The implementation and potential effects of teacher evaluation under local control

References

• Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggshall, J. G., Rasmussen, C., Colton, A., Milton, J., & Jacques, C. (2012). Generating teaching effectiveness: The role of job-embedded professional learning in teacher evaluation (Research & Policy Brief). National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED532776
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Loeb, S., Miller, L. C., & Wyckoff, J. H. (2020). Policy implementation, principal agency, and strategic action: Improving teaching effectiveness in New York City middle schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719893338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189290
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, D. J., Hall, E. L., & Marion, S. (2017). Teacher evaluation and local control in the US: An investigation into the degree of local control afforded to districts in defining evaluation procedures for teachers in non-tested subjects and grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1167669
   Google Scholar
• Garofano, A., & Sable, J. (2008). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the united states: 2004–05 (NCES 2008-335). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gilles, J. F. (2017). “It’s not a gotcha”: Interpreting teacher evaluation policy in rural school district. The Rural Educator, 38(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i2.224
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., Loeb, S., Goldhaber, D., Staiger, D., Raudenbush, S., & Whitehurst, G. (2010). Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added. Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., & Youngs, P. (Eds.). (2016). Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Cohen, J., Ronfeldt, M., & Brown, L. (2014). The test matters: The relationship between classroom observation scores and teacher value added on multiple types of assessment. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14544542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Reckase, M. D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 117–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, C. M. D., & Sojourner, A. J. (2015). Unionization and productivity: Evidence from charter schools. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 54(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazi, H. M. (2016). Research on teacher evaluation: A review of statute, regulation and litigation in the region. The Rural Educator, 37(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v37i1.295
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, K. K. (2015). Educator evaluation policy that incorporates EVAAS value-added measures: Undermined intentions and exacerbated inequities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 76. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1968
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., Sporte, S. E., & Luppescu, S. (2015). Teacher perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago’s REACH students. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.3.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Sun, M., & Youngs, P. (2019). Developing the “will”: The relationship between teachers’ perceived policy legitimacy and instructional improvement. Teachers College Record, 121(3), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Youngs, P. (2016). Promoting instructional improvement or resistance? A comparative study of teachers’ perceptions of teacher evaluation policy in Korea and the USA. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1057478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021787806189
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2017). Revisiting The Widget Effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17718797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. A. (2005). A critical analysis of teacher evaluation policy trends. Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410504900306
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindo, J. M. (2010). Are children really inferior goods? Evidence from displacement-driven income shocks. Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.45.2.301
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., & Hough, H. (2017). Learning from early adopters in the new accountability era: Insights from California’s CORE waiver districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16688064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., Strunk, K. O., Lincove, J. A., & Huguet, A. (2017). Evaluating teachers in the Big Easy: How organizational context shapes policy responses in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 539–570. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717698221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. F., Schweig, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (2016). Approaches for combining multiple measures of teacher performance: Reliability, validity, and implications for evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 738–756. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716666166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Toth, M., & Schooling, P. (2012). Examining the role of teacher evaluation in student achievement: Contemporary research base for the Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model. https://www.learningsciences.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Examining-the-Role-of-Teacher-Evaluation-in-Student-Achievement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Sass, T. R., Lockwood, J. R., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 572–606. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G., III. (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012752725765
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: The case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher, 42(6), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13499625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2020). Teacher evaluations under ESSA. https://www.nea.org/resource-library/teacher-evaluations-under-essa
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026003237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhorn, S. K., Johnson, S. M., & Simon, N. S. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the Massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717690605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, E., & Walsh, K. (2019). State of the states 2019: Teacher and principal evaluation policy. National Council on Teacher Quality. https://www.nctq.org/dmsView/NCTQ_State_of_the_States_2019_print_ready
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojourner, A. J., Mykerezi, E., & West, K. L. (2014). Teacher pay reform and productivity: Panel data evidence from adoptions of Q-Comp in Minnesota. Journal of Human Resources, 49(4), 945–981. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.49.4.945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Ballou, D., Hamilton, L., Le, V.-N., Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Pepper, M., & Stecher, B. M. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching. National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., Robyn, A., Baird, M. D., Gutierrez, I. A., Peet, E. D., Brodziak de los Reyes, I., Fronberg, K., Weinberger, G., Hunter, G. P., & Chambers, J. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: Final report: The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2242.html
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). The sensitivity of teacher performance ratings to the design of teacher evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., & Sartain, L. (2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s Excellence in Teaching Project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 535–572. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (2010). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Penner, E. K., & Loeb, S. (2017). Resource-and approach-driven multidimensional change: Three-year effects of school improvement grants. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F., & Chow, A. W. K. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New Teacher Project. (2010). Teacher Evaluation 2.0. https://tntp.org/assets/documents/Teacher-Evaluation-Oct10F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., Keeling, D., Schunck, J., Palcisco, A., & Morgan, K. (2009). The Widget Effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness (2nd ed.). https://tntp.org/assets/documents/TheWidgetEffect_2nd_ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District leaders’ framing of educator evaluation policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar