596
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Explanation-Construction in Fourth-Grade Classrooms in Germany and the USA: A cross-national comparative video study

, , , , &

References

  • van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2011). Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487–515. doi: 10.1080/09500691003649656
  • Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Fostering second graders’ scientific explanations: A beginning elementary teacher's knowledge, beliefs, and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 381–414. doi: 10.1080/10508400802222917
  • Biggers, M., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2013). Elementary teachers' curriculum design and pedagogical reasoning for supporting students' comparison and evaluation of evidence-based explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 48–72.
  • Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. doi: 10.1002/sce.20449
  • Brückmann, M., Duit, R., Tesch, M., Fischer, H., Kauertz, A., Reyer, T.,  … LaBudde, P. (2007). The potential of video studies in research on teaching and learning science. In R. Pintó and D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 77–89). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dalehefte, I., Rimmele, R., Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., Labudde, P., & Herweg, C. (2009). Observing instruction “next-door”: A video study about science teaching and learning in Germany and Switzerland. In T. Janík and T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 83–102). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
  • Forbes, C. T., Biggers, M., & Zangori, L. (2013). Investigating essential characteristics of scientific practices in elementary science learning environments: The Practices of Science Observation Protocol (P-SOP). School Science and Mathematics, 113(4), 180–190.
  • Gesellschaft für Didaktik des Sachunterrichts (Society for Teaching Natural and Social Sciences and Technology in Elementary School). (2013). Perspectives framework for general studies in primary education. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Glauert, E. B. (2009). How young children understand electric circuits: Predection, explanation, and exploration. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1025–1047. doi: 10.1080/09500690802101950
  • Goldring, R., Gray, L., & Bitterman, A. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey (NCES 2013–314). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S., & Palinscar, A. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(4), 455–505. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1304_1
  • Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307–325. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). Do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549. doi: 10.1002/tea.10035
  • Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M.,  … Vollmer, H. (2003). Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards [Regarding the development of National Education Standards]. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
  • Lan, X., Ponitz, C., Miller, K., Li, S., Cortina, K., Perry, M., & Fang, G. (2009). Keeping their attention: Classroom practices associated with behavioral engagement in first grade mathematics classes in China and the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(2), 198–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.03.002
  • Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., & Möller, K. (2009). Zusammenhänge zwischen PCK von Grundschullehrkräften und dem Verständnis naturwissenschaftlicher Konzepte bei Grundschülern [Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and students' learning gains: A multilevel analysis of elementary science classrooms]. In D. Höttecke (ed.), Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik: Chemie- und Physikdidaktik für die Lehramtsausbildung [Society for the teaching of chemistry and physics: Chemistry and physics education for teacher training] (pp. 404–406). Berlin: Lit.
  • Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., & Möller, K. (2012). Fachdidaktisches Wissen von Lehrkräften und multiple Ziele im Sachunterricht [Teachers pedagogical content knowledge and multiple outcome gains in elementary science classrooms]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft [Review of Education], 15, 55–75.
  • Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. doi: 10.1002/sce.21030
  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 771–792. doi: 10.1002/tea.20430
  • Metz, K. (2009). Elementary school teachers as “targets and agents of change”: Teachers’ learning in interaction with reform science curriculum. Science Education, 93(5), 915–954. doi: 10.1002/sce.20309
  • Metz, K. (2011). Disentangling robuse developmental constraints from the instructionally mutable: Young children's epistemic reasoning about a study of their own design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 50–110. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.529325
  • Möller, K. (2004). Naturwissenschaftliches Lernen in der Grundschule - Welche Kompetenzen brauchen Grundschullehrkräfte? [Elementary science teaching – what competencies do elementary teachers need?]. In H. Merkens (ed.), Lehrerbildung: IGLU und die Folgen [Teacher education: PIRLS and the consequences] (pp. 65–84). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Möller, K., Hardy, I., & Lange, K. (2012). Moving beyond standards: How can we improve elementary science learning? A German perspective. In S. Bernholt, K. Neumann, & P. Nentwig (Eds.), Making it tangible – learning outcomes in science education (pp. 31–54). Münster: Waxmann.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Leaning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: By states, for states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Neumann, K., Fischer, H., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to educational standards: The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545–563. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7
  • Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T.,  … Gallimore, R. (2006). Highlights from the TIMSS 1999 video study of eighth-grade science teaching (NCES 2006–17). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Santagata, R. (2005). Practices and beliefs in mistake-handling activities: A video study of Italian and US mathematics lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 491–508. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.004
  • Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 228–240. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.002
  • Stigler, J., Gallimore, R., & Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 87–100. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3502_3
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zangori, L., Forbes, C. T., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering student sense-making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers' use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 887–1017.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.