Musical Organics: A Heterarchical Approach to Digital Organology

References

• Bacon, F. (1850). The works of Lord Bacon with an introductory essay and a portrait. London: Henry G. Bohn.
   Google Scholar
• Bakan, M. B., Bryant, W., Li, G., Martinelli, D., & Vaughn, K. (1990). Demystifying and classifying electronic music instruments. Selected reports in ethnomusicology: Volume VII—Issues in organology (pp. 37–64). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (2012). The social life of musical instruments. Ethnomusicology, 56, 363–395.10.5406/ethnomusicology.56.3.0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birley, M., & Myers, A. (2015, July 3–4). A revision of the Hornbostel Sachs classification in 2011 by the MIMO Consortium. Proceedings of a Conference organised by the Levi Foundation, Venice.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, D., Fiebrink, R., Malloch, J., & Wanderley, M. (2005). Towards a dimension space for musical artifacts. Proceedings of NIME 2005. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Borges, J. L. (1964). The analytical language of John Wilkins. In (J. L. Borges, Trans.), Other inquisitions (101–158). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. (2000). A social history of knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, V. (1945, July). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly.
   Google Scholar
• Cance, C., Genevois, H., & Dubois, D. (2009). What is instrumentality in new digital musical devices? A contribution from cognitive linguistics & psychology. Proceedings of the fifth conference on interdisciplinary musicology, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, K. (2001). People, objects, meaning: Recent work on the study and collection of musical instruments. The Galpin Society Journal, 54, 219–232.10.2307/842454
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, L. (2002). Book of the month: Athanius Kircher—Musurgia Universalis. Glasgow: Glasgow University Library—Special Collections Department. Retrieved Jan 2017, from https://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/month/nov2002.html
   Google Scholar
• Dräger, H. H. (1948). Prinzip einer Systematik der Musikinstrumente. Kassel: Bärenreiter.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2009). Speclab: Digital aesthetics and projects in speculative computing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226165097.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2013). Performative materiality and theoretical approaches to interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly., 7, 39. Retrieved Jul 2017, from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000143/000143.html
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2014). Graphesis: Visual forms of knowledge production. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (2014). From the tree to the labyrinth: Historical studies on the sign and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674728165
   Google Scholar
• Elschek, O. (1969). System of graphical and symbolic signs for the typology of aerophones (in Czech, German and English). Bratislava: Vydatelstv Slovenskej Academi Vied.
   Google Scholar
• Elschek, O., & Stockman, E. (1969). Zur Typologie der Volksmusikinstrumente. SIMP, 1, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, W. (2015). Digital textuality: The implicit (re-)turn of the gutenberg galaxy (Report from the Gutenberg Galaxy). Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1989). The order of things. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Hardjowirogo, S. (2017). Instrumentality. On the construction of instrumental identity. In T. Bovermann, A. de Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical instruments in the 21st century (pp. 9–24). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-2951-6
   Google Scholar
• Heyde, H. (1975). Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems der Musikinstrumente. Leipzig: Deutscher Verlag für Musik, VEB.
   Google Scholar
• Heyde, H. (2001). Methods of organology and proportions in brass wind instrument making. Historic Brass Society Journal, 13, 1–51.10.2153/0120010011001
   Google Scholar
• Hood, M. (1971). The ethnomusicologist. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hooshmandrad, P. (2004). Performing the belief: Sacred musical practice of the Kurdish Ahl-I Haqq of Gūrān (PhD Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• von Hornbostel, E. M., & Sachs, C. (1961). Classification of musical instruments. The Galpin Society Journal, 14, 3–29. Originally published in 1914 as Systematik der Musikinstrumente. Ein Versuch. In Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, xlvi, 553–590.10.2307/842168
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Y. (2016). On the existence of digital objects. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816698905.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. W. (2011). From scientific instruments to musical instruments: The tuning fork, the metronome, and the siren. In T. Pinch & K. Bijsterveld (Eds.), The handbook of sound studies (pp. 201–223). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M. (1995). An ethnomusicology of musical instruments: Form, function, and meaning. JASO, 26, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Jordà, S. (2005). Instruments and players: Some thoughts on digital lutherie. Journal of New Music Research., 33, 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, D. (1990). Track organology. In October 55, Reprinted in S. Penny, (ed.) Critical issues in electronic media (pp. 205–218). Albany: SUNY Press, 1995. 
   Google Scholar
• Kartomi, M. J. (1990). On concepts and classifications of musical instruments. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., & Seifert, U. (2017). Interactivity of digital musical instruments: Implications of classifying musical instruments on basic music research. In T. Bovermann, A. de Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical instruments in the 21st century: Identities, configurations, practices (pp. 9–24). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, J. (1959). Ethnomusicology. The Hague: Martinus.10.1007/978-94-011-9068-8
   Google Scholar
• Kvifte, T. (2005). Instruments and the electronic age (2nd ed). Oslo: Solum Forlag. (first published in 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Kvifte, T., & Jensenius, A. R. (2006). Towards a coherent terminology and model of instrument description and design. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Laban, R. (1975). Laban’s principles of dance and movement notation. London: MacDonald and Evans. (First published 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation—Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3, 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, D. J., McAdams, S., & Adams, R. L. (2002). Control parameters for musical instruments: A foundation for new mappings of gesture to sound. Organised Sound, 7, 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lysloff, R. T. A., & Matson, J. (1985). A new approach to the classification of sound-producing instruments. Ethnomusicology, 29, 213–236.10.2307/852139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, T. (2009). Of epistemic tools: Musical instruments as cognitive extensions. Organised Sound., 14, 168–176.10.1017/S1355771809000272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, T. (2010). An epistemic dimension space for musical devices. In Proceedings of the NIME Conference (pp. 43–46). Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, T., & Hurtado, E. (2007). The acoustic, the digital and the body: A survey on musical instruments. Proceedings of the NIME Conference. New York, NY: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Mahillon, V.-C. (1880). Musée instrumental du Conservatoire Royale de Musique. Catalogue descriptif & analytique de Musée instrumental du Conservatorie royal de musique de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S. (2007). Natural interfaces for musical expression: Physiphones and a physics-based organology. Proceedings of the NIME Conference. New York, NY: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. (1945). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 89–93.10.1007/BF02478457
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, A., Berdahl, E., Lyons, M. J., Jensenius, A. R., Bukvic, I. I., & Knudsen, A. (2016). NIMEhub: Toward a repository for sharing and archiving instrument designs. Proceedings of the conference for new interfaces for musical expression. Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Nettl, B. (2005). The study of ethnomusicology: Thirty-one issues and concepts. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (2004). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to the philosophy of the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D. (1980). Note on a ‘Corpophone’. Newsletter of the Society for Ethnomusicology, 4, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Paine, G. (2010). Towards a taxonomy of realtime interfaces for electronic music performance. Proceedings of new interfaces for musical expression. Sidney: University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog days: The invention and impact of the moog synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puig, V. (2014). Digital studies: Issues of organology for individuation in collaborative practices. Heritage in the age of digital humanities. Vienna: Editions LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, R. (2000). How does music mean? Embodied memories and the politics of affect in the Indian Sarangi. American Ethnologist., 27, 805–838.10.1525/ae.2000.27.4.805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restle, C. (2008). Organology: The study of musical instruments in the 17th century. In J. Lazardzig, L. Schwarte, & H. Schramm (Eds.), Theatrum Scientiarum—English edition, Volume 2, instruments in art and science: On the architectonics of cultural boundaries in the 17th Century (pp. 257–268). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, C. (2006). The history of musical instruments, translation of the 1940 book. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. (2016). On the mode of existence of technical objects. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, L. (1992). Performing with active instruments. Computer Music Journal, 16, 5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Meridian. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2010). For a new critique of political economy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, J., & Dolan, E. I. (2013). Toward a new organology: Instruments of music and science. Osiris., 28, 278–298.10.1086/671381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisser, S., & Quanten, M. (2011). Rethinking musical instrument classification: Towards a modular approach to the Hornbostel–Sachs system. Yearbook for traditional music., 43, 122–146.10.5921/yeartradmusi.43.0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. (1668). An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language. London: S. Gellibrand.
   Google Scholar
• Zénouda, H. (2012). New musical organology: The audio-games, the question of ‘a-musicological’ interfaces. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on multimedia & network information systems, Wrocław, Poland.
   Google Scholar