Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry

References

• Anderson , C. 2007 . “ Perspectives on science learning ” . In Handbook of research in science education , Edited by: Abell , S. K. and Lederman , N. 3 – 30 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong , N. , Wallace , C. and Chang , S.-M. 2008 . Learning from writing in college biology . Research in Science Education , 38 ( 4 ) : 483 – 499 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman , C. 1988 . Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science , Madison , WI : University of Wisconsin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bell , P. and Linn , M. C. 2000 . Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE . International Journal of Science Education , 22 ( 8 ) : 797 – 818 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter , C. and Scardamalia , M. 1987 . The psychology of written composition , Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter , C. and Huckin , T. 1995 . Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan , R. and Biklen , S. 1992 . Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods , Boston , MA : Allyn and Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Brillhart , L. and Debs , M. 1981 . Teaching writing—a scientist's responsibility . Journal of College Science Teaching , 10 ( 5 ) : 303 – 304 .
   Google Scholar
• Burke , K. , Greenbowe , T. and Hand , B. 2006 . Implementing the scientific writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory . Journal of Chemical Education , 83 ( 7 ) : 1032 – 1038 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen , W. S. 2007 . “ Language and science learning ” . In Handbook of research on science education , Edited by: Abell , S. K. and Lederman , N. 57 – 74 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Carter , M. 2007 . Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines . College Composition and Communication , 58 ( 3 ) : 385 – 418 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter , M. , Ferzli , M. and Wiebe , E. 2007 . Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines . Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 21 : 278 – 302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver , R. , Asoko , H. , Leach , J. , Mortimer , E. and Scott , P. 1994 . Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom . Educational Researcher , 23 : 5 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , R. 2004 . University student approaches to learning science through writing . International Journal of Science Education , 26 ( 15 ) : 1835 – 1853 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran , S. 2008 . “ Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms ” . In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jimenez-Aleixandre , M. 47 – 69 . Dordrecht : Springer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Fallahi , C. , Wood , R. , Austad , C. and Fallahi , H. 2006 . A program for improving undergraduate psychology students’ basic writing skills . Teaching of Psychology , 33 ( 3 ) : 171 – 175 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn , E. , McCulley , G. and Gratz , R. 1986 . “ Writing in biology: Effects of peer critiquing and analysis of models on the quality of biology laboratory reports ” . In Writing across the disciplines: Research into practice , Edited by: Young , A. and Fulwiler , T. 160 – 175 . Upper Montclair , NJ : Boynton/Cook .
   Google Scholar
• Ford , M. 2008 . Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning . Science Education , 92 ( 3 ) : 404 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith , D. and Rijlaarsdam , G. 1999 . Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing . Learning and Instruction , 9 : 93 – 108 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdeman , R. , Russell , A. and Worden , K. 2007 . Web-based student writing and reviewing in a large biology lecture course . Journal of College Science Teaching , 36 ( 5 ) : 46 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Green , S. B. and Salkind , N. J. 2005 . Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data , 4 , Upper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson-Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Guilford , W. 2001 . Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing . Advances in Physiology Education , 25 : 167 – 175 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday , M. and Martin , J. 1993 . Writing science: Literacy and discursive power , London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Hand , B. and Choi , A. 2010 . Examing the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments on organic chemistry laboratory classes . Research in Science Education , 40 ( 1 ) : 29 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand , B. and Prain , V. 2006 . Moving from border crossing to convergence of perspectives in language and science literacy research and practice . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 2–3 ) : 101 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrisano , R. and Paratore , J. 2005 . Learning to write and writing to learn: Theory and research in practice , Edited by: Indrisano , R. and Paratore , J. Newark , DE : International Reading Association .
   Google Scholar
• Jerde , C. and Taper , M. 2004 . Preparing undergraduates for professional writing . Journal of College Science Teaching , 33 ( 7 ) : 34 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , G. 2007 . “ Discourse in science classrooms ” . In Handbook of research on science education , Edited by: Abell , S. K. and Lederman , N. 443 – 469 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , G. J. and Bazerman , C. 2003 . How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis . Applied Linguistics , 24 ( 1 ) : 28 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G.J., Bazermann, C., Skukauskaite, A., & Prothero, W. (2002). Rhetorical features of student scientific writing in introductory university oceanography. Paper presented at the International conference of Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , G. , Regev , J. and Prothero , W. 2008 . “ Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation ” . In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jimenez-Aleixandre , M. 137 – 157 . Dordreht : Springer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , G. J. and Takao , A. 2002 . Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing . Science Education , 86 ( 3 ) : 314 – 342 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis , J. and Koch , G. 1977 . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data . Biometrics , 33 : 159 – 174 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour , B. 1987 . Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society , Cambridge : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lawson , A. 2002 . Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 ( 3 ) : 237 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson , A. 2003 . The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching . International Journal of Science Education , 25 ( 11 ) : 1387 – 1408 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke , J. 1990 . Talking science: Language, learning, and values , Norwood , NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• McClure , C. 2009 . Introducing scientific writing to students early in their academic careers . Journal of College Science Teaching , 38 ( 6 ) : 20 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• McNeill , K. L. and Krajcik , J. 2007 . “ Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations ” . In Thinking with data: The proceedings of 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition , Edited by: Lovett , M. and Shah , P. 233 – 265 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• McNeill , K. L. , Lizotte , D. J. , Krajcik , J. and Marx , R. W. 2006 . Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials . The Journal of the Learning Sciences , 15 ( 2 ) : 153 – 191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne , J. , Erduran , S. and Simon , S. 2004 . Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 41 ( 10 ) : 994 – 1020 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poock , J. , Burke , K. , Greenbowe , T. and Hand , B. 2007 . Using the scientific writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students academic performance . Journal of Chemical Education , 84 : 1371 – 1378 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell , A. 1985 . A chemist's view of writing, reading, and thinking across the curriculum . College Composition and Communication , 36 ( 4 ) : 414 – 418 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt , H. and Pratt , N. 2004 . “ Integrating science and literacy instruction with the common goal of learning science content ” . In Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice , Edited by: Saul , W. 395 – 405 . Newark , DE : International Reading Association .
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds , J. and Vogel , S. 2007 . Precisely! A writing exercise for science and engineering classes . Journal of College Science Teaching , 36 ( 5 ) : 30 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Rijlaarsdam , G. , Couzijn , M. , Janssen , T. , Braaksma , M. and Kieft , M. 2006 . Writing experimental manuals in science education: The impact of writing genre and audience . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 2–3 ) : 203 – 234 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson , R. 2001 . An application to increase student reading and writing skills . American Biology Teacher , 63 ( 7 ) : 474 – 480 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell , A. 2004 . “ Calibrated peer reviewTM: A writing and critical-thinking instructional tool ” . In Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education , 67 – 72 . Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science .
   Google Scholar
• Sampson , V. and Clark , D. 2008 . Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions . Science Education , 92 ( 3 ) : 447 – 472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson , V. , Grooms , J. and Walker , J. 2011 . Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study . Science Education , 95 ( 2 ) : 212 – 257 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval , W. A. and Reiser , B. J. 2004 . Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry . Science Education , 88 ( 3 ) : 345 – 372 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul , E. W. 2004 . Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice , Edited by: Saul , E. W. Arlington , VA : NSTA Press .
   Google Scholar
• Scott , P. H. , Asoko , H. and Leach , J. 2007 . “ Students conceptions and conceptual learning in science ” . In Handbook of research in science education , Edited by: Abell , S. K. and Lederman , N. 31 – 56 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell , J. 1991 . The composing process of nursing students in writing nurses . Journal of Nursing Education , 30 ( 4 ) : 162 – 167 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sunderwirth , S. 1993 . Required writing in freshman chemistry courses . Journal of Chemical Education , 70 ( 6 ) : 474 – 475 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishman , S. and Perkins , D. N. 1997 . The language of thinking . Phi Delta Kappan , 78 ( 5 ) : 368 – 374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry: An introduction to a new instructional model and how it can be used in undergraduate chemistry labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1048–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace , C. , Hand , B. and Prain , V. 2004 . Writing and learning in the science classroom , Edited by: Wallace , C. , Hand , B. and Prain , V. Boston , MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Walvoord , M. , Hoefnagels , M. , Gaffin , D. , Chemchal , M. and Long , D. 2008 . An analysis of calibrated peer review (CPR) in a science lecture classroom . Journal of College Science Teaching , 37 ( 4 ) : 66 – 73 .
   Google Scholar
• Yager , R. E. 2004 . “ Science is not written, but it can be written about ” . In Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice , Edited by: Saul , W. 95 – 107 . Newark , DE : International Reading Association .
   Google Scholar
• Yore , L. 2004 . “ Why do future scientists need to study the language arts? ” . In Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice , Edited by: Saul , W. 71 – 94 . Newark , DE : International Reading Association .
   Google Scholar
• Yore , L. , Bisanz , G. and Hand , B. 2003 . Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research . International Journal of Science Education , 25 ( 6 ) : 689 – 725 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar