Factors related to differences in digitally measured student perceptions of teaching quality

References

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rd ed.). Anker Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Atlay, C., Tieben, N., Fauth, B., & Hilmert, S. (2018, August 28–31). Filter of entitlement? Relationships between SES, prior achievement and students’ perception of teacher support [Paper presentation]. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Groningen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balch, R. T. (2012). The validation of a student survey on teacher practice [Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University]. Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-07182012-153440
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2004). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and accomplishments. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255666969_Expert_Teachers_Their_Characteristics_Development_and_Accomplishments
   Google Scholar
• Bijlsma, H. J. E. (2016). Gathering feedback by means of student perceptions. A systematic review of student perception questionnaires [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Bijlsma, H. J. E., Glas, C. A. W., & Visscher, A. J. (2021). The reliability and construct validity of student perceptions of teaching quality [Manuscript submitted for publication]. ELAN, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Bijlsma, H. J. E., Visscher, A. J., Dobbelaer, M. J., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2019). Does smartphone-assisted student feedback affect teachers’ teaching quality? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1572534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., & Russell, A. (2019). Class size, grouping practices and classroom management. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E. (1985). Teacher-student interaction. In J. B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 303–328). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, R. J., Gentile, P., & Bigger, S. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective. Higher Education, 34(4), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003042830109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., Smith, D., & McCrindle, A. (1999). Classroom learning environments and students’ approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 2(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966107233
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., & Kington, A. (2008). Effective classroom practice (ECP): A mixed-method study of influences and outcomes. School of Education, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2006). Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environment Research, 9(3), Article 199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9013-9
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P. J., Levy, J., Mason, G., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students’ subject-specific motivation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(2), 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P. J., Levy, J., Rodriguez, R., & Wubbels, T. (2002). Perceptions of Asian-American and Hispanic-American teachers and their students on teacher interpersonal communication style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., Levy, J., Wubbels, T., & Rodriguez, M. (2003). Cultural influences on students’ perceptions of videotaped lessons. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dev, S., & Qayyum, N. (2017). Major factors affecting students’ perception towards faculty evaluation of teaching. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. M. (1994). Student perceptions of their teachers, their school, and themselves as learners (Publication No. 10694) [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-9962
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, B. J., Jackson, J. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2006). The stress response systems: Universality and adaptive individual differences. Developmental Review, 26(2), 175–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. F. (2012). Can student surveys measure teaching quality? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., den Brok, P., & Rickards, T. (2006). Factors influencing students’ perceptions of their teachers’ interpersonal behaviour: A multilevel analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: World views (pp. 51–74). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812774651_0003
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P., & Glas, C. A. W. (2001). Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika, 66(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P., & Glas, C. A. W. (2003). Bayesian modeling of measurement error in predictor variables using item response theory. Psychometrika, 68(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, F. F., & Bown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education (74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, pp. 25–52). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, H. (2014). Effects of student feedback as a method of self-evaluating the quality of teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1995, April 18–22). Learning environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics classrooms in Singapore [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. T., & Kirk, C. M. (1990). Gender differences in students’ interests in applications of school physics. Physics Education, 25(6), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/25/6/304
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Research paper. MET project. Bell & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, A. (2010). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (1992). Student and teacher characteristics and perceptions of teacher communication style. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(1), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Morganfield, B. (1997). Language and cultural factors in students’ perceptions of teacher communication style. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(96)00005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Wubbels, T., den Brok, P., & Brekelmans, M. (2003). Students’ perceptions of interpersonal aspects of the learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 6, 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022967927037
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Jackson, C., Best, N., Thomas, A., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2012). The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 28(25), 3049–3067. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319–383). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (2013). Four metaphors we need to understand assessment. Report for The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art – Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169201600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D., Wahlquist, C., & Bone, K. (2000). Student surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102519702
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., & Nimetz, S. L. (1989). The student-teacher relationship scale: Results of a pilot study. James Madison University. (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. ED308961)
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Towsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, L. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2000). Multiple dimensions of university teacher self-concept. Instructional Science, 28(5), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026576404113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. (2003). Designing student feedback questionnaires. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(3), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310488454
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
   Google Scholar
• Timm, J. T. (1999). The relationship between culture and cognitive style: A review of the evidence and some reflections for the classroom. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 12(2), 36–44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED433169.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research and Evaluation, 49(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369651
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2010, March 23). Ontwikkeling in de beroepsvaardigheden van leraren [Teacher professional skills development] [Inaugural lecture]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W. J. C. M., van der Wal, M., & Torenbeek, M. (2011). Ontwikkeling in de pedagogische didactische vaardigheid van leraren in het basisonderwijs [Development of pedagogical didactic skills of primary school teachers]. Pedagogische Studiën, 88(6), 416–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & van Veen, K. (2015). Developing a teacher evaluation instrument to provide formative feedback using student ratings of teaching acts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Scheer, E. A., Bijlsma, H. J. E., & Glas, C. (2019). Validity and reliability of student perceptions of teaching quality in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S.-Y. L. (1998). Classroom learning environments in urban elementary, middle, and high schools. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009940816549
   Google Scholar
• Wile, A. J., & Shouppe, G. A. (2011). Does time-of-day of instruction impact class achievement? Perspectives in Learning, 12(1), Article 9. https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/pil/vol12/iss1/9/
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2010). The current impact of neuroscience on teaching and learning. In D. Sousa (Ed.), Mind, brain, & education: Neuroscience implications for the classroom (pp. 45–66). Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, A. C. (2002). The impact of student perceptions and characteristics on teaching evaluations: A case study in finance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120105054
   Google Scholar