47
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Author reply

(Methods of analysis regarding strabismus videos on YouTube)

ORCID Icon, , , , &

References

  • Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus. 2020 October;1-6. doi:10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002.
  • Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;18;8(12):e82469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082469.
  • Aslam S YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts: omnicore. 2019. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/.
  • Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:1334–1339. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
  • Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e799–e804.
  • Ranade AS, Belthur MV, Oka GA, Malone JD. YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29:375–378. doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000694.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.