References
- World Health Organization. World Report on Vision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019.
- Bourne R, Steinmetz J, Flaxman S, et al. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e130–e43. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3.
- Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, et al. Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected Presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013.
- Inequality in vision loss - Gender. The International Agency for the prevention of blindness. 2022. Available from: https://www.iapb.org/learn/vision-atlas/inequality-in-vision-loss/gender/. Accessed on 14 Mar 2022.
- Hickenbotham A, Roorda A, Steinmaus C, Glasser A. Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 1;53(6):3215–3220. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9791.
- Lu Q, He W, Murthy GV, et al. Presbyopia and near-vision impairment in rural northern China. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2300–2305. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6569.
- Patel I, Munoz B, Burke AG, et al. Impact of presbyopia on quality of life in a rural African setting. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):728–734. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.028.
- Bekibele CO, Gureje O. Impact of self-reported visual impairment on quality of life in the Ibadan study of ageing. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(5):612–615. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.124859.
- Ahmed M, Shefali MK, Husain L, et al. Vision Impairment and Productivity Among Female Garment Workers in Bangladesh: a cohort study. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2022;11(1):79–84. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000485.
- Reddy PA, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, et al. Effect of providing near glasses on productivity among rural Indian tea workers with presbyopia (PROSPER): a randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(9):e1019–e27. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30329-2.
- Naidoo KS, Jaggernath J, Chinanayi FS, Chan VF. Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2016;75(1):a357. doi:10.4102/aveh.v75i1.357.
- Laviers HR, Omar F, Jecha H, et al. Presbyopic spectacle coverage, willingness to pay for near correction, and the impact of correcting uncorrected presbyopia in adults in Zanzibar, East Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):1234–1241. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3154.
- Chan VF, Naidoo J, Chinanayi FS, Naidoo KS. Near vision correction and quality of life among textile factory workers in Durban. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2017;76(1):a38. doi:10.4102/aveh.v76i1.384.
- Assi L, Chamseddine F, Ibrahim P, et al. A Global Assessment of Eye Health and quality of life: a systematic review of systematic reviews. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(5):526–541. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0146.
- Women and men in Zanzibar: Facts and Figures | UN Women Data Hub. Available from:https://data.unwomen.org/publications/women-and-men-zanzibar-facts-and-figures. Accessed 10 Nov 2022
- Ellis A, Blackden M, Cutura J, et al. Gender and Economic Growth in Tanzania: Creating Opportunities for Women. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007. Available from: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/31d9b5b8-ea66-47f9-8e1f-c7e4c12441c4/GGA%2BTanzania.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-31d9b5b8-ea66-47f9-8e1f-c7e4c12441c4-jkC.Uyp. Accessed 1 Nov 2022
- Brannen CF An impact study of the Village Savings and Loan Association (VSLA) program in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Wesleyan University, USA; 2010. Available from: https://digitalcollections.wesleyan.edu/object/ir-830. Accessed 10 Nov 2022.
- Stone AA, Mackie C, editors. Panel on Measuring Subjective Well-Being in a Policy-Relevant Framework; Committee on National Statistics; Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council. Subjective Well-Being: Measuring Happiness, Suffering, and Other Dimensions of Experience [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);2013. Dec 18. PMID: 24432436
- Dolan P, White MP. How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2(1):71–85. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.
- Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
- Saleh M E-commerce in Africa [internet]. Statista. 2022 Jun 21. Available from: https://www.statista.com/topics/7288/e-commerce-in-africa/. Accessed on 21 Oct 2022
- Main Report - 2019/20 Household Budget Survey. Office of the Chief Government Statistician, Ministry of Finance and Planning. Zanzibar: Office of Chief Government Statistician; 2020.
- Zanzibar’s SDGs gender indicators [infographic online]. United Nations Entity for gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women ( UN Women); 2021. Available from: https://africa.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2021/08/infographics-on-zanzibars-sdg-gender-indicators. Accessed on 5 Sep 2022.
- United Nations. Gender Inequality Index [Internet]. Human Development Reports, United Nations Development Programme; 2022. Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/thematic-composite-indices/gender-inequality-index. Accessed on 5 Sep 2022.
- Inequalities [Internet]. The International Agency for the prevention of blindness. Available from: https://www.iapb.org/learn/vision-atlas/impact-and-economics/inequalities/. Accessed on 22 Jul 2022.