Effects of response options on the mathematics performance of secondary students with emotional or behavioral disorders

References

• Adamson, R. M., & Lewis, T. J. (2017). A comparison of three opportunity to respond on the academic engaged time among high school students who present challenging behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 41–51. doi:10.1177/0198742916688644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Gilford.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, G., Scheuermann, B., & Webber, J. (2009). A comparison of three instructional methods for teaching math skills to secondary students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 4–18. doi:10.1177/019874290903500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, E. (2010). Effects of student response systems on participation and learning of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 214–228. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43153820 doi:10.1177/019874291003500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, F. J., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). The effect of teacher enthusiasm on the learning and behavior of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Christle, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147–165. doi:10.1023/A:1025577410113
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conoley, J. W. (2005). Impacts of an audience response system on student achievement in high school agriscience courses (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3195100)
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. (2004). BERS-2: Behavioral and emotional rating scale [Rating scales and examiner manual] (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.proedinc.com/customer/productView.aspx?ID=3430
   Google Scholar
• Ferkis, M. A., Belfiore, P. J., & Skinner, C. H. (1997). The effects of response repetitions on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 307–324. doi:10.1023/A:1022875506110
   Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., & Morrison, C. (2010). Putting algebra progress monitoring into practice: Insights from the field. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 95–103. doi:10.1177/1053451210375302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, C. L. (2010). Effects of response cards on the performance and participation of middle school students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 200–213. doi:10.1177/019874291003500302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, G. T. (2006). Effects of student response system use on student learning and verbal participation for a sixth-grade mathematics unit (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3251405)
   Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40. doi:10.1177/1063426609333448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., Marsicano, R., & Scott, T. M. (2013). A comparison of choral and individual responding: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57, 181–188. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2012.682184
   Google Scholar
• Heward, W. L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavioral analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Hott, B. L., & Walker, J. D. (2012). Five tips to increase student participation in the secondary classroom. Learning Disabilities Forum. Retrieved from http://www.cldinternational.org/Publications/LdForum.asp
   Google Scholar
• Jolivette, K. J., Wehby, J. H., Canale, J., & Massey, N. G. (2001). Effects of choice-making opportunities on the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 131–145. doi:10.1177/019874290102600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A., Forness, S. R., & Mostert, M. P. (2005). Defining emotional or behavioural disorders: The quest for affirmation. In P. Clough, P. Garner, J. T. Pardeck, & F. Yuen (Eds.), Handbook of Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties (pp. 45–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., … Dunlop Velez, E. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics website https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kromrey, J. D., & La Rocca, M. A. (1995). Power and Type 1 error rates of new pairwise multiple comparison procedures under heterogeneous variances. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 343–362. doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W. L., & Lo, Y. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavioral Supports, 8, 88–99. doi:10.1177/10983007060080020701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively, B. R. (2010). A study of the impact of the Classroom Performance System (CPS) on fourth and fifth grade student social studies academic performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3409895)
   Google Scholar
• MacSuga-Gage, A. S., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 211–239. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Mallette, B., & Harper, G. F. (2002). A collaborative research project to improve the academic performance of a diverse sixth grade science class. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 55–70. doi:10.1177/088840640202500107
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1989). Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 83–111. doi:10.1007/BF01326638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., Council for Exceptional Children, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2002a). Pacemaker algebra. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2002b). Pacemaker prealgebra. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, J. J. (2007). Meta-analysis on the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 9, 113–128. doi:10.1177/10983007070090020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K. S., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Promoting expressive writing among students with emotional and behavioral disturbance via dialogue journals. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 33–50. doi:10.1177/019874290503100107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K. S., & Michaud, K. M. (2011). Best practices to support student behavior. Beyond Behavior, 20, 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E. (2012). Differential facilitation of learning outcomes: What does it tell us about learning disabilities and instructional programming? The International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 1(1), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M., & Yunker, B. D. (1991). A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 56–65. doi:10.1177/019874299101700107
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, V. G., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2003). Content area learning in middle school social studies classrooms and students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A comparison of strategies. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 77–93. doi:10.1177/019874290302800208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STC Middle School. (2012, March 6). PBIS video on classroom disruption [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP2_hBZXKHg
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248. doi:10.1177/10634266030110040501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121. doi:10.1177/074193250102200205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1/2), 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, T., Cooper, J. T., & Lingo, A. S. (2015). Providing student opportunities to respond in reading and mathematics: A look across grade levels. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59, 14–21. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar