A quantitative Inquiry into the Keywords between Primary and Reference Arabic Corpora

References

• Al-Mujaiwel, Sultan. (2016). Free/open KACSTAC and its processing tools: Lexical resources for Arabic lexicogrammatical microstructures based on collocational indicators. In Francisco Alonso Almeida, Ivalla Ortega Barrera, Elena Quintana Toledo, & Margarita E. Sánchez Cuervo (eds.), Input a word, analyze the World: Selected approaches to corpus linguistics (pp. 153–170). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Thubaity, A., & Al-Subaie, A. (2015). Effect of word segmentation on Arabic text classification. In The 19th Proceedings of the International Conference on Asian Language Processing (pp. 127–131). Suzhou, China: Asian Language Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Thubaity, A., Khan, M., Al-Mazrua, M., & Al-Mousa, M. (2013). New language resources for Arabic: Corpus containing more than two million words and a corpus processing tool. In The 17th International Conference of Asian Language Processing (pp. 67–70). Urumuqi, Chain.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2004). Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency and Sense in Keywords Analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32, 346–359.10.1177/0075424204269894
   Google Scholar
• Berber-Sardinha, T. (2000). Comparing corpora with WordSmith tools: How large must the reference corpus be? In Proceedings of the workshop on comparing corpora-Volume 9 (pp. 7–13). Stroudsburg, PA (USA): Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1117729
   Google Scholar
• Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20, 139–173.10.1075/ijcl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 121–1248). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, G. Y. (2011). Choosing a reference corpus for keyword calculation. Linguistic Research, 28, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, G. Y., & Lee, S. W. (2008). A corpus-based analysis of the language of English news in Korea. The Journal of Studies in Language, 23, 601–619.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, Ł. (2013). Register variation across English pharmaceutical texts: A corpus-driven study of keywords, lexical bundles and phrase frames in patient information leaflets and summaries of product characteristics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 391–401.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.661
   Google Scholar
• Gries, S. T. (2015). Some Current quantitative problems in corpus linguistics and a sketch of some solutions. Language & Linguistics, 16, 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemppanen, H. (2004). Keywords and ideology in translated history texts: A corpus-based analysis. Across Languages and Cultures, 5, 89–106.10.1556/Acr.5.2004.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A. (2012). Getting to know your corpus. In P. Sojka, A. Horak, I. Kopecek, & K. Pala (Eds.), International conference on text, speech and dialogue (pp. 3–15). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2
   Google Scholar
• Mahlberg, M. (2009). Patterns in news stories. In L. Lombardo (Ed.), Using corpora to learn about language and discourse (pp. 99–132). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. Abington, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T. (2009). Keywords and moral panics: Mary Whitehouse and media censorship. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction (pp. 92–124). Oxford: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13, 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Keyword and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/scl.22
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C., Ziebland, S., & Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2577–2590.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribble, C. (2000). Genres, keywords, teaching: Towards a pedagogic account of the language of project proposals. In L. Burnard, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (pp. 75–90). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar