Music Generation from Statistical Models of Harmony

References

• Allan, M. & Williams, C.K.I. (2005). Harmonising chorales by probabilistic inference. In L.K. Saul, Y. Weiss & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 17, pp. 25–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biyiko\v{g}lu, K.M. (2003). A Markov model for chorale harmonization. In R. Kopiez, A.C. Lehmann, I. Wolther & C. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Triennial European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM) Conference (pp. 81–84). Osnabrück: epOs-Music.
   Google Scholar
• Cherla, S., Weyde, T., & d’Avila Garcez, A. (2014). Multiple viewpoint melodic prediction with fixed-context neural networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR) Conference (pp. 101–106). Canada: International Society for Music Information Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Chordia, P., Sastry, A., & Şentürk, S. (2011). Predictive tabla modelling using variable-length Markov and hidden Markov models. Journal of New Music Research, 40 (2), 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuan, C.-H., & Chew, E. (2011). Generating and evaluating musical harmonizations that emulate style. Computer Music Journal, 35 (4), 64–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, J.G., & Witten, I.H. (1984). Data compression using adaptive coding and partial string matching. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-32 (4), 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, D. (2002). Representation and discovery of vertical patterns in music. In C. Anagnostopoulou, M. Ferrand & A. Smaill (Eds.), Music and Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of ICMAI 2002 (LNAI Vol. 2445, pp. 32–42). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, D. (2003). Music generation from statistical models. In Proceedings of the AISB 2003 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences (pp. 30–35). London: AISB Society.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, D. (2013). Multiple viewpoint systems for music classification. Journal of New Music Research, 42 (1), 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, D., & Witten, I.H. (1995). Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research, 24 (1), 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., Fukayama, S., Goto, M., Munekata, N., & Ono, T. (2014, September). AutoChorusCreator: Four-part chorus generator with musical feature control, using search spaces constructed fromrules of music theory. Paper presented at the Joint International Computer Music Conference and Sound and Music Conference. Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Farbood, M. & Schoner, B. (2001, September). Analysis and synthesis of Palestrina-style counterpoint using Markov chains. Paper presented at the International Computer Music Conference. Havana, Cuba.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J.D. & Vico, F.J. (2013). AI methods in algorithmic composition: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 48, 513–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. (2013). Automatic harmonization using a hidden semi-Markov model. In Musical Metacreation: Papers from the 2013 AIIDE Workshop (pp. 48-54). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, T., Roy, P., & Pachet, F. (2014). Predicting the composer and style of jazz chord progressions. Journal of New Music Research, 43 (3), 276–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herremans, D., Sörensen, K., & Conklin, D. (2014, September). Sampling the extrema from statistical models of music with variable neighbourhood search. Paper presented at the Joint International Computer Music Conference and Sound and Music Conference. Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J.H. (2000). Speech and language processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr., C.D., & Vecchi, M.P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, M.Y. & Lucas, S.M. (2006). Evolving musical sequences with n-gram based trainable fitness functions. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 601–608). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pachet, F. & Roy, P. (2011). Markov constraints: Steerable generation of Markov sequences. Constraints, 16 (2), 148–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M.T. (2005). The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melodic structure in music perception and composition (PhD thesis). Department of Computing, City University, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M.T., Conklin, D., & Wiggins, G.A. (2005). Methods for combining statistical models of music. In U.K. Wiil (Ed.), Computer music modelling and retrieval (pp. 295–312). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M.T., Müllensiefen, D., & Wiggins, G.A. (2010). Melodic grouping in music information retrieval: New methods and applications. In Z.W. Ras & A. Wieczorkowska (Eds.), Advances in music information retrieval (pp. 364–388). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M.T., & Wiggins, G.A. (2006). Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception, 23 (5), 377–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M.T., & Wiggins, G.A. (2007, June). Evaluating cognitive models of musical composition. Paper presented at the 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Piston, W. (1976). Harmony. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford, D., Wiggins, G.A., & Mellish, C. (1999). Statistical learning of harmonic movement. Journal of New Music Research, 28 (2), 150–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, K., Wiggins, G.A., & Pearce, M.T. (2007). Towards greater objectivity in music theory: Information-dynamic analysis of minimalist music. Musicae Scientiae, 11 (2), 295–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raczyński, S.A., Fukayama, S., & Vincent, E. (2013). Melody harmonization with interpolated probabilistic models. Journal of New Music Research, 42 (3), 223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, C., & Stoddard, J. (2003). Harmonic analysis with probabilistic graphical models. Proceedings of the 4th International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR) Conference (pp. 177–181). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrmeier, M. & Graepel, T. (2012). Comparing feature-based models of harmony. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Computer Music Modelling and Retrieval (pp. 357–370). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., & Kitahara, T. (2014). Four-part harmonization using Bayesian networks: Pros and cons of introducing chord nodes. Journal of New Music Research, 43 (3), 331–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan Williams, R. (Ed.). (1933). The English hymnal (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbi, A.J. (1967). Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimal decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13, 260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whorley, R.P. (2013). The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melody and harmony. (PhD thesis). Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Whorley, R.P., & Conklin, D. (2015). Improved iterative random walk for four-part harmonization. In T. Collins, D. Meredith & A. Volk (Eds.), Mathematics and computation in music (LNAI 9110, pp. 64–70). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whorley, R.P., Wiggins, G.A., Rhodes, C., & Pearce, M.T. (2013). Multiple viewpoint systems: Time complexity and the construction of domains for complex musical viewpoints in the harmonization problem. Journal of New Music Research, 42 (3), 237–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, I.H., & Bell, T.C. (1989). The zero frequency problem: Estimating the probability of novel events in adaptive text compression (Technical Report, No. 89/347/09). Calgary, Canada: The University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S.-Z. (2010). Hidden semi-Markov model. Artificial Intelligence, 174 (2), 215–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar