Conditional Inference Tree Modelling of Competing Motivators of the Positioning of Concessive Clauses: The Case of a Non-native Corpus

References

• Aarts, B. (1988). Clauses of concession in written present-day British English. Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 39–85.10.1177/007542428802100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Losongco, A., Wasow, T., & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76, 28–55.10.1353/lan.2000.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden Eine Anwendungsorientierte Einfuhrung. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. C. (2001). The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. London: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Behaghel, O. (1930). Von deutscher Wortstellung. Zeitschrift Für Deutschkunde, 44, 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R. J Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Birner, B. J., & Ward, G. (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. New York, NY: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.40
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J., & Noonan, M. (2002). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.110
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1984). How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics (pp. 437–449).10.3765/bls.v10i0.1936
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. (2008). Ron Cowan-The Teacher’s Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofaro, S. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ö. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language, 77, 433–455.10.1353/lan.2001.0152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics, 43, 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 465–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: A cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use In P. Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (pp. 21–52). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554278
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance -based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain, 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 2). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. A. (2000). The relative ordering of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond manner-place-time. Language Variation and Change, 11, 231–266.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15, 651–674.10.1198/106186006X133933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1999). Syntactic structures: Properties and interrelations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 46–57.10.1076/jqul.6.1.46.4137
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. (2015). Adverbial clauses. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). (pp. 185–188). New York, NY: Elsevier Ltd.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.52029-7
   Google Scholar
• Miestamo, M. (2006). On the feasibility of complexity metrics. In K. Kerge & M. Sepper (Eds.), FinEst Linguistics, Proceedings of the Annual Finnish and Estonian Conference of Linguistics. Tallin, 2004, May 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, E. (1980). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatic (pp. 223–256). New York, NY: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh Ahangar, F. (2011). A contrastive study of time sequence in Persian and English complex sentences ( Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Tehran: University of Tehran.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliamonte, S. A., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24, 135–178. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S. A., Longacre, R. A., & Hwang, S. J. J. (2007). Adverbial clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Vol. 2, pp. 237–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, J.-C. (2004). Initial and final position for adverbial clauses in English: The constructional basis of the discursive and syntactic differences. Linguistics, 42, 819–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vulanovic, R. (2007). On measuring language complexity as relative to the conveyed linguistic information. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 20, 399–427.
   Google Scholar
• Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, D., & Kerz, E. (2013). The positioning of concessive adverbial clauses in English 1. English Language and Linguistics, 17, 1–22.10.1017/S1360674312000305
   Google Scholar