlburt, S., Zhu, P., Sepanik, S., & Doolittle, F. (2010). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2010-4009). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A. (1993, July-August). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008, March). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I. (1975a). The dynamics of educational change. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I. (1975b). The uses of alternative theories of educational change: A monograph. Phi Delta Kappa International.
   Google Scholar
• Günal, Y., & Demirtaşlı, R. N. (2016). A pathway to educational accountability: The relationship between effective school characteristics and student achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2049–2054. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040915
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., & Fitzgerald, T. (2013). New public management and the modernisation of education systems 1 [Editorial]. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(3), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.796914
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996a). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723–783). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996b). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010a). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010b). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244777
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (1999). Teaching and learning and the challenge of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.2.257.3506
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2000). Introduction to special feature: Alternative perspectives on school improvement. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430068842
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Young, J. (2000). Comparing school improvement programmes in England and Canada. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430068860
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, W. D. (1995). The learning organization: Some reflections on organizational renewal. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(8), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739510097996
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2013). Exploding the myths of school reform. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.793493
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Harris, A., & Jackson, D. (1997). Understanding the school’s capacity for development: Growth states and strategies. School Leadership & Management, 17(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439769944
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539325
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B., & McGhee, M. W. (2013). Leading inquiry in schools: Examining mental models of data-informed practice. Current Issues in Education, 16(1). 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (1995). School renewal: An inquiry, not a formula. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., Wolf, J., & Calhoun, E. (1993). The self-renewing school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P., & Saunders, B. (1998). Ten steps to a learning organization (2nd ed.). Great Ocean.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2016). The impact of data use professional development on student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Wong, K. K. (2004). The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 797–832. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041004797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezotte, L. W. (1991). Correlates of effective schools: The first and second generation. Effective Schools Products.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460601600502
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Arreman, I. E., Lundström, U., & Rönnberg, L. (2010). Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daley, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnery, J. A., Ross, S. M., Chappell, S., Pribesh, S., & Hoag-Carhart, E. (2011). The impact of the NISL Executive Development Program on school performance in Massachusetts: Cohort 2 results. The Center for Educational Partnerships, Darden College of Education, Old Dominion University.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne-Lampkin, L., Folsom, J. S., & Herrington, C. D. (2015). A systematic review of the relationships between principal characteristics and student achievement (REL 2016–091). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2003). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240–258.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, P., Palmer, L. B., McCrumb, D., & Shen, J. (2014). Sustaining a renewal model for school improvement. In K. L. Sanzo (Ed.), From policy to practice: Sustainable innovations in school leadership preparation and development (pp. 267–292). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Gray, C., Gingiss, P. M., & Boerm, M. (2007). Evaluating school capacity to implement new programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2012). Summary and conclusion: Instructional leadership in schools as loosely coupled organizations. In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies (pp. 131–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2768-7_5
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. (2015). Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Bantam Doubleday Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education (Rev. ed.). Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M., Lichtenstein, B. B., Kaeufer, K., Bradbury, H., & Carroll, J. S. (2007, January). Collaborating for systemic change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 44–53. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/collaborating-for-systemic-change/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). Strengthening the heartbeat: Leading and learning together in schools. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. (2015). Summaries and reflections: Toward school renewal. In J. Shen & W. L. Burt (Eds.), Learning-centered school leadership: School renewal in action (pp. 209–221). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Burt, W. L. (Eds.). (2015). Learning-centered school leadership: School renewal in action. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Cooley, V. E. (Eds.). (2013). A resource book for improving principals’ learning-centered leadership. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Cooley, V. E. (2015). Facilitating school renewal via the Learning-Centered Leadership Development Program: An introduction. In J. Shen & W. L. Burt (Eds.), Learning-centered school leadership: School renewal in action (pp. 3–21). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Ma, X., Mansberger, N., Bierlein Palmer, L., Burt, W., Leneway, R., Reeves, P., Poppink, S., McCrumb, D., Whitten, E., & Gao, X. (2018). Developing and validating an instrument measuring school renewal: Testing the factorial validity and reliability [Manuscript submitted for publication].
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Palmer, L. B., & Crawford, C. (2005). The importance of educational goals as perceived by principals. In J. Shen (Ed.), School principals (pp. 46–60). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Espin, C. A., Deno, S. L., & McConnell, S. (2004). Use of hierarchical linear modeling and curriculum-based measurement for assessing academic growth and instructional factors for students with learning difficulties. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024951
   Google Scholar
• Sirotnik, K. A. (1999). Making sense of educational renewal. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(8), 606–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Holmes, G., Madden, N. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2013). Effects of a data-driven district reform model on state assessment outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212466909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P., & Wesselingh, A. (1995). Dutch dilemmas: Decentralisation, school autonomy and professionalisation of teachers. Educational Review, 47(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191950470207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. M., Cobb, P., Farran, D. C., Cordray, D. S., & Munter, C. (2013). Evaluating math recovery: Assessing the causal impact of a diagnostic tutoring program on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212469045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soder, R. (1999). When words find their meaning: Renewal versus reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(8), 568–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1994). How districts mediate between state policy and teachers’ practice. In R. F. Elmore & S. H. Fuhrman (Eds.), The governance of curriculum: 1994 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 167–185). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starratt, R. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community and excellence. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Strain, P. S., & Bovey, E. H., II. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(3), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411408740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. C. (2008). Improving secondary students’ academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802535190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., & Perreault, G. (2002). Becoming a data-based leader: An introduction. NASSP Bulletin, 86(630), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650208663009
   Google Scholar
• van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J.-P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodland, R., Lee, M. K., & Randall, J. (2013). A validation study of the teacher collaboration assessment survey. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(5), 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.795118
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zeinabadi, H. R. (2014). Principal-teacher high-quality exchange indicators and student achievement: Testing a model. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2012-0056
   Google Scholar