Units and Constituency in Prosodic Analysis: A Quantitative Assessment

References

• Abercrombie, D. (1964). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In D. Abercrombie, P. Fry, N. MacCarthy, & J. Trim (Eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones (pp. 216–222). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (1980). Prolegomena to Menzerath’s Law. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Glottometrika 2 (pp. 1–10). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (1992). Das Problem der Datenhomogenität [The problem of data homogeneity]. In B. Rieger (Ed.), Glottometrika 13 (pp. 287–298). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (2008). On the symbiosis of physicists and linguists. Romanian Rep. Phys., 60, 417–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Köhler, R. (2005). Aims and methods of quantitative linguistics. In G. Altmann, V. Levickij, & V. Perebyinis (Eds.), Problems of Quantitative Linguistics (pp. 12–41). Černivci: Ruta.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Meyer, P. (2005). Physicist’s look at language. In G. Altmann, V. Levickij, & V. Perebyinis (Eds.), Problems of Quantitative Linguistics (pp. 42–59). Černivci: Ruta.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Schwibbe, M. H. (1989). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz in informationsverarbeitenden Systemen [The Menzerath law in information processing systems]. Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann-Fitter. (1997). Iterative Fitting of Probability Distributions. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, J. (2010). On a conjecture about the fractal structure of language. J. Quant. Ling., 17, 101–122.10.1080/09296171003643189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, J., Benešová, M., Kubáček, L., & Vrbková, J. (2012). Methodological note on the fractal analysis of texts. J. Quant. Ling., 19, 1–31.10.1080/09296174.2011.608604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antić, G., Stadlober, E., Grzybek, P., & Kelih, E. (2006). Word length and frequency distributions in different text genres. In M. Spiliopoulou, R. Kruse, C. Borgelt, A. Nürnberger, & W. Gaul (Eds.), From data and information analysis to knowledge engineering (pp. 310–317). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/3-540-31314-1
   Google Scholar
• Auran, C., Bouzon, C., & Hirst, D. J. (2004). The Aix-MARSEC project: An evolutive database of spoken English. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on speech prosody (pp. 561–564). Japan: Nara.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, T. (1999). Readers as text processors and performers: A new formula for poetic intonation. Discourse Process., 28, 155–167.10.1080/01638539909545078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, K.-H. (Ed.). (2001). Häufigkeitsverteilungen in Texten [Frequency distributions in texts]. Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Best, K.-H. (2002). The distribution of rhythmic units in German short prose. Glottometrics, 3, 136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Best, K.-H. (2005). Längen rhythmischer Einheiten [Lengths of rhythmical units]. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik - Quantitative Linguistics. Ein internationales Handbuch (pp. 208–214). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Best, K.-H. (2011). Bibliographische Übersicht zum Göttinger Projekt zur Quantitativen Linguistik [Bibliographical overview of the Goettingen project on quantitative linguistics]. Retrieved July 25, 2011, from http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~kbest/litlist.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bouzon, C., & Hirst, D. (2004). Isochrony and prosodic structure in British English. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 223–226). Japan: Nara.
   Google Scholar
• Brierley, C., & Atwell, E. (2011). Non-traditional prosodic features for automated phrase break prediction. Lit. Ling. Comput., 26, 279–284.10.1093/llc/fqr023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, M. (1977). Ontology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, D. L. (1981). Sentence length in Greek Hexameter poetry. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Hexameter Studies (pp. 107–136). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, I. M. (2005). The parameters of the Altmann-Menzerath Law. J. Quant. Ling., 12, 41–52.10.1080/09296170500055301
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (1969). Review of Halliday 1967. J. Ling., 5, 309–315.10.1017/S0022226700002292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1969). Review of Halliday 1967. Language, 45, 378–393.10.2307/411669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybek, P. (2006). History and methodology of word length studies: The state of the art. In P. Grzybek (Ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues (pp. 15–90). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4068-7
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783111357447
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 5, 299–314.
   Google Scholar
• Jassem, W. (1952). Intonation of conversational English (educated Southern British). Wrocław: Nakładem Wrocławskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego.
   Google Scholar
• Jassem, W. (1996). A quantitative analysis of standard British English nuclear tones. J. Quant. Ling., 3, 229–243.10.1080/09296179608599630
   Google Scholar
• Kelih, E. (2006). Häufigkeiten von Graphemen und Lauten: Zwei Ebenen - ein Modell? (Re-Analyse einer Untersuchung von A.M. Peškovskij) [Frequencies of graphemes and sounds: two levels - one model? (Re-analysis of an investigation by A.M. Peskovskij)]. In P. Grzybek & R. Köhler (Eds.), Exact methods in the study of language and text (pp. 267–277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. (2013). Laws governing rank frequency and stratification in English texts. Glottometrics, 25, 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G. (1991). Prosodic labelling: The problem of tone group boundaries. In S. Johansson & A.-B. Stenström (Eds.), English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide (pp. 149–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G. (1992). Pitch contours and tones in the Lancaster/IBM Spoken English Corpus. In G. Leitner (Ed.), New Dimensions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 289–299). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G. (1994). Annotating large speech corpora: Building on the experience of Marsec. Hermes J. Ling., 13, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G., Wichmann, A., & Alderson, P. (Eds.). (1996). Working with Speech: Perspectives on Research into the Lancaster/IBM Spoken English Corpus. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik [On linguistic synergetics: Structure and dynamics of lexis]. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1987). Systems theoretical linguistics. Theor. Linguist., 14, 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., Altmann, G. (1997). On explorative methodology concerning probability distributions. In SoftStat’97: Advances in Statistical Software 6, pp. 335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., Altmann, G., & Piotrowski, R. (Eds.). (2005). Quantitative Linguistik - Quantitative Linguistics. Ein internationales Handbuch. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, D. R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 311–340.10.1017/S0952675700000671
   Google Scholar
• Marbe, K. (1904). Über den Rhythmus der Prosa [On prose rhythm]. Giessen: J. Ricker’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Menzerath, P. (1954). Die Architektonik des deutschen Wortschatzes [The architectonics of the German vocabulary]. Bonn: Dümmler.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, I.-I., Altmann, G., Grzybek, P., Jayaram, B. D., Köhler, R., Krupa, V., … Vidya, M. N. (2009). Word Frequency Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, I.-I., Mačutek, J., & Altmann, G. (2009). Aspects of word frequencies. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, T., van Hout, R., & Ernestus, M. (2004). Pitfalls in corpus research. Computers and the Humanities, 38, 343–362.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, P., Knowles, G., Varadi, T., & Arnfield, S. (1993). MARSEC: A machine-readable spoken english corpus. J. Int. Phon. Assoc., 23, 47–54.10.1017/S0025100300004849
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. J., Knowles, G. 1988. Manual of information to accompany the SEC Corpus: The machine-readable corpus of Spoken English. Retrieved July 2, 2013, from http://icame.uib.no/sec/
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, G., & Altmann, G. (1999). Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions. Essen: Stamm.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Altmann, G. (2003). Text stratification. J. Quant. Ling., 10, 275–292.10.1080/09296170512331383605
   Google Scholar