Interphase characterization of glass/epoxy composite using peridynamic method and micro tensile test

References

• Mishnaevsky L. Nanostructured interfaces for enhancing mechanical properties of composites: computational micromechanical studies. Compos Part B. 2015;68:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Chandra R, Singh SP. Interphase effect on fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Interfaces. 2010;17(1):15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Koenig MF, et al. Adhesion of graphite fibers to epoxy matrices II the effect of fiber finish. J Adhes. 1983;16(2):133–152. DOI:10.1080/00218468308074911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang LY, Huanga Y, Jiang H, et al. A cohesive law for carbon nanotube/polymer interfaces based on the van der Waals force. J Mech Phys Solids. 2006;54(11):2436–2452. DOI:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Kumar D. A continuum model to study interphase effects on elastic properties of CNT/GS-nanocomposite. Mater Res Express. 2017;4(2):025036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JL, Tzeng SH, Chiu YT. Characterizing elastic properties of carbon nanotubes/polyimide nanocomposites using multi-scale simulation. Compos Part B. 2010;41(1):106–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Nishimura N, Qian D, et al. A boundary element method for the analysis of CNT/polymer composites with a cohesive interface model based on molecular dynamics. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 2008;32(4):299–308. DOI:10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrieh M, Rafiee R. Rafiee R. On the tensile behavior of an embedded carbon nanotube in polymer matrix with non-bonded interphase region. Compos Struct. 2010;92(3):647–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalamkarov AL, Georgiades AV, Rokkam SK, et al. Analytical and numerical techniques to predict carbon nanotubes properties. Int J Solids Struct. 2006;43(22–23):6832–6854. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namilae S, Chandra N. Multiscale model to study the effect of interfaces in carbon nanotube-based composites. J Eng Mater Technol. 2005;127(2):222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukanszky B. Influence of interface interaction on the ultimate tensile properties of polymer composites. Compos. 1990;21(3):255–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcsanyi B, Pukanszky B, Tudos F. Composition dependence of tensile yield stress in filled polymers. J Mater Sci Lett. 1998;7(2):160–162.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner HD, Lourie O, Feldman Y, et al. Stress-induced fragmentation of multiwall carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;72(2):188–190. DOI:10.1063/1.120680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Y. Effects of interphase on tensile strength of polymer/CNT nanocomposites by Kelly–Tyson theory. Mech Mater. 2015;85:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Y. A two-step method based on micromechanical models to predict the young’s modulus of polymer nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng. 2016;301(7):846–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Y. A simple technique for determination of interphase properties in polymer nanocomposites reinforced with spherical nanoparticles. Polymer. 2015;72:93–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydari-Meybodi M, Saber-Samandari S, Sadighi M. 3D multiscale modeling to predict the elastic modulus of polymer/nanoclay composites considering realistic interphase property. Compos Interfaces. 2016;23(7):641–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Sham ML, Wu J. Nanoscale characterization of interphase in silane treated glass fiber composites. Compos Part A. 2001;32(5):607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraji LS. Nanoscale carbon fiber-matrix interphase characterization with Atomic Force Microscopy [dissertation]. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SC, Prosser R, Sirk TW, et al. Glass fiber-epoxy interactions in the presence of silane: a molecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;542:148738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HF, Dwight DW, Huff NT. Effects of silane coupling agents on the interphase and performance of glass-fiber reinforced polymer. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57(8):975–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason J. A review of the analysis and characterisation of polymeric glass fibre sizings. Polym Test. 2020;85:106421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocaris PS. On the evaluation of adhesion between phases in fiber composites. Colloid Polym Sci. 1984;262(12):929–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov S, Mader E, Scheffler C, et al. Investigation of interfacial strength parameters in polymer matrix composites: compatibility and reproducibility. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. 2018;1(1):82–92. DOI:10.1016/j.aiepr.2018.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Jiang D, Ju S, et al. Determining the interphase thickness and properties in carbon fiber reinforced fast and conventional curing epoxy matrix composites using peak force atomic force microscopy. Compos Sci Technol. 2019;184:107877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munz M, Sturm H, Schulz E, et al. The scanning force microscope as a tool for the detection of local mechanical properties within the interphase of fibre reinforced polymers. Compos Part A. 1998;29(9–10):1251–1259. DOI:10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griswold C, Cross WM, Kjerngtron L, et al. Interphase variation in silane-treated glass-fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2005;19(3–5):279–290. DOI:10.1163/1568561054352649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing TD, Kumar R, Cross WM, et al. Determining the interphase thickness and properties in polymer matrix composites using phase imaging atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(14):1801–1812. DOI:10.1163/156856100743248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godara A, Raabe D, Green S. The influence of sterilization processes on the micromechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites for bone implant applications. Acta Biomater. 3(2):209. 2007 Jan 22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai K, Mader E, Muhle M. Interphase characterization in composites with new non-destructive methods. Compos Part A. 1998;29(9–10):1111–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao SL, Mader E. Characterisation of interphase nanoscale property variations in glass fiber reinforced polypropylene and epoxy resin composites. Compos Part A. 2002;33(4):559–576.‏.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riano L, Chailan JF, Joliff Y. Evolution of effective mechanical and interphase properties during natural ageing of glass-fibre/epoxy composites using micromechanical approach. Compos Struct. 2011;258:113399.
   Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou GC, Portan V, Kontaxis LC. Interrelation between fiber–matrix interphasial phenomena and flexural stress relaxation behavior of a glass fiber–polymer composite. Polymers. 2021;13(6):978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silling SA, Askari E. A mesh free method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct. 2005;83(17–18):1526–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madenci E. Otherkus E. Peridynamic theory and its applications. New York: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bobaru B, Ha YD. Adaptive refinement and multiscale modeling in 2D peridynamic. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng. 2011;9(6):635–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chen H, Spencer BW, et al. Thermomechanical peridynamic analysis with irregular non-uniform domain discretization. Eng Fract Mech. 2018;197:92–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day AS. An introduction to dynamic relaxation. Engr. 1965;219:218–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic B, Madenci E. An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory. Appl Fract Mech. 2010;53(3):194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly A, Zweben C, editors. Comprehensive composite materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 2000. chapte 1.08.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C, Xu W. Atomistic molecular modelling of cross-linked epoxy resin. Polymer. 2006;47(16):6004–6009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya P, Kumar S. Micromechanics of stress transfer through the interphase in fiber-reinforced composites. Mech Mater. 2015;89(2015):190–201.
   Google Scholar
• Wacker G, Bledzki AK, Chateb A. Effect of interphase on the transverse Young’s modulus of glass/epoxy composites. Compos Part A. 1998;29(5–6):619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech V, Palesch E, Lukes J. The glass fiber–polymer matrix interface/interphase characterized by nanoscale imaging techniques. Compos Sci Technol. 2013;83:22–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar