Binocular and Accommodative Characteristics in a Normal Population

References

• Cacho-Martínez P, García-Muñoz Á, Ruiz-Cantero MT. Do we really know the prevalence of accomodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions? J Optom. 2010;3:185–197.
   Google Scholar
• Shin HS, Park SC, Park CM. Relationship between accommodative and vergence dysfunctions and academic achievement for primary school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29:615–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JS, Burns CR, Cotter SA, Daum KM, Griffin JR, Scheiman M. Care of the patient with accommodative and vergence dysfunction. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2011. Available at: https://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=33579. Accessed October 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• García-Muñoz Á, Carbonell-Bonete S, Cacho-Martínez P. Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies. J Optom. 2014;7:178–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granet DB, Gomi CF, Ventura R, Miller-Scholte A. The relationship between convergence insufficiency and ADHD. Strabismus. 2005;13:163–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wajuihian SO, Hansraj R. A review of non-strabismic accommodative-vergence anomalies in school-age children. Part 1: Vergence anomalies. African Vision and Eye Health. 2015;74:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez R, Perez MA, Garcia JA, Gonzalez MD. Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:528–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AH, Abidin AHZ. Vergence and accommodation system in Malay primary school children. Malays J Med Sci. 2002;9:9–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan MW. Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom. 1944;21(12):477–491.
   Google Scholar
• Kragha IK. Accommodative vergence and related findings for a Nigerian population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1985;5:435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MH, Law LF, Lee CM, Leung KM, Lui WO. Clinical norms for amplitude of accommodation in Chinese. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AH, O’Leary DJ, Howell ER. Near visual function in young children. Part I: near point of convergence. Part II: amplitude of accommodation. Part III: near heterophoria. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20:185–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzelli AR. Vergence facility: developmental trends in a school age population. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63:351–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palomo Álvarez C, Puell M, Sánchez–Ramos C, Villena C. Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:821–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon DW, Goss DA, Horner D, Downey JP, Rainey B. Normative data for modified Thorington phorias and prism bar vergences from the Benton-IU study. Optometry. 2005;76:593–599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goss D, Zhai H. Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;86:349–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham NG, Srinivasan K, Thomas J. Normative data for near point of convergence, accommodation, and phoria. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ostadimoghaddam H, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, et al. Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender: the Mashhad eye study of Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2011;39:743–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yazdani N, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors among Iranian university students. Iran J Ophthalmol. 2015;26:129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Faa PSDBL. Clinical criteria for vergence accommodation dysfunction. Clin Exp Optom. 1991;74:112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima T, Torii M, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. The relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. J Vis. 2009;21:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Jafarzadehpur E, et al. Population-based study of presbyopia in Shahroud, Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:863–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin B. The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter HW. A comparison of Duane’s and Donders’ tables of the amplitude of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 1944;21:345–363.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsi M, Heron G, Charman WN. Changes in the static accommodation response with age. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce AS, Atchison DA, Bhoola H. Accommodation-convergence relationships and age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:406–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokoda SC, Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ. Proximal vergence and age. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron G, Charman WN, Schor MC. Age changes in the interactions between the accommodation and vergence systems. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:754–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickwell LD. The increase in convergence inadequacy with age. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1985;5:347–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer A, Hefetz L. Normal heterophoric changes: 20 years’ follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235:345–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Abrishami M. Comparison of amplitudes of fusional vergence in patients with asthenopic and asymptomatic near exophoria. Iran J Ophthalmol. 2014;26:199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda MH, Claverie A. The phoria and vergences changes with age and refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:273.
   Google Scholar