Using Concept Cartoons in Formative Assessment: Scaffolding students’ argumentation

References

• Bell , B. 2000 . “ Formative assessment and science education: A model and theorizing ” . In Improving science education , Edited by: Millar , R. , Leach , J. and Osborne , J. 48 – 61 . Buckingham, , UK : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bell , B. and Cowie , B. 2001 . The characteristics of formative assessment in science education . Science Education , 85 : 536 – 553 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black , P. and Harrison , C. 2001a . Self‐ and peer‐assessment and taking responsibility: The science students’ role in formative assessment . School Science Review , 83 (302) : 43 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and Harrison , C. 2001b . Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teacher’s role in formative assessment . School Science Review , 82 (301) : 55 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and Harrison , C. 2004 . Science inside the black box , London : nferNelson .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and William , D. 1998a . Assessment and classroom learning . Assessment in Education , 5 (1) : 7 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and William , D. 1998b . Inside the black box , London : King’s College London .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. , Harrison , C. , Lee , C. , Marshall , B. and William , D. 2002 . Working inside the black box , London : King’s College London .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. , Harrison , C. , Lee , C. , Marshall , B. and William , D. 2003 . Assessment for Learning: Putting it into practice , Maidenhead, , UK : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Chapin , S. H. , O’Connor , C. and Anderson , N. C. 2003 . Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn , Sausalito, CA : Math Solutions Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Chin , C. 2006 . Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses . International Journal of Science Education , 28 (11) : 1315 – 1346 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie , B. and Bell , B. 1999 . A model of formative assessment in science education . Assessment in Education , 6 (1) : 101 – 116 .
   Google Scholar
• Driver , R. , Newton , P. and Osborne , J. 2000 . Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms . Science Education , 84 : 287 – 312 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl , R. 2003 . “ Assessment of inquiry ” . In Everyday assessment in the science curriculum , Edited by: Atkin , J. M. and Coffey , J. E. 41 – 59 . Arlington, VA : NSTA Press .
   Google Scholar
• Duschl , R. A. and Osborne , J. 2002 . Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education . Studies in Science Education , 38 : 39 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , D. and Mercer , N. 1987 . Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom , London : Methuen .
   Google Scholar
• Engle , R. A. and Conant , F. R. 2002 . Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom . Cognition and Instruction , 20 : 399 – 484 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan , S. 1994 . Cooperative learning , San Clemente, CA : Kagan Cooperative Learning .
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. and Naylor , S. 1993 . Learning in science: Another way in . Primary Science Review , 26 : 22 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. and Naylor , S. 1997 . Starting points for science , Sandbach, , UK : Millgate House .
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. and Naylor , S. 1998 . Teaching and learning in science using concept cartoons . Primary Science Review , 51 : 14 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. and Naylor , S. 1999 . Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation . International Journal of Science Education , 21 (4) : 431 – 446 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. , Naylor , S. , de Boo , M. D. and Feasey , R. . Formative assessment using concept cartoons: Initial teacher training in the UK . Paper presented at the 2nd conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) . Kiel, Germany. August 31–September 4 ,
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. , Naylor , S. , de Boo , M. D. and Feasey , R. 2001 . “ Formative assessment using concept cartoons: Initial teacher training in the UK ” . In Research in science education—Past, present, and future , Edited by: Behrendt , H. , Dahncke , H. , Duit , R. , Graber , W. , Komorek , M. , Kross , A. and Reiska , P. 137 – 142 . Hingham, MA : Kluwer Academic .
   Google Scholar
• Keogh , B. , Naylor , S. and Downing , B. . Children’s interaction in the classroom: Argumentation in primary science . Paper presented at the 4th conference of the European Science Education Research Association conference . Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands. August 19–23 ,
   Google Scholar
• Lawson , A. E. 2003 . The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching . International Journal of Science Education , 25 (11) : 1387 – 1408 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke , J. L. 1990 . Talking science: Language, learning and values , Norwoord, NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• Mehan , H. 1979 . Learning lessons , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mercer , N. 1996 . The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom . Learning and Instruction , 6 : 359 – 379 .
   Google Scholar
• Mercer , N. , Dawes , L. , Wegerif , R. and Sams , C. 2004 . Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science . British Educational Research Journal , 30 (3) : 359 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer , N. , Wegerif , R. and Dawes , L. 1999 . Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom . British Educational Research Journal , 25 (1) : 95 – 111 .
   Google Scholar
• Naylor , S. and Keogh , B. 2000 . Concept cartoons in science education , Sandbach, , UK : Millgate House .
   Google Scholar
• Naylor , S. , Downing , B. and Keogh , B. . An empirical study of argumentation in primary science, using concept cartoons as the stimulus . Paper presented at the 3rd conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) . Thessaloniki, Greece. August 21–25 ,
   Google Scholar
• Naylor , S. , Keogh , B. and Downing , B. 2007 . Argumentation and primary science . Research in Science Education , 37 : 17 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor , S. , Keogh , B. and Goldsworthy , A. 2004 . Active assessment: Thinking, learning and assessment in science , London & Sandbach, , UK : David Fulton & Millgate House .
   Google Scholar
• Newton , P. , Driver , R. and Osborne , J. 1999 . The place of argument in the pedagogy of school science . International Journal of Science Education , 21 : 553 – 576 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott , P. and Ametller , J. 2007 . Teaching science in a meaningful way: Striking a balance between ‘opening up’ and ‘closing down’ classroom talk . School Science Review , 88 (324) : 77 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Scott , P. H. , Mortimer , E. F. and Aguiar , O. G. 2006 . The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons . Science Education , 90 : 605 – 631 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar