Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools

References

• Abd–El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation standards. Retrieved June 10, 2014, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 518–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 497–526.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L. (2000, May 31). South African curriculum for the twenty first century report of the review committee on Curriculum 2005. Presented to the minister of education, professor Kader Asmal, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post 1990 sub Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 17–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement. Pretoria: Government Printer Works.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (1997). Curriculum 2005: Lifelong learning for the 21st century. Pretoria: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2002). Revised national curriculum statement for grades R-9 (schools) natural sciences. Pretoria: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2008). Natural curriculum statement grades 10–12 (general) learning programme guidelines: Physical sciences. Pretoria: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Bristol: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudu, W. T. (2014). Exploring South African high school teachers’ conceptions of the nature of scientific inquiry: A case study. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dudu, W. T., & Vhurumuku, E. (2012). Teachers’ practices of inquiry when teaching investigations: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 579–600.
   Google Scholar
• Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1653–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, K. (1992). Crisis and challenge: Black education 1910–1990. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattingh, A., Aldous, C., & Rogan, J. M. (2007). Some factors influencing the quality of practical work in science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. D. (1999). Why outcomes based education will fail: An elaboration. In J. D. Jansen & P. Christie (Eds.), Changing curriculum: Studies on outcomes-based education in South-Africa (pp. 145–155). Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Antink, A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understanding about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Kim, B. S., & Ko, E. K. (2012). Teaching and learning of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Building capacity through systematic research-based professional development. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 125–151). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335–359). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2012). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science and Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1499–1521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mji, A., & Makgatho, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners’ poor performance: A spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African Journal of Education, 26, 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pretoria News. (2009, August 11). Numeracy, literacy shock at varsities. Pretoria News.
   Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U. (2010). A report card on learner autonomy in science investigations. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. (2006). Mathematics and science achievement at South African schools in TIMSS 2003. Cape Town: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V., Prinsloo, C., Visser, M., Arends, F., Winnaar, L., Rodgers, S.,  … , Mthethwa, M. (2012). Mathematics and science achievement of South African schools in TIMSS 2011. South Africa: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, J. M. (2004). Out of the frying pan … .? The implementation of Curriculum 2005. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(2), 610–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Spady, W. G. (1994). Choosing outcomes of significance. Educational Leadership, 51, 18–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunday Times. (2009, July 26). Set up to fail. Sunday Times.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2008). From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar