Where does Haydn end and Mozart begin? Composer classification of string quartets

References

• Agresti, A. (2003). Categorical data analysis (Vol. 482). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 4, 40–79. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054
   Google Scholar
• Backer, E., & van Kranenburg, P. (2005). On musical stylometry – a pattern recognition approach. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2004.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowiecki, K. J. (2017). How are you, my dearest Mozart? Well-being and creativity of three famous composers based on their letters. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briot, J. P., Hadjeres, G., & Pachet, F. D. (2020). Deep learning techniques for music generation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corrêa, D. C., & Rodrigues, F. A. (2016). A survey on symbolic data-based music genre classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 60, 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon, P. J. P., & Inesta, J. M. (2007). Pattern recognition approach for music style identification using shallow statistical descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 37(2), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2006.876045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, J. S. (2003). Music information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 295–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebcioğlu, K. (1988). An expert system for harmonizing four-part chorales. Computer Music Journal, 12(3), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3680335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The elements of statistical learning (10 Vol. 1). New York: Springer Series in Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M. G., & Su, Y. S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(4), 1360–1383. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, & Su, Yu-Sung. (2016). arm: Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. R package version 1.10-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1157–1182. , March.https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/944919.944968.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjeres, G., Pachet, F., & Nielsen, F. (2017). DeepBach: A steerable model for Bach chorales generation. In Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning (Vol. 70, pp. 1362–1371). Machine Learning Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harutunian, J. M. (2005). Haydn's and Mozart's sonata styles: A comparison (Vol. 113). Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herlands, W., Der, R., Greenberg, Y., & Levin, S. A. (2014). A machine learning approach to musically meaningful homogeneous style classification. In AAAI (pp. 276–282). AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillewaere, R., Manderick, B., & Conklin, D. (2010). String quartet classification with monophonic models. In ISMIR (pp. 537–542). International Society for Music Information Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Hontanilla, M., Pérez-Sancho, C., & Inesta, J. M. (2013). Modeling musical style with language models for composer recognition. In Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis (pp. 740–748). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1980). Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 9(10), 1043–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguelet, P., & Perroud, N. (2005). Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's psychopathology in light of the current conceptualization of psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 68(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huron, D. (2002). Music information processing using the Humdrum toolkit: Concepts, examples, and lessons. Computer Music Journal, 26(2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602760137158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesser, B. (1991). Interaktive Melodieanalyse. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, B., & Poli, R. (1998). Gp-music: An interactive genetic programming system for music generation with automated fitness raters. University of Birmingham, Cognitive Science Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M. A., Epitropakis, M. G., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2011). Weighted Markov Chain model for musical composer identification. In European conference on the applications of evolutionary computation (pp. 334–343). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. S. (2018). Emergence of the second violin in the classical string quartets of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven [Doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Klauk, S., & Kleinertz, R. (2016). Mozart's italianate response to Haydn's opus 33. Music and Letters, 97(4), 575–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcw102
   Google Scholar
• Klorman, E. (2016). Mozart's music of friends: Social interplay in the chamber works. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosugi, N., Nishihara, Y., Sakata, T., Yamamuro, M., & Kushima, K. (2000). A practical query-by-humming system for a large music database. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 333–342). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. (2008). Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. P., & Feder, G. (1997). The new grove Haydn. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, C., Grivolla, J., & Herrera, P. (2008). Multimodal music mood classification using audio and lyrics. In 2008 seventh international conference on machine learning and applications (pp. 688–693). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, D. J., & Rogers, S. E. (2005). Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirka, D. (2009). Metric manipulations in Haydn and Mozart: Chamber music for strings, 1787–1791. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019). Interpretable machine learning: Definitions, methods, and applications. Preprint, arXiv:1901.04592.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder, J. A., & Baker, R. J. (2004). Generalized linear models. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, B. S. (2006). Structural analysis and segmentation of music signals. Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Pollastri, E., & Simoncelli, G. (2001). Classification of melodies by composer with hidden Markov models. In Proceedings first international conference on WEB delivering of music. WEDELMUSIC 2001 (pp. 88–95). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Polson, N. G., Scott, J. G., Clarke, B., & Severinski, C. (2012). Shrink globally, act locally: Sparse Bayesian regularization and prediction. In Bayesian statistics (Vol. 9). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, C. (1997). The classical style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven (Vol. 653). WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schedl, M., Gómez, E., & Urbano, J. (2014). Music information retrieval: Recent developments and applications. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 8(2–3), 127–261. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, E. G., Krysciak, A. M., & Campbell, R. J. (2000). Perceiving emotion in melody: Interactive effects of pitch and rhythm. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selfridge-Field, E. (1997). Beyond MIDI: The handbook of musical codes. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Taminau, J., Hillewaere, R., Meganck, S., Conklin, D., Nowé, A., & Manderick, B. (2010). Applying subgroup discovery for the analysis of string quartet movements. In Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on machine learning and music (pp. 29–32). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley, D., & Marvin, E. W. (2008). Pitch-class distribution and the identification of key. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2008.25.3.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley, D., & Tan, D. (2013). Emotional connotations of diatonic modes. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.3.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzanetakis, G., & Cook, P. (2002). Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSA.89 doi: 10.1109/TSA.2002.800560
   Google Scholar
• Van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., & Schrauwen, B. (2013). Deep content-based music recommendation. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2643–2651). Curran Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van Kranenburg, P., & Backer, E. (2005). Musical style recognition – a quantitative approach. In Handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision (pp. 583–600). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Velarde, G., Cancino Chacón, C., Meredith, D., Weyde, T., & Grachten, M. (2018). Convolution-based classification of audio and symbolic representations of music. Journal of New Music Research, 47(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2018.1458885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde, G., Weyde, T., Chacón, C. E. C., Meredith, D., & Grachten, M. (2016). Composer recognition based on 2D-filtered piano-rolls. In ISMIR (pp. 115–121). International Society for Music Information Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, P. G., & Troost, J. M. (1989). Ascending and descending melodic intervals: Statistical findings and their perceptual relevance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L. (1866). The letters of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (Vols. 1 and 2, Translated by Lady Wallace from the collection of Ludwig Nohl). Hurd and Houghton.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, B., & Kumbier, K. (2020). Veridical data science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(8), 3920–3929. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901326117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslaw, N. (1990). The compleat Mozart: A guide to the musical works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. L., Lin, M. T., Liu, J. S., & Chen, R. (2007). Lookahead and piloting strategies for variable selection. Statistica Sinica, 17(3), 985–1003. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24307709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Q., Xie, S., Lin, Z., Wu, M., & Ju, Y. (2016). Finding the best classification threshold in imbalanced classification. Big Data Research, 5, 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar