References
- Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling, London: Continuum.
- Fang, Z. H. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. doi: 10.1002/sce.20050
- Fang, Z. H. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. doi: 10.1080/09500690500339092
- Fang, Z. H., Lamme, L. L., & Pringle, R. M. (2010). Language and literacy in inquiry-based science classrooms, Grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Fang, Z. H., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Cox, B. E. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 247–273. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_1
- Gardner, P. L. (1980). The identification of specific difficulties with logical connectives in science among secondary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(3), 223–229. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660170306
- Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers, London: Continuum.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1993b). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Ed.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, (pp. 69–85). London: Falmer Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, London: Falmer Press.
- Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention's impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887. doi: 10.1002/tea.20071
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology, (2nd ed., pp. 37–71). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
- Meyerson, M. J., Ford, M. S., Jones, W. P., & Ward, M. A. (1991). Science vocabulary knowledge of third and fifth grade students. Science Education, 75, 419–428. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750404
- Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 571–592. doi: 10.1080/09500690701744611
- O'Toole, M. (1996). Science, schools, children and books: Exploring the classroom interface between science and language. Studies in Science Education, 28, 113–143. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560086
- Pearson, J. T., & Hughes, W. J. (1988). Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 1, a literature review and classification scheme. Journal of Biological Education, 22(3), 178–182. doi: 10.1080/00219266.1988.9654979
- Santau, A. O., Maerten-Rivera, J. L., & Huggins, A. C. (2011). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Fourth-grade student achievement results from a professional development intervention. Science Education, 95, 771–793. doi: 10.1002/sce.20443
- Saul, W. (2004). In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice, Newark, DE: International Reading Association; NSTA Press.
- Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Scott, P. H. (1997). Developing science concepts in secondary classrooms: An analysis of pedagogical interactions from a Vygotskian perspective (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Leeds, UK.
- Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C.(2011). Understanding students' language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources. Science Education, 95(5), 852–876.
- Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stannard, P., & Williamson, K. (2006). Science world 8, South Yarra: Macmillan Education Australia.
- Sutton, C. R. (1992). Words, science, and learning, Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Taber, K. S., & Coll, R. K. (2002). Bonding. In J. K. GilbertO. D. JongR. JustiD. F. Treagust & J. H. V. Driel (Ed.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice, (pp. 213–234). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Veel, R. (1992). Engaging with scientific language: A functional approach to the language of school science. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 38(4), 31–35.
- Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean—scientific speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Ed.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, (pp. 161–194). London: Cassell.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Wellington, J. J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- Wells, G. (1985). Language and learning: An interactional perspective. In G. Wells & J. Nicholls (Ed.), Language and learning: An interactional perspective, (pp. 21–39). London: The Falmer Press.
- Yore, L. D. (2004). Why do future scientists need to study the language arts?. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice, (pp. 71–94). Newark, DE: International Reading Association; NSTA Press.