An Examination of the Relationship between Computation, Problem Solving, and Reading

References

• Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, S. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (2007). Item-level effects of the read-aloud accommodation for students with reading disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(15), 15–28. doi:10.1177/15345084070330010301
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, S. E., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2006). Comparing DIF across math and reading/language arts tests for students receiving a read-aloud accommodation. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(4), 329–355. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1904_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., Johnson-Gros, K. N., & Hintze, J. M. (2005). An examination of alternate assessment durations when assessing multiple-skill computational fluency: The generalizability and dependability of curriculum-based outcomes within the context of educational decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 615–622. doi:10.1002/pits.20107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., Scullin, S., Tolbize, A., & Jiban, C. L. (2008). Implications of recent research: Curriculum based measurement of math computation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 198–205. doi:10.1177/1534508407313480
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., & Vining, O. (2006). Curriculum based measurement procedures to develop multiple-skill mathematics computation probes: Evaluation of random and stratified stimulus-set arrangements. School Psychology Review, 35, 387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D. C., Altman, J. R., Shyyan, V., & Thurlow, M. L. (2010). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2007–2008 (Technical Report 56). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M. (2005). Predicting math outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 308–312. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A literature review. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 121–139. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2002). Using a concept-grounded, curriculum-based measure in mathematics to predict statewide test scores for middle school students with LD. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 102–112. doi:10.1177/00224669020360020501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34(4), 507–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Standard Reading Assessment Passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L., Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making. Scarborough, ON: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Jiban, C. L., & Deno, S. L. (2007). Using math and reading curriculum-based measurements to predict state mathematics test performance: Are simple on-minute measures technically adequate? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(2), 78–89. doi:10.1177/15345084070320020501
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Shapiro, E. S., & Hintze, J. M. (2008). Long term diagnostic accuracy of curriculum-based measures in reading and mathematics. School Psychology Review, 37, 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locuniak, M. N., & Jordan, N. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451–459. doi:10.1177/0022219408321126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Department of Education. (2010). MCA-II Test Specifications for Grade 11 Mathematics. Retrieved from http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Accountability_Programs/Assessment_and_Testing/Assessments/MCA/TestSpecs/index.html
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The Nation’s report card: Mathematics 2007 (NCES 2007–494). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The Nation’s report card: Mathematics 2009 (NCES 2010–451). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The Nation’s report card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-458). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practice. (2010). K–12 common core state standards (mathematics). Washington, DC: National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, J. G., Santoro, L. E., & Hintze, J. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(1), 19. doi:10.1177/0734282905285237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2004). Administering and scoring of reading curriculum based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcomes measurement. Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
   Google Scholar
• Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 498–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar