Data to Inform Academic Instruction for Students with Extensive Support Needs: Availability, Use, and Perceptions

References

• Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agran, M., Jackson, L., Kurth, J. A., Ryndak, D., Burnette, K., Jameson, M., Zagona, A., Fitzpatrick, H., & Wehmeyer, M. (2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, C. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Selecting and designing measurements to track the reading progress of students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220910736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. R., & Weingarten, Z. (2019). Strategies for setting high-quality academic individualized education program goals (ED599697). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599697.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B. S., Bettini, E. A., & Williams, T. O. (2017). Teacher racial/ethnic diversity: Distribution of special and general educators of color across schools. Remedial and Special Education, 40(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517733047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. K., & Karvonen, M. (2021). Instructionally embedded assessment: A theory of action for an innovative system. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 724938. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.724938
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., Kobrin, J., Karvonen, M., & Hirt, A. (2023). Teacher use of diagnostic score reports for instructional decision-making in the subsequent academic year. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 28(1), Article 6. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol28/iss1/6
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(4), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W., & Garrison, M. (2013). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data-driven decision making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond, S. K., & Orelove, F. P. (2001). What constitutes effective curricula for students with severe disabilities? Exceptionality, 9(3), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX0903_2
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., Wayman, M. M., Deno, S. L., McMaster, K. L., & de Rooij, M. (2017). Data‐based decision‐making: Developing a method for capturing teachers’ understanding of CBM graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Filderman, M. J., Toste, J. R., & Cooc, N. (2020). Does training predict second-grade teachers’ use of student data for decision-making in reading and mathematics? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(4), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508420902523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filderman, M. J., Toste, J. R., Didion, L. A., Peng, P., & Clemens, N. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918790001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummer, E. S., & Mandinach, E. B. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, A., Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). Building teachers’ data-use capacity: Insights from strong and developing coaches. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(52), 52. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n52.2014
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for “data use” among teachers and school leaders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, P.-G., McMaster, K. L., Kunkel, A. K., Shin, J., & Stecker, P. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, J. (2017). Why evaluations fail. The Learning Professional, 38(2), 26–30. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/why-evaluations-fail.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurth, J., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2010). Individual education plan goals and services for adolescents with autism: Impact of age and educational setting. The Journal of SpecialEducation, 44(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908329825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurth, J. A., Ruppar, A. L., Toews, S. G., McCabe, K. M., McQueston, J. A., & Johnston, R. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and practice for persons with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H., & Jones, P. (2018). Teachers’ pedagogical decision‐making and influences on this when teaching students with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembke, E. S., McMaster, K. L., Smith, R. A., Allen, A., Brandes, D., & Wagner, K. (2018). Professional development for data-based instruction in early writing: Tools, learning, and collaborative support. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 41(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417730112
   Google Scholar
• Lignugaris/Kraft, B., & Harris, S. (2014). Teacher preparation: Principles of effective pedagogy. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris/Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 233–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., & Adams, P. (2008). Developing standards-based individualized education program objectives for students with significant needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000303
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. G., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., Council for Exceptional Children, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2016). Perspectives of special education teachers on general education curriculum access: Preliminary results. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915604835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhter, L., & Karvonen, M. (2023). The impact of professional development on data-based decision-making for students with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 45(1), 44–57. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231164636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Gaffney, J. S., & Dymond, S. K. (2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Luyten, H., & Ebbeler, J. (2017). Factors promoting and hindering data-based decision making in schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1256901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., Wasburn-Moses, L., Thomas, R. A., & Leko, C. D. (2014). The policy and economic contexts of teacher education. In P. T. Sindelar, E. D. McCray, M. T. Brownell, & B. Lignugaris/Kraft (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 31–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siuty, M. B., Leko, M. M., & Knackstedt, K. M. (2018). Unraveling the role of curriculum in teacher decision making. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 41(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416683230
   Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., Ghere, G., Lazarus, S. S., & Liu, K. K. (2020). MTSS for all: Including students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, TIES Center. https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/NCEOBriefMTSS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake, M. T. (2014). Weighing costs and benefits: Teacher interpretation and implementation of access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914544547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education. (2017, December 7). Questions and Answers (Q&A) on U. S. Supreme Court Case Decision Endrew F. V. Douglas County School District Re-1. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/qa-endrewcase-12-07-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, S. Y., Karvonen, M., Flowers, C., & Ruhter, L. (2021). Alternate assessments and monitoring student progress in inclusive classrooms. In J. McLeskey, F. Spooner, B. Algozzine, & N. L. Waldron (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive elementary schools: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 302–321). Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Wilkerson, S. B., Cho, V., Mandinach, E. B., & Supovitz, J. A. (2016). Guide to using the Teacher Data Use Survey (REL 2017-166). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/rel/regions/appalachia/pdf/REL_2017166.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, C., & Lyon, C. (2012). Formative assessment—supporting students’ learning. R & D Connections, 19, 1–12. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RD_Connections_19.pdf
   Google Scholar