References
- Woolstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557–1563. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98047-2.
- Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2255–2262. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1087.
- Galeana CS, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, Gokhale PA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1812–1818. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00768-0.
- Oliviera C, Harizman N, Girkin CA, et al. Axial length and optic disc size in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:37–39. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.102061.
- Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. The normal optic nerve head on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:25–33.
- Vernon SA. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in a normal elderly population: bridlington eye assessment project. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Science. 2005;46:2823–2828. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0087.
- Wang Y, Xu L, Zhang L, et al. Optic disc size in a population based study in Northern China- The Beijing eye study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:353–356. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081521.
- Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242–247. doi:10.1097/00061198-199508000-00005.
- Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121–127. doi:10.1097/00061198-199804000-00010.
- Nakamura H, Maeda T, Suzuki Y, et al. Scanning laser tomography to evaluate optic discs of normal eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999;43:410–414. doi:10.1016/S0021-5155(99)00089-1.
- Kashiwagi K, Tamura M, Abe K, et al. The influence of age, gender, refractive error, and optic disc configuration in Japanese normal eyes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:200–203. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002200.x.
- Strouthidis NG, White ET, Owen VMF, et al. Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomography and Heidelberg retina tomography II measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1427–1432. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.067298.
- Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:352–361. doi:10.1136/bjo.82.4.352.
- Kiriyama A, Ando A, Fukui C, et al. A comparison of optic disc topographic parameters in patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:541–545. doi:10.1007/s00417-003-0702-0.
- Woolstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, et al. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2272–2277.
- Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:26–33. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00084-9.
- Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucomas in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–242. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238.
- Scheurle AF, Schmidt E. Atlas of Laser scanning ophthalmoscopy. Springer — Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmBH & Co. 2003