The CrossSong Puzzle: Developing a Logic Puzzle for Musical Thinking

References

• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cannam, C. (2012). Rubber band library. Software released under GNU General Public License (version1.8.1).
   Google Scholar
• Ciconia, J. (1993). De Proportionibus. In O. B. Ellsworth (Ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crute, T. D. (2010). In Effective use of games and puzzles in the chemistry classroom. Making chemistry relevant: Strategies for including all students in a learner-sensitive classroom environment (pp. 267–281). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY, USA: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. E. P., Hamel, P., Yoshii, K., & Goto, M. (2014). AutoMashUpper: Automatic creation of multi-song music mashups. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22, 1726–1737.
   Google Scholar
• Dubus, G., Hansen, K. F., & Bresin, R. (2012). An overview of sound and music applications for Android available on the market. Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 541–546), Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Egozy, E. (2016). Approaches to musical expression in Harmonix video games. In J. B. L. Smith, E. Chew, & G. Assayag (Eds.), Mathemusical Conversations: Mathematics and Computation in Music Performance and Composition (pp. 20–36). Singapore: Imperial College Press and World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, J., Holzer, M., Ruepp, O., & Sehnke, F. (2012). On computer integrated rationalized crossword puzzle manufacturing. In E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, & F. Luccio (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (pp. 131–141). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, J. (2000). Automatic audio segmentation using a measure of audio novelty. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (pp. 452–455). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, M. L., Frank, M., Halpin, M. P., & Torrance, M. C. (1990). Search lessons learned from crossword puzzles. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 210–215). Boston, MA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goto, M., Hashiguchi, H., Nishimura, T., & Oka, R. (2002). RWC Music Database: Popular, classical, and jazz music databases. Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 287–288). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Goto, M., Hashiguchi, H., Nishimura, T., & Oka, R. (2003). RWC Music Database: Music Genre Database and Musical Instrument Sound Database. Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 229–230). Baltimore, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, M. L. (1998). Secrets of the MIT Mystery Hunt: An exploration of the theory underlying the construction of a multi-puzzle contest (Bachelor’s thesis). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S., & Buxton, B. (2008). Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 111–120). Florence, Italy: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., Kim, Y. E., & Turnbull, D. (2010). Beat-sync-mash-coder: A web application for real-time creation of beat-synchronous music mashups. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 437–440), Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M. (2002). The educational benefits of videogames. Education and Health, 20, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hainsworth, S. (2006). Beat tracking and musical metre analysis. In A. Klapuri & M. Davy (Eds.), Signal processing methods for music transcription (pp. 101–29). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K.F., Hiraga, R., Li, Z., & Wang, H. (2013). Music puzzle: An audio-based computer game that inspires to train listening abilities. In Advances in computer entertainment. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 8253, pp. 540–543). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, S. A. (1978). Dice music in the eighteenth century. Music & Letters, 59, 180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N. J. (2011). Musical beauty and information compression: Complex to the ear but simple to the mind? BMC Research Notes, 4, 9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan, A., Scheftelowitsch, D., Lahni, J., Hartwecker, J., Kuchem, M., Walter-Huber, M., ..., Preuss, M., (2012). BeatTheBeat: Music-based procedural content generation in a mobile game. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (pp. 320–327). Granada, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, F., Böck, S., & Widmer, G. (2013). Rhythmic pattern modeling for beat and downbeat tracking in musical audio. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (pp. 227–232). Curitiba, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Lin, Y., Yao, Z., Lee, F., & Wu, J. (2015). Automatic mashup creation by considering both vertical and horizontal mashabilities. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (pp. 399–405). Málaga, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Liu, I., Jang, J. R., & Wu, J. (2015). Audio musical dice game: A user-preference-aware medley generating system. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 11, 52:1–52:24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J. J., & Stewart, L. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS ONE, 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Stewart, L., & Musil, J. J. (2013). Goldsmiths musical sophistication index (gold-MSI) v1.0: Technical report and documentation [Revision 0.3]. Technical report, Goldsmiths. University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2015). Music structure analysis. Fundamentals of music processing: Audio, analysis, algorithms, applications (pp. 167–236). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nierhaus, G. (2009). Algorithmic Composition: Paradigms of Automated Music Generation. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber, J. (2009). Driven by compression progress: A simple principle explains essential aspects of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes. Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems (pp. 48–76). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. B. L., Burgoyne, J. A., Fujinaga, I., De Roure, D., & Downie, J. S. (2011). Design and creation of a large-scale database of structural annotations. Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (pp. 555–560). Miami, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Upham, F., & Farbood, M. (2013). Coordination in musical tension and liking ratings of scrambled music. Presented at the Society for Music Perception and Cognition Conference (pp. 148), Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, L., & Subramanian, S. (2013). The viability of the web browser as a computer music platform. Computer Music Journal, 37, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar