References
- Aspiranti, K. B., Henze, E. E. C., & Reynolds, J. L. (2020). Comparing paper and tablet modalities of math assessment for multiplication and addition. School Psychology Review, 49(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1844548
- Bay-Williams, J. M., & SanGiovanni, J. J. (2021). Figuring out fluency in mathematics teaching and learning: Moving beyond basic facts and memorization. Grades K-8. Corwin.
- Bay-Williams, J., & Stokes-Levine, A. (2017). The role of concepts and procedures in developing fluency. In D. Spangler & J. Wanko (Eds.), Enhancing professional practice with research behind principles to actions (pp. 161). NCTM.
- Berrett, A. N., & Carter, N. J. (2018). Imagine math facts improve multiplication fact fluency in third-grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9288-1
- Boaler, J., Williams, C., & Confer, A. (2015). Fluency without fear: Research evidence on the best ways to learn math facts. Youcubed. https://www.youcubed.org/fluency-without-fear/
- Boaler, J. (2014). Research suggests that timed tests cause math anxiety. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(8), 469–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.20.8.0469
- Burns, M. K. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single-digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 237–249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899847
- Codding, R. S., Volpe, R. J. M., Krebs, G., & Krebs, G. (2019). Enhancing mathematics fluency: Comparing the spacing of practice sessions with the number of opportunities to respond. School Psychology Review, 48(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0010.V48-1
- Cozad, L. E., & Riccomini, P. J. (2016). Effects of digital-based math fluency interventions on learners with math difficulties: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 5(2), 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1127743.pdf
- Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Schatschneider, C., Hamlett, C. L., DeSelms, J., Seethaler, P. M., Wilson, J., Craddock, C. F., Bryant, J. D., Luther, K., & Changas, P. (2013). Effects of first-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030127
- Fuchs, L. S., Newman-Gonchar, R., Schumacher, R., Dougherty, B., Bucka, N., Karp, K. S., Woodward, J., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., Jayanthi, M., Keating, B., & Morgan, S. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Interventions in the elementary grades (WWC 2021006). National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/WWC2021006-Math-PG.pdf
- Gersten, R. M., Chard, D. J., Jayantho, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). A meta-analysis of mathematics instructional interventions for students with learning disabilities: A technical report. Instructional Research Group.
- Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. T., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Effective math instruction: Developing automaticity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 19(3), 30–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/004005998701900309
- Hedge, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3(3), 224–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1052
- Hensley, K., Rankin, A., & Hosp, J. (2017). Comparing student performance on paper-and computer-based math curriculum measures. Assistive Technology, 29(3), 140–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1212129
- Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Chard, D. J., & Fien, H. (2008). Making connections in mathematics: Conceptual mathematics intervention for low-performing students. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309711
- Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S., & Phillips, E. (1996). Prime Time: Factors and multiples. Connected Mathematics Project (pp. 17–25). Sale Seymour Publications.
- Lappan, G., Phillips, E. D., Fey, J. T., & Friel, S. N. (2014). Connected mathematics project (3rd ed.). Savvas Learning Company.
- Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Lin, F.-L., Wang, T.-Y., & Yang, K.-L. (2018). Description and evaluation of a large-scale project to facilitate student engagement in learning mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58(September), 178–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.03.001
- McCallum, E., & Schmitt, A. J. (2011). The taped problems intervention: Increasing math fact fluency of a student with an intellectual disability. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 276–284.
- McVancel, S. M., Missall, K. N., & Bruhn, A. L. (2018). Examining incremental rehearsal: Multiplication fluency with fifth-grade students with math IEP goals. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0178-x
- Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259201300303
- Morano, S., Randolph, K., Markelz, A. M., & Church, N. (2020). Combining explicit strategy instruction and mastery practice to build arithmetic fact fluency. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920906455
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Lommatsch, C. W., Litster, K., Ashby, J., Bullock, E. K., Roxburgh, A. L., Shumway, J. F., Speed, E., Covington, B., Hartmann, C., Clarke-Midura, J., Skaria, J., Westenskow, A., MacDonald, B., Symanzik, J., & Jordan, K. (2019). How design features in digital math games support learning and mathematics connections. Computers in Human Behavior, 91(February), 316–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.036
- Namkung, J., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance among school-aged students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494
- National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2016). Principles for designing intervention in mathematics. Office of Special Education, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from, http://www.intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/Princip_Effect_Math_508.pdf
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Procedural fluency in mathematics: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/Position_Statements/Procedural%20Fluency.pdf
- Oldfield, B. J. (1991). Games in the learning of mathematics. Mathematics in School, 20(1), 41–43.
- Powell, S. R., Doabler, C. T., Akinola, O. A., Therrien, W. J., Maddox, S. A., & Hess, K. E. (2020). A synthesis of elementary mathematics interventions: Comparisons of students with mathematics difficulty with and without comorbid reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 244–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419881646
- Pustejovsky, J. E., Chen, M., & Hamilton, B. (2021). scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.5.2) Web application. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
- Riccomini, P. J., Stocker, J. D., & Morano, S. (2017). Implementing an effective mathematics fluency practice activity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(5), 318–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685053
- Shurr, J., Jimenez, B., & Bouck, E. C. (2019). In E. C. Bouck. (Eds.), Research-based practices and instructional information for students with autism and intellectual disability. Council for Exceptional Children.
- Skarr, A., Zielinski, K., Ruwe, K., Sharp, H., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2014). The effects of direct instruction flashcard and math racetrack procedures on mastery of basic multiplication facts by three elementary school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0007
- Stegemann, K. C., & Grünke, M. (2014). Revisiting an old methodology for teaching counting, computation, and place value: The effectiveness of the finger calculation method for at-risk children. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(2), 191–213. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1047461.pdf
- Steinig, R. M. (2016). Stop ruining math! Reasons and remedies for the maladies of mathematics education. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 6(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201602.10
- Stocker, Jr., J. D., & Kubina, Jr., R. M. (2017). Impact of cover, copy, and compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1196643
- Stocker, J. D., Hughes, E. M., Wiesner, A., Woika, S. Parker, M., Cozad, and Morris, J. (2021). Investigating the effects of a fact family fluency intervention on math facts fluency and quantitative reasoning. Journal of Behavioral Education. [ Advanced Online Publication]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09422-1
- Tokac, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of game-based learning on students’ mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12347
- Valentine, J. C., Tanner-Smith, E. E., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Lau, T. S. (2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer and tutorial using the scdhlm web application. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2016.1
- Vandercruysse, S., Vrugte, J. T., Jong, T. D., Wouters, P., Oostendorp, H. V., Verschaffel, L., Moeyaert, M., & Elen, J. (2016). The effectiveness of a math game: The impact of integrating conceptual clarification as support. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.004
- Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculator for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. www.singlecaseresearch.org
- White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Merrill.
- Xin, Y. P., Tzur, R., Hord, C., Liu, J., Park, J. Y., & Si, L. (2017). An intelligent tutor-assisted mathematics intervention program for students with learning difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716648740
- Zhang, D., Xin, Y. P., & Si, L. (2013). Transition from intuitive to advanced strategies in multiplicative reasoning for students with math difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911399098