Synergetic Properties of Lexical Structures in Chinese and English

References

• Altmann, G., & Köhler, R. (1995). “Language forces” and synergetic modelling of language phenomena. In P. Schmidt (Ed.), Glottometrika (Vol. 15, pp. 62–76). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Čech, R., & Mačutek, J. (2010). On quantitative analysis of valency in Czech. In P. Grzybek, E. Kelih, & J. Mačutek (Eds.), Text and language. Structures · functions · interrelations. Quantitative perspectives (pp. 21–29). Praesens Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Čech, R., Mačutek, J., & Žabokrtský, Z. (2011). The role of syntax in complex networks: Local and global importance of verbs in a syntactic dependency network. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 390(36), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.05.027
   Google Scholar
• Čech, R., Mačutek, J., Žabokrtský, Z., & Horák, A. (2017). A. Polysemy and synonymy in syntactic dependency networks. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(1), 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čech, R., Pajas, P., & Mačutek, J. (2010). Full valency. Verb valency without distinguishing complements and adjuncts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(4), 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Liang, J., Liu, H., & Aronoff, M. (2015). How does word length evolve in written Chinese? PLos One, 10(9), e0138567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Liu, H. (2016). How to measure word length in spoken and written Chinese. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 23(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2015.1071147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coloma, G. (2014). Towards a synergetic statistical model of language phonology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 21(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2014.882184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X., Qu, Y., & Feng, Z. (2018). A synergetic approach to the relationship between the length and frequency among English multiword formulaic sequences. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1338119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., Riordan, O., & Bollobs, B. (2005). The consequences of Zipf’s law for syntax and symbolic reference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 272(1562), 561–565. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2957
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., & Solé, R. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100(3), 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0335980100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Zhang, H., & Liu, H. (2014). Synergetic properties of Chinese verb valency. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2013.856132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieseking, K. (1998). Untersuchungen zur Synergetik der englischen Lexik. In R. Köhler (Ed.), Korpuslinguistische Untersuchungen zur quantitativen und systemtheoretischen Linguistik (pp. 387–433). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Grotjahn, R., & Altmann, G. (1993). Modeling the distribution of word length: Some methodological problems. In R. Köhler & B. Rieger (Eds), Contributions to quantitative linguistics: Proceedings of the first international conference on quantitative linguistics, QUALICO (pp. 141–153). WVT.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybek, P. (2006). History and methodology of word length studies. In P. Grzybek (Ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues (pp. 15–90). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerl, R. (1991). Untersuchungen zur Struktur der Lexik: Aufbau eines Basismodells. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerl, R., & Sambor, J. (1993). Synergetic studies in polish. In R. Köhler & B. Rieger (Eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics (pp. 11–31). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hornischer, L. (2020). Logics of synonymy. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49(4), 767–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09537-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., & Liu, H. (2015). The effects of sentence length on dependency distance, dependency direction and the implications—based on a parallel English—Chinese dependency treebank. Language Sciences, 50, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2018). The lexicon and the noisy channel: Words are shaped to avoid confusion. Glottometrics, 43, 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik. Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1999). Syntactic structures: Properties and interrelations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 6(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.6.1.46.4137
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2005a). Properties of lexical units and systems. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch (Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook) (pp. 305–313). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2005b). Synergetic linguistics. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch (Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook) (pp. 760–775). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2007). Quantitative analysis of syntactic structures in the framework of synergetic linguistics. In A. Mehler & R. Köhler (Eds.), Aspects of automatic text analysis (pp. 191–210). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2012). Quantitative syntax analysis. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., & Altmann, G. (1993). Begriffsdynamik und Lexikonstruktur. In F. Beckmann & G. Heyer (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis des Lexikons (pp. 173–190). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Zhu, Y., Jiang, S., Cai, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Exploring Chinese lexical differences based on synergetic-linguistic model. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(4), 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2009). Probability distribution of dependencies based on a Chinese dependency treebank. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 16(3), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170902975742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2011). Quantitative properties of English verb valency. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 18(3), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2011.581849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2017). 计量语言学导论 [An introduction to quantitative linguistics]. Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. -I., Naumann, S., Kelih, E., Rovenchak, A., Overbeck, A., & Sanada, H. (2013). Word length: Aspects and languages. In R. Köhler & G. Altmann (Eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 3. Dedicated to Karl-Heinz Best on the occasion of his 70th birthday (pp. 224–281). RAM.
   Google Scholar
• Prün, C., & Steiner, P. (2005). Quantitative Morphologie. Eigenschaften der Morphologischen Einheiten und Systeme. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistics. An International Handbook (pp. 227–242). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, U. (1991). Diversification processes in grammar. An introduction. In U. Rothe (Ed.), Diversification processes in language: Grammar (pp. 33–46). MRM.
   Google Scholar
• Sanada-Yogo, H. (1999). Analysis of Japanese vocabulary by the theory of synergetic linguistics. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 6(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.6.3.239.6161
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2013). Word length in Chinese. In R. Köhler & G. Altmann (Eds.), Issues in quantitative linguistics 3. Dedicated to Karl-Heinz Best on the occasion of his 70th birthday (pp. 39–53). RAM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2014). Synergetic studies on some properties of lexical structures in Chinese. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 21(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2014.882186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2017). The effects of genre on dependency distance and dependency direction. Language Sciences, 59(Complete), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, G., & Altmann, G. (1999). Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions. Stamm.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J., & Liu, H. (2021). Morphology and word order in Slavic languages: Insights from annotated corpora. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 4(4), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2021.4.131-159
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Altmann, G. (2001). Beziehung zwischen Synonymie und Polysemie. In S. Ondrejovič & M. Považan (Eds.), Lexicographica 99 (pp. 226–229). Veda.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar