Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ophthalmic Epidemiology Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
193
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Can ultra-wide field retinal imaging replace colour digital stereoscopy for glaucoma detection?

Nicola B. QuinnCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Augusto Azuara-BlancoCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
,
Katie GrahamCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
,
Ruth E. HoggCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UKORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9413-2669
ORCID Icon,
Ian S. YoungCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
&
Frank KeeCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Pages 63-69 | Received 26 Nov 2016, Accepted 01 Jul 2017, Published online: 18 Sep 2017

References

  • Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
  • NICE. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management of chronic open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg85. Published 2012. Accessed July 02, 2015.
  • Prum BE Jr, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern((R)) guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41–P111. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.053.
  • Arthur SN, Aldridge AJ, De Leon-Ortega J, McGwin G, Xie A, Girkin CA. Agreement in assessing cup-to-disc ratio measurement among stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs, HRT II, and stratus OCT. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(3):183–189. 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212216.19804.ee.
  • Arnalich-Montiel F, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, Sales-Sanz M, Cabarga C. Cup-to-disc ratio: agreement between slit-lamp indirect ophthalmoscopic estimation and stratus optical coherence tomography measurement. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(8):1041–1049. 10.1038/sj.eye.6702391.
  • Sung VC, Bhan A, Vernon SA. Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):196–202. 10.1136/bjo.86.2.196.
  • Lai E, Wollstein G, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography disc assessment in optic nerves with peripapillary atrophy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imag. 2003;34(6):498–504.
  • Lim CS, O’Brien C, Bolton NM. A simple clinical method to measure the optic disc size in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1996;5(4):241–245. 10.1097/00061198-199608000-00005.
  • Adegbehingbe BO, Ouertani AM. Confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic nerve head of glaucoma patients: inter-correlation of disc parameters. Ghana Med J. 2009;43(4):150–156.
  • Hasanreisoglu M, Priel E, Naveh L, et al. Digital versus film stereo-photography for assessment of the optic nerve head in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(3):238–242. 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31823298da.
  • Liegl R, Liegl K, Ceklic L, et al. Nonmydriatic ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (optomap) versus two-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2014;231(1):31–36. 10.1159/000355092.
  • Gloster J, Parry DG. Use of photographs for measuring cupping in the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58(10):850–862. 10.1136/bjo.58.10.850.
  • Hitchings RA, Genio C, Anderton S, Clark P. An optic disc grid: its evaluation in reproducibility studies on the cup/disc ratio. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67(6):356–361. 10.1136/bjo.67.6.356.
  • Sharma NK, Hitchings RA. A comparison of monocular and ‘stereoscopic’ photographs of the optic disc in the identification of glaucomatous visual field defects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67(10):677–680. 10.1136/bjo.67.10.677.
  • Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–242. 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238.
  • Wolfs RC, Ramrattan RS, Hofman A, De Jong PT. Cup-to-disc ratio: ophthalmoscopy versus automated measurement in a general population: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(8):1597–1601. 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90458-X.
  • Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141–151. 10.11613/BM.2015.015.
  • Harper R, Reeves B, Smith G. Observer variability in optic disc assessment: implications for glaucoma shared care. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20(4):265–273. 10.1016/S0275-5408(99)00092-7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.