The Role of Law in Special Education

References

• Adkins, B. L., Pepper, A. H., & Sykes, J. B. (2023). Federal preemption: A legal primer. Congressional Research Service, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45825.html
   Google Scholar
• Barber Philips, B. A., & Odegard, T. N. (2017). Evaluating the impact of dyslexia laws on the identification of specific learning disability and dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(3), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0148-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Boscardin, M. L. (2019). Preparing future leaders and administrators of special education. In D. F. Bateman & M. L. Yell (Eds.), Current trends and legal issues in special education (pp. 241–264). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071800539
   Google Scholar
• CADRE. (2022). National IDEA Dispute Resolution Data Summary, https://www.cadreworks.org/resources/cadre-materials/2020-21-dr-data-summary-national
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. F., Zirkel, P. A., & Mayes, T. A. (2019). State due process hearing systems under the IDEA: An update. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(3), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207319836660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. v. Fairfax County School Board, File No. 1: 22-Cv-01070 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2022), https://specialeducationaction.com/class-action-lawsuit-filed-against-virginia-department-of-education-and-fairfax-county-school-board-alleges-civil-rights-violation-of-students-who-have-special-needs/#prettyPhoto
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, J. C. (2010). Structure and precedent. Michigan Law Review, 108, 1453–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, A. I., Jones, N. E., & Zirkel, P. A. (2021). Frequency trends in state complaint procedures under the IDEA. West’s Education Law Reporter, 394, 440–454.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M. (1986). The day after the litigation explosion. Maryland Law Review, 46, 3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K., & Zirkel, P. A. (2018). Complaint procedure systems under the IDEA: A state-by-state survey. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 31(2), 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Heubert, J. P. (1997). The more we get together: Improving the collaboration between educators and their lawyers. Harvard Education Review, 67(3), 531–583. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.3.595072k230471549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holben, D. M., & Zirkel, P. A. (2021). Due process hearings under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Justice delayed. Rutgers Law Review, 73, 833–868.
   Google Scholar
• Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Horner, S. L., Mrachko, A., O’Connor, E. A., & Yasik, A. E. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge of special education laws. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32, 48–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kirp, D. L., Buss, W., & Kuriloff, P. (1974). Legal reform of special education: Empirical studies and procedural proposal. California Law Review, 62(1), 40–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3479822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, B. (1977). Hyperlexis: Our national disease. Northwestern University Law Review, 71, 767–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, S. R. (2013). Special education legislation and policy in Canada. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 14, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mermin, S. (1982). Law and the legal system: An introduction (2d ed.). Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Militello, M., Schimmel, D., & Eberwein, H. J. (2009). If they knew, they would change: How legal knowledge impacts principals’ practice. NASSP Bulletin, 93(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636509332691
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D., & Kirp, D. L. (1985). The allure of legalization: The case of special education reconsidered. Law & Contemporary Problems, 48(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191640
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. A., Yasik, A. E., & Horner, S. (2016). Teachers’ knowledge of special education laws: What do they know. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 13, 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Protz, B. M. (2005). Administrators’ understanding of special education law in the schoolhouse. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 18(2), 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, C. J., & Osborne, A. G. (2023). Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools: Has the Supreme Court opened or closed Pandora’s box? West’s Education Law Reporter, 412, 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmel, D., & Militello, M. (2007). Legal literacy for teachers: A neglected responsibility. Harvard Education Review, 77(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.77.3.842n787555138746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirtic, T. H. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Education Review, 61(2), 148–207. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.61.2.0q702751580h0617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, P. (1984). The place of agencies in government: Separation of powers and the fourth branch. Columbia Law Review, 84(3), 573–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, A. A., Turnbull, H. R., Erwin, E. J., Soodak, L. C., & Shogren, K. A. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnership and trust. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2006, August 14). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities and preschool grants for students with disabilities: Final rule. Federal Register, 71, 46540–46875.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009–12). Office for Civil Rights report to the President and the Secretary. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr//congress.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Office for Civil Rights annual report to the Secretary, the President, and the Congress. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/congress.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2022). Office for Civil Rights complaint processing manual. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/ocrcpm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special education reform. Harvard Education Review, 47(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.2.v870r1v16786270x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudof, M. (1981). Legalization of dispute resolution, distrust of authority, and organizational theory: Implementing due process for students in the public schools. Wisconsin Law Review, 1981, 891–923.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer, I., & Zirkel, P. A. (2014). The legal content of school psychology journals: A systematic survey. Psychology in the Schools, 51(10), 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2011). Autism litigation under the IDEA: A new meaning of “disproportionality”? Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(2), 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2013). A comprehensive evaluation of the Supreme Court’s Forest Grove decision? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912468576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2014a). The law in the special education literature: A brief legal critique. Behavioral Disorders, 39(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2014b). The legal quality of articles published in school psychology journals: An initial report card. School Psychology Review, 43(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2015). The “red flags” for child find under the IDEA: Separating the law from the lore. Exceptionality, 23(3), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2017a). The courts’ use of OCR policy interpretations in Section 504/ADA K-12 student education cases. West’s Education Law Reporter, 349, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2017b). The courts’ use of OSEP policy interpretations in IDEA cases. West’s Education Law Reporter, 344, 671–677.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2017c). The two dispute decisional processes under the Individuals with disabilities education act: An empirical comparison. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 16, 169–207.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2018). Response to intervention: Lore v. law. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717745646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2019). Professional misconceptions of the Supreme Court’s decision in Endrew F. Communiqué, 47(8), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2020a). Legal information in special education: Accuracy with transparency. Exceptionality, 28(4), 312–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2020b). An updated primer on special education law. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 52(4), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919878671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2022a). Legal requirements for progress monitoring under the IDEA: What do the courts say? Exceptionality, 30(5), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2022.2134868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2022b). The “peer-reviewed research” provision of the Individuals with disabilities education act: A current comprehensive snapshot. West’s Education Law Reporter, 397, 422–431.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Frisch, B. H. (2023). Longitudinal trends of judicial rulings in K–12 education: The latest look. West’s Education Law Reporter, 407, 409–415.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Gullo, G. L. (2020). Trends in impartial hearings under the IDEA: A comparative update. West’s Education Law Reporter, 376, 870–876.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Hetrick, A. (2017). Which procedural parts of the IEP process are most judicially vulnerable? Exceptional Children, 83(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916651849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Karanxha, Z. (in press). Longitudinal trends in special education case law: An updated analysis. Journal of Special Education Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., Karanxha, Z., & D’Angelo, A. (2007). Creeping judicialization of special education hearings: An exploratory study. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 27, 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Machin, A. (2012). The special education case law “iceberg”: An initial exploration of the underside. Journal of Law & Education, 41, 483–512.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Skidmore, C. A. (2014). National trends in the frequency and outcomes of hearing and review officer decisions under the IDEA: An empirical analysis. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 29, 525–576.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Yell, M. L. (2023). Indicators of progress in the wake of Endrew F.: The distinction between professional recommendations and judicial rulings. Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231165500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar