When Teaching Makes a Difference: Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study

References

• Adamson, B., & Walker, E. (2011). Messy collaboration: Learning from a learning study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2011), 29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25. doi: 10.1023/A:1023666618800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Van Driel, J. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464–486. doi: 10.1002/tea.10085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964. doi: 10.1002/tea.20078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Kwang, S. Y. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84(3), 352–381. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Hofstein, A., Eylon, B.-S., & Simon, S. (2008). Evidence-based professional development of science teachers in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 577–591. doi: 10.1080/09500690701854832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (2010). The pedagogy of physical science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kindt, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned (Doctoral thesis). Professional insights gained and shared by teachers of mathematics, Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 293.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions for learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707–730. doi: 10.1080/09500690010025012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding – The complex nature of PCK in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. & Van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together – Primary school science student teachers' and their mentors' joint learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1309–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87. doi: 10.1080/0305764042000332506
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2008). Learning to design for learning. The potential of learning study to enhance learning on two levels: Teacher's and student's learning. In T. Wood & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics and teaching development (pp. 153–172). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(2), 123–158. doi: 10.1039/b1rp90014e
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2003a). Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education, 87(5), 732–758. doi: 10.1002/sce.10079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2003b). The atom in the chemistry curriculum: Fundamental concept, teaching model or epistemological obstacle? Foundations of Chemistry, 5(1), 43–84. doi: 10.1023/A:1021995612705
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in Science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–38. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar