1,631
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Effects of Scaffolded Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning on Fifth-Graders' Representations of the Greenhouse Effect

, , &

References

  • Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241–255. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002
  • Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and why Ozone Layer depletion is a problem. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1096–1111. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1096::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-8
  • Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children's exploration of ‘big ideas’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319–341. doi: 10.1080/09500690802595771
  • Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., & Willet, J. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23–41. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000019636.06814.e3
  • Chang, K., Chen, Y., Lin, H., & Sung, Y. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.007
  • diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 843–900. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2806_1
  • Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485–497. doi: 10.1080/095006999290534
  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.
  • Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009). Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangements: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1107–1149. doi: 10.3102/0002831209340235
  • Fugelsang, J. A., Stein, C. B., Green, A. E., & Dunbar, K. N. (2004). Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: Evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expé Rimentale, 58(2), 86–95. doi: 10.1037/h0085799
  • Gauvain, M. (2001). Cultural tools, social interaction and the development of thinking. Human Development, 44, 126–143. doi: 10.1159/000057052
  • Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing, conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools. Researching reforming practice (pp. 3–34). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gobert, J., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students’ epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7–22. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000019635.70068.6f
  • Gobert, J. D., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Introduction to the issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000019705.04018.a3
  • Hansen, P. J. K. (2010). Knowledge about the greenhouse effect and the effects of the Ozone Layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993, and 2005—What now?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 397–419. doi: 10.1080/09500690802600787
  • Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Socio cultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development (0018716X), 44(2), 77–83. doi: 10.1159/000057047
  • Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, C. (2002). The changing meanings of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 5–61.
  • Jakobsson, A., Mäkitalo, Å., & Säljö, R. (2009). Conceptions of knowledge in research on students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect: Methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Science Education, 93(6), 978–995. doi: 10.1002/sce.20341
  • Kalvaitis, D., & Monhardt, R. M. (2011). The architecture of children's relationships with nature: A phenomenographic investigation seen through drawings and written narratives of elementary students. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 209–227. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.598227
  • Kärkkäinen, S., Keinonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Hurri, A., & Vesala, P. (2009). What is the greenhouse effect?: Fifth graders'ideas. The International Journal of Learning, 16(6), 415–429.
  • National Research Council. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. Committee on Science Learning: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education, Margaret A. Honey and Margaret L. Hilton, Eds. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press..
  • Österlind, K. (2005). Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 891–908. doi: 10.1080/09500690500038264
  • Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. (2009). Knowledge structure coherence in turkish students’ understanding of force. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 570–596. doi: 10.1002/tea.20290
  • Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.
  • Park, S. I., Lee, G., & Kim, M. (2009). Do students benefit equally from interactive computer simulations regardless of prior knowledge levels. Computers & Education, 52(3), 649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.014
  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
  • Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 239–252. doi: 10.1007/BF02357399
  • Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2011). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
  • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118. doi: 10.1159/000057050
  • Shepardson, D. P., Choi, S., Niyogi, D., & Charusombat, U. (2011a). Seventh grade students’ mental models of the greenhouse effect. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13504620903564549
  • Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A., & Hirsch, A. (2011b). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 323–352. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.622839
  • Sherin, B., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. (2004). Scaffolding analysis: Extending the scaffolding metaphor to learning artifacts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 387–421. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5
  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
  • Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305–335. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_3
  • Varma, K., & Linn, M. (2011). Using interactive technology to support students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 1–12.
  • Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2005). Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children's understanding of the globe as a model of the earth. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 333–351. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.004
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.