Mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling and damage prediction of irregular-shaped interfaces in wood–plastic composites

References

• Shahi P, Behravesh AH, Daryabari SY, Lotfi M. Experimental investigation on reprocessing of extruded wood flour/HDPE composites. Polym. Compos. 2012;33:753–763.10.1002/pc.v33.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi F, Behravesh AH, Mirzaei M. In-situ observation of fracture mechanism of wood–plastic composites in tension. Compos. Interfaces. 2013;20:211–220.10.1080/15685543.2013.770684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfaghari A, Behravesh AH, Adli A, TabkhPaz M. Continuous glass fiber reinforced wood plastic composite in extrusion process: feasibility and processing. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2013;32:52–60.10.1177/0731684412461461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi F, Behravesh AH, Mirzaei M. Effect of temperature on the fracture mechanism of wood–plastic composites in situ. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2013; 0892705713515696.
   Google Scholar
• Renner K, Kenyó C, Móczó J, Pukánszky B. Micromechanical deformation processes in PP/wood composites: particle characteristics, adhesion, mechanisms. Compos. Part A. 2010;41:1653–1661.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourado N, Morel S, de Moura MFSF, Valentin G, Morais J. Comparison of fracture properties of two wood species through cohesive crack simulations. Composites Part A. 2008;39:415–427.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara H. Simple estimation of critical stress intensity factors of wood by tests with double cantilever beam and three-point end notched flexure. Holzf. 2007;61:182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, McMillan AJ. Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: a review. Polym. Test. 2012;31:481–489.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams ML. The stress around a fault or crack in dissimilar media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1959;49:199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Sun W, Tomblin JS, Smeltzer SS. A semi-analytical method for determining the strain energy release rate of cracks in adhesively-bonded single-lap composite joints. J. Compos. Mater. 2007;41:1579–1602.10.1177/0021998306069872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang Z, Li G. Cohesive zone model based analytical solutions for adhesively bonded pipe joints under torsional loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2009;46:1205–1217.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barenblatt GI. The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses axially-symmetric cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 1959; 23:622–636.
   Google Scholar
• Dugdale DS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1960;8:100–104.10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice JR. A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J. Appl. Mech. 1968;35:379–386.10.1115/1.3601206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao WA, Hu XF. A singular finite element on the mixed-mode bimaterial interfacial cracks. Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 2012;13:219–226.10.1080/15502287.2011.650345
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang Z, Ji G, Li G. On approximately realizing and characterizing pure mode-i interface fracture between bonded dissimilar materials. J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78:310–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Deng X. Elastic fields around the cohesive zone of a mode III crack perpendicular to a bimaterial interface. J. Appl. Mech. 2007;74:1049–1052.10.1115/1.2723814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo Z, Hutchinson JW. Interface crack between two elastic layers. Int. J. Fract. 1990;43:1–18.10.1007/BF00018123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF. Cohesive law and notch sensitivity of adhesive joints. Acta Mater. 2002;50:1053–1061.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00404-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF, Kirkegaard P. Determination of mixed mode cohesive laws. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006;73:2642–2661.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sills RB, Thouless MD. The effect of cohesive-law parameters on mixed-mode fracture. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2013;109:353–368.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1994;42:1397–1434.10.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW. The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1993;41:1119–1135.10.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho GT, Ortiz M. Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1996;33:2899–2938.10.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSF, Barreto AMJP, Morais JJL, Domingues JJMS. Fracture behaviour of damaged wood beams repaired with an adhesively-bonded composite patch. Composites Part A. 2009;40:852–859.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YL, Lin XH, Qin QH. Inverse/genetic method and its application in identification of mechanical parameters of interface in composite. Compos. Struct. 2004;66:449–458.10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MJ, Cho TM, Kim WS, Lee BC, Lee JJ. Determination of cohesive parameters for a mixed-mode cohesive zone model. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012;30:322–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele R, Raka B, Hild F, Roux S. Identification of adhesive properties in GLARE assemblies using digital image correlation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2009;57:1003–1016.10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valoroso N, Fedele R. Characterization of a cohesive-zone model describing damage and de-cohesion at bonded interfaces: sensitivity analysis and mode-I parameter identification. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2010;47:1666–1677.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guessasma S, Bassir DH. Identification of mechanical properties of biopolymer composites sensitive to interface effect using hybrid approach. Mech. Mater. 2010;42:344–353.10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen B, Paulino GH. Identification of cohesive zone model and elastic parameters of fiber-reinforced cementitious composites using digital image correlation and a hybrid inverse technique. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011;33:572–585.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira MDC, Venturini WS, Hild F. On the analysis of notched concrete beams: from measurement with digital image correlation to identification with boundary element method of a cohesive model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2011;78:71–84.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han B, Ju Y, Zhou C. Simulation of crack propagation in HTPB propellant using cohesive zone model. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2012;26:304–317.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar