Age-related change in corneal biomechanical parameters in a healthy Caucasian population

References

• Strobbe E, Cellini M, Barbaresi U, Campos EC. Influence of age and gender on corneal biomechanical properties in a healthy Italian population. Cornea. 2014;33(9):968–972. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Wang D, Rama P, Campanelli M, Garway-Heath D. Experimental assessment of human corneal hysteresis. Curr Eye Res. 2008;33(3):205–213. doi:10.1080/02713680701882519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3026–3031. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(Suppl 2):S109–114. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83(4):709–720. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2006.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10):888–893. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090917-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(10):1491–1494. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-0864-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy A, Chung RS, Wu RY, et al. Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(7):1253–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of −19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):941–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(2):114–118. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01185.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1371–1375. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):257–262. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sen E, Elgin KU, Yüksekkaya P, et al. Age-related changes in biomechanical parameters of the cornea and intraocular pressure in a healthy Turkish population. Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(4):687–690. doi:10.3906/sag-1303-98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite MT, Alencar LM, Gore C, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between healthy blacks and whites using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(2):163–168.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Hautenauven F, Pourjavan S. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(2):e118–124. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02274.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):567–572. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(6):990–992. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36(6):508–513. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01828.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R, Kuang T-M, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1533–1540. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR. Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4189–4199. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3262–3268. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Relationship between age and intraocular pressure: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2002;30(3):173–175. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00519.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(7):2224–2228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Wang D, Kotecha A, Brown M, Garway-Heath D. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry using a nonlinear finite element ocular model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(10):1628–1640. doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9191-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):616–622. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(9):909–914. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181559db2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(7):581–588. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180640f40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, De Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123(6):767–772. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71125-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoramnia R, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU. Central and peripheral pachymetry measurements according to age using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(5):830–836. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A; Tajimi Study Group. Corneal thickness and relating factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Tajimi study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(1):152–154. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(9):1165–1169. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.112656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüfer F, Schröder A, Bader C, Erb C. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness: determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007;26(1):1–5. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000240095.95067.3f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar