Publication Cover
Child Neuropsychology
A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence
Volume 25, 2019 - Issue 8
682
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Are we documenting performance validity testing in pediatric neuropsychological assessments? A brief report

, &
Pages 1035-1042 | Received 03 Jul 2018, Accepted 28 Dec 2018, Published online: 24 Jan 2019

References

  • Baker, D. A., Connery, A. K., Kirk, J. W., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2014). Embedded performance validity indicators within the California verbal learning test-children’s version. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(1), 116–127.
  • Baker, R., Donders, J., & Thompson, E. (2000). Assessment of incomplete effort with the California verbal learning test. Applied Neuropsychology, 7(2; 2), 111–114.
  • Blaskewitz, N., Merten, T., & Kathmann, N. (2008). Performance of children on symptom validity tests: TOMM, MSVT, and FIT. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(4), 379–391.
  • Brooks, B. L., Fay-McClymont, T. B., MacAllister, W. S., Vasserman, M., & Sherman, E. M. (2018). A new kid on the block: The memory validity profile (MVP) in children with neurological conditions. Child Neuropsychology, Advance online publication, DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2018.1477929.
  • Brooks, B. L., & Ploetz, D. M. (2015). Embedded performance validity on the CVLT-C for youth with neurological disorders. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(3), 200–206.
  • Brooks, B. L., Ploetz, D. M., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2016). A survey of neuropsychologists’ use of validity tests with children and adolescents. Child Neuropsychology, 22(8), 1001–1020.
  • Brooks, B. L., Sherman, E. M., & Krol, A. L. (2012). Utility of TOMM trial 1 as an indicator of effort in children and adolescents. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(1), 23–29.
  • Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., … Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426.
  • Carone, D. A. (2008). Children with moderate/severe brain damage/dysfunction outperform adults with mild-to-no brain damage on the medical symptom validity test. Brain Injury, 22(12), 960–971.
  • Carone, D. A. (2014). Young child with severe brain volume loss easily passes the word memory test and medical symptom validity test: Implications for mild TBI. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(1), 146–162.
  • Constantinou, M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2003). Using the TOMM for evaluating children’s effort to perform optimally on neuropsychological measures. Child Neuropsychology, 9(2), 81–90.
  • Courtney, J. C., Dinkins, J. P., Allen, L. M., 3rd, & Kuroski, K. (2003). Age related effects in children taking the computerized assessment of response bias and word memory test. Child Neuropsychology, 9(2), 109–116.
  • Donders, J. (2005). Performance on the test of memory malingering in a mixed pediatric sample. Child Neuropsychology, 11(2), 221–227.
  • Faust, D., Hart, K. J., & Guilmette, T. J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 578–582.
  • Faust, D., Hart, K. J., Guilmette, T. J., & Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists’ capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(5), 508–515.
  • Gidley Larson, J. C., Flaro, L., Peterson, R. L., Connery, A. K., Baker, D. A., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2015). The medical symptom validity test measures effort not ability in children: A comparison between mild TBI and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(3), 192–199.
  • Green, P. (2004). Green’s medical symptom validity test (MSVT) for Microsoft Windows: User’s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green’s Publishing.
  • Green, P., & Flaro, L. (2003). Word memory test performance in children. Child Neuropsychology, 9(3), 189–207.
  • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Conference Participants. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129.
  • Kirk, J. W., Harris, B., Hutaff-Lee, C. F., Koelemay, S. W., Dinkins, J. P., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2011). Performance on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) among a large clinic-referred pediatric sample. Child Neuropsychology, 17(3), 242–254.
  • Kirkwood, M. W. (2015). Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment: Evaluating exaggeration, feigning, and noncredible effort. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Kirkwood, M. W., Hargrave, D. D., & Kirk, J. W. (2011). The value of the WISC-IV digit span subtest in detecting noncredible performance during pediatric neuropsychological examinations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(5), 377–384.
  • Kirkwood, M. W., & Kirk, J. W. (2010). The base rate of suboptimal effort in a pediatric mild TBI sample: Performance on the medical symptom validity test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(5), 860–872.
  • Kirkwood, M. W., Peterson, R. L., Connery, A. K., Baker, D. A., & Grubenhoff, J. A. (2014). Postconcussive symptom exaggeration after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics, 133(4), 643–650.
  • Lichtenstein, J. D., Erdodi, L. A., & Linnea, K. S. (2017). Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California verbal learning test–children’s version. Child Neuropsychology, 23(3), 284–299.
  • Loughan, A. R., & Perna, R. (2014). Performance and specificity rates in the test of memory malingering: An investigation into pediatric clinical populations. Applied Neuropsychology Child, 3(1), 26–30.
  • MacAllister, W. S., Nakhutina, L., Bender, H. A., Karantzoulis, S., & Carlson, C. (2009). Assessing effort during neuropsychological evaluation with the TOMM in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Child Neuropsychology, 15(6), 521–531.
  • MacAllister, W. S., & Vasserman, M. (2015). Ethical considerations in pediatric validity testing. In M. Kirkwood (Ed.), Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment: Evaluating exaggeration, feigning, and noncredible effort (pp. 164–181). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776.
  • Perna, R., & Loughan, A. R. (2014). The influence of effort on neuropsychological performance in children: Is performance on the TOMM indicative of neuropsychological ability? Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 3(1), 31–37.
  • Ploetz, D. M., Mazur-Mosiewicz, A., Kirkwood, M. W., Sherman, E. M., & Brooks, B. L. (2016). Performance on the test of memory malingering in children with neurological conditions. Child Neuropsychology, 22(2), 133–142.
  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.
  • Schneider, H. E., Kirk, J. W., & Mahone, E. M. (2014). Utility of the test of memory malingering (TOMM) in children ages 4–7 years with and without ADHD. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(7), 1133–1145.
  • Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223.
  • Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40.
  • Vekaria, P., Vasserman, M., & MacAllister, W. (2013, abstract). The utility of the TOMM and reliable digit span as performance validity measures in children and adolescents. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(6), 600.
  • Welsh, A. J., Bender, H. A., Whitman, L. A., Vasserman, M., & Macallister, W. S. (2012). Clinical utility of reliable digit span in assessing effort in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(7), 735–741.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.