Dynamic Lexical Features of PhD Theses across Disciplines: A Text Mining Approach

References

• Ädel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, L. (2017). AntFileConverter (version 1.2.1) [computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD theses introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2015). Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2008a). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor”: Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. L. (2014). Text analysis with R for students of literature. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase, T. (2018). Rhetorical structure of the introductions of applied linguistics PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khany, R., & Kafshgar, N. B. (2016). Analysing texts through their linguistic properties: A cross-disciplinary study. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 23(3), 278–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations to power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, W. (2015). Language and complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as foreign languages. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J. (2014). Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments. Higher Education, 67(5), 533–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, B. S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. M. (2014). Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 66–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Xu, C., & Liang, J. (2017). Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 171–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of metadiscourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco, M. J. L. (2000). Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, L. (2016). Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mur Dueñas, P. (2007). ‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Mur-Dueñas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3068–3079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, M. (2017). Move-step structures of literature Ph.D. Theses in the Japanese and UK higher education. Journal of Writing Research, 8(3), 469–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, X., Chen, X., & Liu, H. (2018). Harmony in diversity: The language codes in English-Chinese poetry translation. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(1), 128–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479–497.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., & Altmann, G. (2006). Some aspects of word frequencies. Glottometrics, 13, 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., & Altmann, G. (2007). Writer’s view of text generation. Glottometrics, 15, 71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., Čech, R., & Altmann, G. (2012). Some geometric properties of slovak poetry. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 2, 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, M. D. (2015). Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines (linguistics, economics and medicine). Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Soler-Monreal, C. (2015). Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tankó, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar