The Effects of Using Concept Mapping for Improving Advanced Level Biology Students' Lower- and Higher-Order Cognitive Skills

References

• Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. LondonEngland: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? Shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 5–16. doi: 10.1002/tl.7401
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T., & Cross, P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Arburn, T. M., & Bethel, L. M. (1999). Teaching strategies designed to assist community college science students’ critical thinking. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443663).
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, J. (2001). Constructivist theory. Retrieved from www.dmu.ac.uk~jamesa/learning/constructivism.htm
   Google Scholar
• Berenson, S. (1995). Changing assessment practices in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 182–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15759.x
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001a). Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teacher's role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82(301), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001b). Self-assessment, peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science students’ role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83(302), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003a). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003b, April). A successful intervention – Why did it work? Paper presented at AERA Symposium on Everyday Classroom Assessment. 58.039.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, L., & Strage, A. (1996). The contradiction between teachers’ instructional goals and their assessment practices in high school biology classes. Science Education, 80(2), 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1968). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1974). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Caribbean Examinations Council. (2011, June). Report on candidates’ work in the secondary education certificate examination general proficiency, Biology.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., Koballa, T. R., & Collette, A. T. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (4th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in the secondary classroom. London: Hodder Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. (2002, September). It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England. Retrieved from www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A Model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101–117. doi: 10.1080/09695949993026
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clarke, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum and the school and society. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ennever, F. (2006). More than multiple-choice. The Science Teacher, 73(7), 54–56. Retrieved from Academic Research Library database. (Document ID: 1148188171)
   Google Scholar
• Esiobu, G., & Soyibo, K. (1995). Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning modes on student's cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 971–995. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment and learning. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, S. S., & Kyle, W. C.Jr (1992). Textbook use and the Biology education desired state. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 35–49. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223. doi:10.1080/09585170500136093 doi: 10.1080/09585170500136093
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, P. (2002). Teaching, learning and assessment: Complimentary or conflicting categories for school statistics. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/1/04_ho.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of instruction on performance in chemical energetics. Caribbean Journal of Education, 24, 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. (2006). Assessment teaching and theories of learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 47–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemla, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students’ anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951–960. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660271004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 276–286. doi: 10.1080/00220670009598719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2000). Using concept maps to reveal understanding: A two-tier analysis. School Science Review, 81, 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kretchmar, J. (2008). Taxonomy of educational objectives – The cognitive domain (p. 1). Great Neck Publishing. Retrieved from Research Starters – Education database
   Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational Researcher, 21(3), 4–17. doi: 10.3102/0013189X021003004
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self assessment on achievement: The effects of self assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209–220. doi: 10.1080/0969594032000121289
   Google Scholar
• Myers, K., & MacBeath, J. (2002). Series editor's preface. In A. Harris (Ed.), School improvement: What's in it for schools? (pp. ix–x). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1994). School-wide professional community. Issues in restructuring schools (Issue Report 6), Spring, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved from www.wcer.wisc.edu/archives/completed/cors/Issues_in_Restructuring_Schools/
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1979). Applying psychology and philosophy to the improvement of laboratory teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41(8), 466–474. doi: 10.2307/4446719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937–949. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660271003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008). Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Policy Brief, November. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/publications/Policybriefs
   Google Scholar
• Parker, V., & Gerber, B. (2000). Effects of a science intervention program on middle-grade student achievement and attitudes. School Science & Mathematics, 100(5), 36–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17263.x
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's Theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2010). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Prezler, R. (2004). Cooperative concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(6), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103–1127. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10<1103::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2000). On the use of concept maps as an assessment tool in science: What we have learned so far. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1), 29–52. Retrieved from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol2no1/contents-ruizpri.html
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. (1998). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Concept-Map representation of knowledge structures: Report of year 2 Activities (CSE Technical Report 492). National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE), Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://crest96.cse.ucla.edu/reports
   Google Scholar
• Salih, M. (2010). Developing thinking skills in Malaysian science students via an analogical task. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 110–128. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/b2oroqy
   Google Scholar
• Selvaratnam, M., & Mavuso, N. (2010). Competence of science foundation students in basic intellectual skills. South African Journal of Science, 106(1), 70–75. Retrieved from http://www.sajs.co.za
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (1995). Using assessment to improve learning. Educational Leadership, 52(5), 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/byelfc9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W. (2004). Assessing primary science learning: Beyond paper and pencil assessment. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5(8), Article 8. Retrieved from www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v5issue2/sowm/sowm5.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stanger-Hall, K. F. (2012). Multiple-choice exams: An obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 294–306. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-11-0100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of the West Indies. (n.d.). UWI Statistical Review 2009–10. Retrieved from http://www.mona.uwi.edu/opair/statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L., & Beckett, D. (2011). Formative assessment and the contemporary classroom: Synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development (M. Lopez-Morillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willerman, M., & MacHarg, R. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705–711. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. E., McLaughlin, S., & Jackson, S. (1999). Learning by doing – Two classroom studies of pupils’ preferred ways of learning science. School Science Review, 81(294), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretations, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166–184. doi: 10.1002/tea.20049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. (2003). Higher order thinking skill and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, U. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: Performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 185–203. doi: 10.1080/09500690110049060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, U., & Pushkin, D. (2007). Matching higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 153–171. doi: 10.1039/b6rp90028c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar