References
- Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus. 2020 October;1-6. doi:10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002.
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;18;8(12):e82469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082469.
- Aslam S YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts: omnicore. 2019. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/.
- Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:1334–1339. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
- Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e799–e804.
- Ranade AS, Belthur MV, Oka GA, Malone JD. YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29:375–378. doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000694.