Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 34, 2023 - Issue 4
1,617
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The stimulation of school improvement processes: the orientation of development perspectives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 442-462 | Received 19 Oct 2022, Accepted 08 Aug 2023, Published online: 17 Aug 2023

References

  • Baumert, J., Stanat, P., & Watermann, R. (2006). Schulstruktur und die Entstehung differenzieller Lern- und Entwicklungsmilieus [School structure and the emergence of differential learning and development environments]. In J. Baumert, P. Stanat, & R. Watermann (Eds.), Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen: Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 95–188). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Benoliel, P., & Berkovich, I. (2021). Learning from intelligent failure: An organizational resource for school improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0155
  • Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–398. https://doi.org/10.3102/016237371141276
  • Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
  • Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge.
  • Demski, D. (2017). Schulentwicklungsforschung: Vol. 2. Evidenzbasierte Schulentwicklung: Empirische Analyse eines Steuerungsparadigmas [School improvement research: Vol. 2. Evidence-based school improvement: Empirical analysis of a governance paradigm]. Springer VS.
  • Ditton, H. (2000). Qualitätskontrolle und Qualitätssicherung in Schule und Unterricht. Ein Überblick zum Stand der empirischen Forschung [Quality monitoring and quality assurance in schools and classrooms. An overview of the state of empirical research]. In A. Helmke, W. Hornstein, & E. Terhart (Eds.), Qualität und Qualitätssicherung im Bildungsbereich; Schule, Sozialpädagogik, Hochschule (pp. 73–92). Beltz. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8486
  • Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.
  • Ellis, S., Carette, B., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2014). Systematic reflection: Implications for learning from failures and successes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413504106
  • Emmerich, M., & Maag Merki, K. (2014). Die Entwicklung von Schule. Theorie – Forschung – Praxis [The development of school. Theory – Research – Practice]. In B. Dippelhofer-Stiem & S. Dippelhofer (Eds.), Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft online: Erziehungs- und Bildungssoziologie, Makrosoziologische Analysen: Funktionen, Strukturen und Institutionen. Beltz Juventa. https://doi.org/10.3262/EEO20140338
  • Faulstich, P. (2014). Lerndebatten [Learning debates]. In P. Faulstich (Ed.), Theorie Bilden: Vol. 34. Lerndebatten: Phänomenologische, pragmatistische und kritische Lerntheorien in der Diskussion (pp. 11–34). transcript.
  • Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What's in it for schools? Routledge.
  • Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164525
  • Holtappels, H. G., & Rolff, H.-G. (2010). Einführung: Theorien der Schulentwicklung [Introduction: Theories of school development]. In T. Bohl, W. Helsper, H. G. Holtappels, & C. Schelle (Eds.), UTB Schulpädagogik: Vol. 8443. Handbuch Schulentwicklung: Theorie – Forschungsbefunde – Entwicklungsprozesse – Methodenrepertoire (pp. 73–78). Julius Klinkhardt.
  • Huber, S. G. (2018). No simple fixes for schools in challenging circumstances: Contextualization for Germany. In C. V. Meyers & M. J. Darwin (Eds.), International perspectives on leading low-performing schools (pp. 243–266). Information Age Publishing.
  • Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Teachers College Record, 109(13), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710901310
  • Karsten, S., Voncken, E., & Voorthuis, M. (2000). Dutch primary schools and the concept of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 7(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470010335863
  • Klein, E. D. (2016). Zwillinge oder entfernte Verwandte? Strategien der Schulleitung in Schulen in deprivierter Lage in Deutschland und den USA [Twins or distant relatives? Strategies used by school leaders in schools in challenging contexts in Germany and the USA]. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 6(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-015-0138-8
  • Klein, E. D. (2017). Bedingungen und Formen erfolgreicher Schulentwicklung in Schulen in sozial deprivierter Lage: Eine Expertise im Auftrag der Wübben Stiftung [Conditions and patterns of successful school improvement in schools serving disadvantaged communities: A report commissioned by the Wübben Foundation] (SHIP Working Paper No. 01). https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/4438
  • Kools, M., Stoll, L., George, B., Steijn, B., Bekkers, V., & Gouëdard, P. (2020). The school as a learning organisation: The concept and its measurement. European Journal of Education, 55(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12383
  • Lai, M. K., Wilson, A., McNaughton, S., & Hsiao, S. (2014). Improving achievement in secondary schools: Impact of a literacy project on reading comprehension and secondary school qualifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.73
  • Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 175–198). SAGE Publications.
  • Mayring, P. (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse – Ein Beispiel für Mixed Methods [Qualitative content analysis – An example of mixed methods]. In M. Gläser-Zikuda, T. Seidel, C. Rohlfs, A. Gröschner, & S. Ziegelbauer (Eds.), Mixed Methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung (pp. 27–36). Waxmann.
  • Meyers, C. V., & Murphy, J. (2007). Turning around failing schools: An analysis. Journal of School Leadership, 17(5), 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460701700504
  • Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.009
  • Morley, A. (2006). The development of leadership capacity in a school facing challenging circumstances. In M. Ainscow & M. West (Eds.), Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration (pp. 24–34). Open University Press.
  • Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Innovative workplaces: Making better use of skills within organisations. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264095687-en
  • Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2000). Zur Rolle der Lehrperson beim kooperativen Lernen [On the role of the teacher in cooperative learning]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften, 22(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3747
  • Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
  • Racherbäumer, K., & van Ackeren, I. (2015). Was ist eine (gute) Schule in schwieriger Lage? Befunde einer Studie im kontrastiven Fallstudiendesign an Schulen in der Metropolregion Ruhr [What is a (good) school in a challenging situation? Findings of a study in a contrastive case study design at schools in the Ruhr metropolitan region]. In L. Fölker, T. Hertel, & N. Pfaff (Eds.), Brennpunkt(-)Schule: Zum Verhältnis von Schule, Bildung und Urbaner Segregation (pp. 189–208). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf0dt8.13
  • Reusser, K., & Pauli, C. (2015). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 913–917). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92026-9
  • Schechter, C., Sykes, I., & Rosenfeld, J. (2004). Learning from success: A leverage for transforming schools into learning communities. Planning and Changing, 35(3/4), 154–168.
  • Schechter, C., Sykes, I., & Rosenfeld, J. (2008). Learning from success as leverage for school learning: Lessons from a national programme in Israel. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701576274
  • Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Holmes, G., Madden, N. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2013). Effects of a data-driven district reform model on state assessment outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212466909
  • Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
  • Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). A brief history of school improvement research in the USA. In A. Harris & J. H. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives (pp. 23–38). Routledge.
  • Thillmann, K., Brauckmann, S., Herrmann, C., & Thiel, F. (2015). Praxis schulischer Personalentwicklung unter den Bedingungen der Neuen Steuerung [Practice of school personnel development under the conditions of New Management]. In H. J. Abs, T. Brüsemeister, M. Schemmann, & J. Wissinger (Eds.), Educational governance: Vol. 26. Governance im Bildungssystem: Analysen zur Mehrebenenperspektive, Steuerung und Koordination (pp. 195–228). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06523-2_8
  • van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J.-P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637346
  • Vanlommel, K., & Schildkamp, K. (2019). How do teachers make sense of data in the context of high-stakes decision making? American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 792–821. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218803891
  • West, M., Ainscow, M., & Stanford, J. (2006). Achieving sustainable improvements in urban schools. In M. Ainscow & M. West (Eds.), Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration (pp. 46–57). Open University Press.
  • Zakay, D., Ellis, S., & Shevalsky, M. (2004). Outcome value and early warning indications as determinants of willingness to learn from experience. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.150