A Math Intervention for Third Grade Latino English Language Learners at Risk for Math Disabilities

REFERENCES

• Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Plummer, J. (1997). Final report of language background as a variable in NAEP mathematics performance. Retrieved from the University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing website http://cunningham.acer.edu.au/inted/onlinedocs/1999/112897.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adams, G. & Carnine, D. (2003). Direct instruction. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 403&416). New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51&73. doi: 10.1086/499715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalova, J. & McHugh, M. (2010). Top languages spoken by English language learners nationally and by state. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. C., Delclos, J. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479&496). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. Y. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407&432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 173&195). New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., Jones, R. S., & Steinberg, E. (1985). Breakdowns in the flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9, 297&315. doi: 10.1016/0160-2896(85)90017-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. S. & K. H. Weidl. (1992). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences 4, 153&166. doi: 10.1016/1041-6080(92)90011-3.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39&64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2012). The intersection of cognitive and sociocultural factors in the development of reading comprehension among immigrant students. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1973&1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst-Slavit, G. & Slavit, D. (2007). Educational reform, mathematics, & diverse learners: Meeting the needs of all students. Multicultural Education, 14(4), 20&27.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R. (1979a). The learning potential assessment device. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R. (1979b). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Espy, K. A., Francis, P. J., Davidson, K. C., Rourke, B. P., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1989). Comparison of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 334&338. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S. J., & Hamlett, C. L. (2004). Expanding schemas-based transfer instruction to help third graders solve real-life mathematical problems. American Education Research Journal, 41, 419&445. doi: 10.3102/00028312041002419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J. M., Hamlett, C. L., & Lamber, W. E. (2008). Problem-solving and computational skills: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 30&47. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569&583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202&1242. doi: 10.3102/0034654309334431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 111&132. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 75&111. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.124.1.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. & Jitendra, A. K. (2008). Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 187&201. doi: 10.3200/JOER.102.3.187-202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.). (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165&179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., DiPipi, C. M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem solving instruction for middles school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 22&38. doi: 10.1177/00224669020360010301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C., Deatline-Buchman, A., & Sczesniak, E. (2007). Mathematical word problem solving in third-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 283&302. doi: 10.3200/JOER.100.5.283-302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., McGoey, K., Gardill, M. C., Bhat, P., & Riley, T. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. Journal of Education Research, 91, 345&355. doi: 10.1080/00220679809597564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A., & Xin, Y. P. (1997). Mathematical word-problem-instruction for students with mild disabilities and students at risk for math failure: A research synthesis. Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 412&438. doi: 10.1177/002246699703000404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kempert, S., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2011). Cognitive benefits and costs of bilingualism in elementary school students: The case of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 547&561. doi: 10.1037/a0023619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M. & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen, E. H. & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97&114. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240020501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D., Rodden, L., & Woods, A. (2009). California Department of Education. Technical Report for the California English Language Development Test (CELDT). Monterrey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2005). Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation's report card: Trial urban school district assessment mathematics 2009. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from the U.S. Department of Education website http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orosco, M. J. (2014). A word problem strategy for Latino English language learners at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 45&53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosco, M. J. (2013). The development of a math comprehension strategy in Spanish for Latino English language learners at risk for math disabilities. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 1(2), 86&108.
   Google Scholar
• Orosco, M. J., Swanson, H. L., O'Connor, R. E., & Lussier, C. (2013). The effects of dynamic strategic math on English language learners' word problem solving. Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 96&107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117&175. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231&244). New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Smith, M. L., & Vojir, C. P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 309&331. doi: 10.3102/00028312020003309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1995a). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1995b). Using the Cognitive Processing Test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic assessment measure. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 672&693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. M. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321&363. doi: 10.3102/00346543071002321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 246&254. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00079.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 207&225. doi: 10.1177/002246699903200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, Y. P., Jitendra, A. K., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 39, 181&192. doi: 10.1177/00224669050390030501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar