1,326
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

What Teachers See as Creative Incidents in Elementary Science Lessons

&
Pages 1989-2005 | Published online: 27 Oct 2009

References

  • Aljughaiman , A. and Mowrer‐Reynolds , E. 2005 . Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students . Journal of Creative Behavior , 39 (1) : 17 – 34 .
  • Amabile , T. M. 1998 . How to kill creativity . Harvard Business Review , 76 (5) : 76 – 87 .
  • Bacchetti , P. 2002 . Peer review of statistics in medical research: The other problem . British Medical Journal , 324 : 1271 – 1273 .
  • Barron , F. 1988 . “ Putting creativity to work ” . In The Nature of Creativity , Edited by: Sternberg , R. J. 76 – 98 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Bassey , M. 2001 . A solution to the problem of generalisation in educational research: Fuzzy prediction . Oxford Review of Education , 22 (1) : 5 – 22 .
  • Beghetto , R. A. 2007 . Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Perspective teachers’ response preferences . Thinking Skills and Creativity , 2 (1) : 1 – 9 .
  • Bjerstedt , A. 1976 . Explorations in creativity , Lund : LiberLaromedel/Gleerup .
  • Boden , M. A. 2004 . The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms , London : Routledge .
  • Brickhouse , N. and Bodner , G. M. 1992 . The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of conviction and constraints . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 29 (5) : 471 – 485 .
  • Cohen , J. 1988 . Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences , (2nd ed.) , Hillsdale : LEA .
  • Costello , F. and Keane , M. T. 1992 . Concept combination: A theoretical review . Irish Journal of Psychology , 13 : 125 – 140 .
  • Cropley , A. J. 2001 . Creativity in education and learning , London : Kogan Page .
  • Csikszentmihalyi , M. 1996 . Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention , New York : HarperCollins .
  • Davies , D. , Howe , A. , Rogers , M. and Fasciato , M. 2004 . “ How do trainee primary teachers understand creativity? ” . In Creativity and innovation—DATA international research conference , Edited by: Norman , E. , Spendlove , D. , Graver , P. and Mitchell , A. 1 – 6 . Wellesbourne : DATA .
  • DES (Department for Education and Skills) . 2005 . Education and training statistics for the United Kingdom , London : Stationery Office .
  • DES (Department for Education and Skills) . 2006 . First release , London : DES .
  • DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) . 1999 . The national curriculum for England: Science , London : DfEE .
  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills) . 2003 . Excellence and enjoyment , London : DfES .
  • Diakidoy , I.‐A. N. and Kanari , E. 1999 . Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity . British Educational Research Journal , 25 (2) : 225 – 243 .
  • Dickinson , V. L. , Abd‐El‐Khalick , F. S. and Lederman , N. G. Changing elementary teachers’ views of the NOS: Effective strategies for science method courses. ERIC No: ED 441 680 . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science . Austin, TX. April .
  • Edmonds , J. 2004 . “ Creativity in science: Leaping the void ” . In Unlocking creativity , Edited by: Fisher , R. and Williams , M. 82 – 91 . London : David Fulton .
  • Eysenck , M. W. and Keane , M. T. 2000 . Cognitive psychology , New York : Psychology Press .
  • Flanagan , J. C. 1975 . “ The definition and measurement of ingenuity ” . In Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development , Edited by: Taylor , C. W. and Barron , F. 89 – 98 . Huntington : R.E. Krieger .
  • Fleming , M. 2008 . Arts in education and creativity: A review of the literature , London : Creative Partnerships/Arts Council England .
  • Fryer , M. and Collings , J. A. 1991 . Teachers’ views about creativity . British Journal of Educational Psychology , 61 : 207 – 219 .
  • Givens , P. R. 1962 . Identifying and encouraging creative processes . Journal of Higher Education , 33 (6) : 295 – 301 .
  • Hadamard , J. 1954 . The psychology of invention in the mathematical field , New York : Dover .
  • Howell , B. 2008 . Conceptions of creativity in secondary school English . English Language Teaching , 1 (2) : 36 – 48 .
  • Jarvis , T. and Pell , A. 2004 . Primary teacher’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two‐year in‐service science programme and their effects on pupils . International Journal of Science Education , 26 : 1787 – 1811 .
  • Kennedy , M. 2005 . Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform , Cambridge : Harvard University Press .
  • Kind , P. M. and Kind , V. 2007 . Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science . Studies in Science Education , 43 : 1 – 37 .
  • Kruger , C. 1990 . Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy . Physics Education , 25 : 86 – 91 .
  • Lubart , T. I. and Mouchiroud , C. 2003 . “ Creativity: A source of difficulty in problem solving ” . In The psychology of problem solving , Edited by: Davidson , J. E. and Sternberg , R. J. 127 – 148 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • McLaren , R. B. 1999 . “ Dark side of creativity ” . In Encyclopedia of creativity , Edited by: Runco , M. A. and Pritzker , S. R. 483 – 492 . San Diego : Academic Press .
  • Metcalfe , R. J. A. 1983 . Assessment of creativity , Oxford : TRC‐Rediguides .
  • Moseley , D. , Baumfield , V. , Elliott , J. , Gregson , M. , Higgins , S. Miller , J. 2005 . Frameworks for thinking , 119 et seq Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • NACCCE (National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education) . 1999 . All our futures: Creativity, culture and education , London : DfEE .
  • NAE (National Academy of Engineering) . 2005 . Educating the engineer of 2020 , Washington, DC : National Academies Press .
  • Newton , D. P. 2000 . Teaching for understanding , London : Routledge‐Falmer .
  • Newton , D. P. and Newton , L. D. 2000 . Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? . British Educational Research Journal , 26 (5) : 599 – 613 .
  • Newton , D. P. and Newton , L. D. 2009a . A problem‐based approach to training elementary teachers to plan science lessons , New York : NOVA .
  • Newton , D. P. and Newton , L. D. 2009b . Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science . Research in Science and Technological Education , 27 (1) : 45 – 60 .
  • Newton , L. D. and Newton , D. P. Conceptions of creativity in elementary school science. Excellence in education, 2008: Future minds and creativity . Proceedings of the conference at the International Centre for Innovation in Education . Paris. July 1–4 .
  • Pink , D. H. 2005 . A whole new mind , New York : Penguin .
  • Rutherford , A. 2001 . Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM approach , London : Sage .
  • Shaw , M. P. 1989 . The eureka process . Creativity Research Journal , 2 : 286 – 98 .
  • Simonton , D. K. 1999 . Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Skamp , K. 1995 . Student teachers’ conceptions of how to recognise a “good” primary science teacher . Research in Science Education , 25 : 395 – 429 .
  • Spearman , C. 1931 . The creative mind , London : Nisbet .
  • Tatarkiewicz , W. 1980 . A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics , The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff .
  • Taylor , C. W. 1988 . “ Various approaches to and definitions of creativity ” . In The nature of creativity , Edited by: Sternberg , R. J. 99 – 121 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Taylor , C. W. , Smith , W. R. and Gheselin , B. 1975 . “ The creative and other contributions of one sample of research scientists ” . In Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development , Edited by: Taylor , C. W. and Barron , F. 53 – 76 . Huntington : R.E. Krieger .
  • Thompson , A. G. 1984 . The relationship between teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice . Educational Studies in Mathematics , 15 : 105 – 127 .
  • Torrance , E. P. 1975 . “ Explorations in creative thinking in the early school years ” . In Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development , Edited by: Taylor , C. W. and Barron , F. 173 – 183 . Huntington : R. E. Krieger .
  • Trigwell , K. , Prosser , M. and Waterhouse , F. 1999 . Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning . Higher Education , 37 : 57 – 70 .
  • Walker , C. and Gleaves , A. 2008 . An exploration of students’ perceptions and understandings of creativity as an assessment criterion in undergraduate‐level studies within higher education . Irish Educational Studies , 27 (1) : 41 – 54 .
  • Waters‐Adams , S. 2006 . The relationship between understanding the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning . International Journal of Science Education , 28 : 919 – 944 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.