What Account of Science Shall We Give? A Case Study of Scientists Teaching First-year University Subjects

References

• Aslan, C. E., Pinsky, M. L., Ryan, M. E., Souther, S., & Terrell, K. A. (2014). Cultivating creativity in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 28(2), 345–353. doi:10.1111/cobi.12173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blades, D. W. (1994). Procedures of power and possibilities for change in science education curriculum-discourse. Edmonton: University of Edmonton.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, J. J. (2004). Changing strategies in science education. Science, 306(5694), 228–228. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5694.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2011). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, (Part B), 1–19. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, T. G. K. (2010). Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 591–612. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9266-6
   Google Scholar
• Correia, P. R. M., do Valle, B. X., Dazzani, M., & Infante-Malachias, M. E. (2010). The importance of scientific literacy in fostering education for sustainability: Theoretical considerations and preliminary findings from a Brazilian experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 678–685. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondston, J., Dawson, V., & Schibeci, R. (2010). Are students prepared to communicate? A case study of an Australian degree course in biotechnology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1091–1108. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9234-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Building theories from case study research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's handbook (pp. 5–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging scientific literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. doi: 10.1002/sce.20414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (1998). The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories. In D. A. Roberts & L. Ostman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 178–192). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (2013). The science curriculum; the decline of expertise and the rise of bureaucratise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 152–168. doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.737862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2003). Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics, Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. Retrieved from http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, J. (2002). Of cabbages and kings: Opening the hard shell of science curriculum policy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 59–66. doi: 10.1080/14926150209556499
   Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R. (2015). [School] science, the learner and the twenty-first century: What science? What learning? In R. P. Devadson, I. Zurida, & K. T. Ng (Eds.), Empowering the future generation through science education (pp. 15–33). Penang: SEAMEO-RECSAM.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. E. (1995). Access and the quality of learning the story of a curriculum document for school physics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Clayton, Victoria. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. E. (2001). Examining relations of power in a process of curriculum change: The case of VCE physics. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 525–551. doi: 10.1023/A:1013145924470
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310. doi: 10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Canberra: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Pfund, C., Pribbenow, C. M., & Handelsman, J. (2008). Scientific teaching in practice. Science, 322(5906), 1329–1330. doi: 10.1126/science.1166032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1999). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6453.html
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463. doi:10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riehle, C. F. (2012). Inciting curiosity and creating meaning: Teaching information evaluation through the lens of “Bad science”. Public Services Quarterly, 8(3), 227–234. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2012.702598
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. J. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy: The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 11–27). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from http://MONASH.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=592911
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S., Tytler, R., Darby, L., Hubber, P., Symington, D., & Edwards, J. (2007). The usefulness of a science degree: The “lost voices” of science trained professionals. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1411–1433. doi:10.1080/09500690601071909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, A. F., & Jude, B. A. (2014). Starting small: Using microbiology to foster scientific literacy. Trends in Microbiology. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. V. (2011). One brief, shining moment? The impact of neo-liberalism on science curriculum in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1273–1288. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. V., & Gunstone, R. F. (2009). Science curriculum in the market liberal society of the 21st century: ‘Re-visioning’ the idea of science for all. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9069-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B., & Miller, S. (2012). Policies and practices in supporting scientists' public communication through training. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 722–731. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2007). Re-Imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Australian Education Review. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). An inclusive view of scientific literacy: Core issues and future directions. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 176–192). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from http://MONASH.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=592911
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. (1998). Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be? Science, 282(5395), 1813–1814. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar