Teacher Extratextual Talk During Shared Reading with Students with Extensive Support Needs

References

• American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2017). Definition of intellectual disability. http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition#.WdpE5ROPKYU
   Google Scholar
• Benson-Goldberg, S. (2021). Quantifying emergent literacy learning opportunities extended to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs in special education [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://doi.org/10.17615/kkts-1y45
   Google Scholar
• Blewitt, P., Rump, K. M., Shealy, S. E., & Cook, S. A. (2009). Shared book reading: When and how questions affect young children’s word learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Trela, K., & Jiminez, B. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & Courtade, G. R. (2020). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, J. J., & Clark, A. K. (2021). Characteristics of students who take Dynamic Learning Maps® alternate assessments: 2018-2019 (Technical Report 20-01). University of Kansas, Accessible Teaching, Learning and Assessment Systems (ATLAS). https://dynamiclearningmaps.org/sites/default/files/documents/publication/Characteristics_of_Students_Who_Take_DLM_AAs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, S. R., Keefe, E. B., Calhoon, A. J., Tanner, W., & Park, S. (2011). Preparing teachers to provide literacy instruction to all students: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824499
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction (4th ed., pp. 51–93). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium. (2016). 2014-2015 Technical manual: Integrated model. https://dynamiclearningmaps.org/about/research/publications
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., & Geist, L. A. (2016). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1213312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A. (2017). Comprehensive literacy instruction, interprofessional collaborative practice, and students with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (2020). Comprehensive literacy for all: Teaching students with significant disabilities to read and write. Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act. 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177
   Google Scholar
• Ezell, H. K., & Justice, L. M. (2005). Shared storybook reading: Building young children’s language and emergent literacy skills. Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J. E., Pollard-Durodola, S., Simmons, D. C., Taylor, A. B., Davis, M. J., Fogarty, M., & Simmons, L. (2014). Enhancing preschool children’s vocabulary: Effects of teacher talk before, during and after shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. E., & Test, D. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.34
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400. (2004). http://idea.ed.gov/download/statute.htm
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, M., Flowers, C., & Wakeman, S. (2013). Factors associated with access to the general curriculum for students with intellectual disability. Current Issues in Education, 16(3). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270–1328). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kurth, J. A., Born, K., & Love, H. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, S., Pence, K. L., Justice, L. M., & Bowles, R. P. (2008). Educators’ use of cognitively challenging questions in economically disadvantaged preschool classroom contexts. Early Education & Development, 19(2), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280801964119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombes-Tolis, J., & Feinn, R. (2008). Comparing teachers’ literacy-related knowledge to their state’s standards for reading. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 236–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801982258
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) Research Version 2012 [Computer software]. Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC. https://www.saltsoftware.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mims, P. J., Browder, D. M., Baker, J. N., Lee, A., & Spooner, F. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(3), 409–420. http://www.daddcec.com/etadd.html
   Google Scholar
• Mims, P. J., Hudson, M. E., & Browder, D. M. (2012). Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612446859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mims, P. (2020). Using instruction that works: Evidence-based practices. In D. M. Browder, F. Spooner, & G. R. Courtade (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 114–142). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Morningstar, M. E., Kurth, J. A., & Johnson, P. E. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516678327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, B., Clark, A. K., & Karvonen, M. (2015). First Contact: A census report on the characteristics of students eligible to take alternate assessments (Technical Report 16-01). University of Kansas, Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation. https://dynamiclearningmaps.org/sites/default/files/documents/publication/First_Contact_Census_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Institute for Literacy. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/product/346
   Google Scholar
• Pentimonti, J. M., & Justice, L. M. (2009). Teachers’ use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0348-6
   Google Scholar
• Price, L. H., Kleeck, A., & Huberty, C. J. (2009). Talk during book sharing between parents and preschool children: A comparison between storybook and expository book conditions. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. The Reading Teacher, 59(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichow, B., Lemons, C. J., Maggin, D. M., & Hill, D. R. (2019). Beginning reading interventions for children and adolescents with intellectual disability. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12(12), CD011359. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011359.pub2Copy
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowland, C. (2004). Communication Matrix. Oregon Health & Science University, Design to Learn Projects. https://communicationmatrix.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Dymond, S. K., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Gaffney, J. S., & Dymond, S. K. (2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L. (2015). A preliminary study of the literacy experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514558095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L. (2017). “Without being able to read, what’s literacy mean to them?”: Situated beliefs about literacy for students with significant disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Olson, A. J., Fisher, K. W., & Orlando, A. M. (2018). Exposure to literacy for students eligible for the alternate assessment. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 192–208. http://www.daddcec.com/uploads/2/5/2/0/2520220/etadd_53_2_june.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. J., & Erickson, K. A. (2018). Why Question answering in children with intellectual disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 76(November–December), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.09.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub, D. A., McCord, J. A., & Ryndak, D. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toews, S. G., McQueston, J., & Kurth, J. A. (2021). Evaluation of the evidence base for shared reading to support literacy skill development for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211008531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J. F., Flowers, C., Hart, L., Kerbel, A., Kleinert, H., Quenemoen, R., & Thurlow, M. (2012). Learner characteristics inventory project report (A product of the NCSC validity evaluation). University of Minnesota, National Center and State Collaborative. http://ncscpartners.org/Media/Default/PDFs/Resources/LCI-Project-Report-8-21-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J. (2016). Communication interaction in special education preschool classrooms. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 62(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387715Y.0000000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2015, April). Early childhood education intervention report: Shared book reading. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_sharedbook_041415.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vogler-Elias, D. (2013). Shared storybook reading. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 2850–2854). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_507
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, S., Karvonen, M., & Ahumada, A. (2013). Changing instruction to increase achievement for students with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304600201
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. L., & Hodge, K. A. (2018). Are we asking the right questions? An analysis of research on the effect of teachers’ questioning on children’s language during shared book reading with young children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416659124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Preschool teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children’s responses during whole-class shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar