References
- Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 Years beyond DISTAR. 319 Nickerson Street, Suite 112, Seattle, WA 98109: Educational Achievement Systems.
- Apter, B., Arnold, C., & Swinson, J. (2010). A mass observation study of student and teacher behaviour in British primary classrooms. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26, 151–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02667361003768518
- Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
- Becker, W. C., & Gersten, R. (1982). A follow-up of follow through: The later effects of the direct instruction model on children in fifth and sixth grades. American Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 75–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019001075
- Berliner, D. C. (1990). What’s all the fuss about instructional time. In M. Ben-Peretz, & R. Bromme (Ed.), The nature of time in schools: Theoretical concepts, practitioner perceptions. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Davis, L. L., & O’Neill, R. E. (2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 219–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-219
- Engelmann, S., Becker, W. C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow through model: Design and outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 303–317.
- Engelmann, S., & Colvin, G. (2006). Rubric for identifying authentic direct instruction programs. Eugene, OR: Engelmann Foundation.
- Ferkis, M. A., Belfiore, P. J., & Skinner, C. H. (1997). The effects of response repetitions on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 307–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022875506110
- Forness, S. R., Freeman, S. F. N., Paparella, T., Kaufman, J. M., & Walker, H. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624
- Gable, R. A., Hester, P. H., Rock, M. L., & Hughes, K. G. (2009). Back to basics: Rules, praise, ignoring and reprimands revisited. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 195–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208328831
- Gast, D. L. (2010). Single subject research in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Gersten, R. M., Becker, W. C., & Heiry, T. J. (1984). Entry IQ and yearly academic growth of children in direct instruction programs: A longitudinal study of low SES children. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 109–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737006002109
- Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives in research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
- Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609333448
- Haydon, T., & Hunter, W. (2011). The effects of two types of teacher questioning on teacher behavior and student performance: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 229–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0010
- Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., & Van Loan, C. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 267–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0052
- Hirn, R. M., & Scott, T. M. (2014). Descriptive analysis of teacher instructional practices and student engagement among adolescents with and without challenging behavior. Education & Treatment of Children, 37(4), 589–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0037
- Hook, P., Macaruso, P., & Jones, S. (2001). Efficacy of fast for word training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties; A longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0006-1
- Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 229–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0014-9
- Lambert, M. C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W. L., & Lo, Y. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 8, 88–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080020701
- Lane, K. L., Carter, E. W., Pierson, M. R., & Glaeser, B. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 108–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140020101
- Lewis, T., Hudson, S., Richter, M., & Johnson, N. (2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 247–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290402900306
- Litcher, J. H., & Roberge, L. P. (1979). First grade intervention for reading achievement of high risk children. Bulletin of the Orton Society., 24, 238–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653745
- Lyon, G. R., & Liuzzo, J. (2003). A multi-sensory reading methodology: Teaching training manual. Birmingham, MI: The Institute for Multi-Sensory Education.
- MacSuga-Gage, A. S., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 211–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0009
- Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
- Matheson, A., & Shriver, M. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.
- McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., Watson, T. S., & Hindman, P. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary school student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23–32.
- National Reading Panel. (2002). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Retrieved from: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm.
- No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. 6301 (2002).
- Oakland, T., Black, J. L., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N. L., & Blaise, R. R. (1998). An evaluation of the Dyslexia training program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 140–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100204
- Pianta, R. C., Stuhlman, M. W., & Hamre, B. K. (2002). How schools can do it better: Fostering stronger connections between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 93, 91–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.23320029307
- Rosenshine, B. V. (1987). Explicit teaching and teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 34–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800308
- Scott, T. M., Alter, P. J., & Hirn, R. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 619–642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0039
- Shaw, D. M., & Sundberg, M. L. (2008). How a neurologically integrated approach which teaches sound-symbol correspondence and legible letter formations impacts at-risk first graders. Journal Of At-Risk Issues, 14(1), 13–21.
- Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007
- Siperstein, G. N., Wiley, A. L., & Forness, S. R. (2011). School context and the academic and behavioral progress of students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 36(3), 172–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003600303
- Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2013). Digest of Education Statistics 2012 (NCES 2014-015). Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
- Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Whittaker, T. A., Richter, M., Johnson, N. W., & Trussell, R. P. (2009). Assessing teacher use of opportunities to respond and effective classroom management strategies: Comparisons among high- and low-risk elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 68–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708326597
- Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266030110040501
- Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660000800101
- Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Yoder, P. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 5–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660201000102
- Tapp, J., & Wehby, J. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203616
- U.S. Department of Education. 2014. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. 36th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2014. Washington, D.C.
- Vaughn, S., Gersten, R. L., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Finding from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006700107
- Westling, D. L. (2010). Teachers and challenging behavior knowledge, views, and practices. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 48–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327466