999
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Look into Students’ Retention of Acquired Nature of Science Understandings

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but … . Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215–233. doi: 10.1023/A:1016720417219
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
  • Akerson, V., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & Roth McDuffie, A. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 194–213. doi: 10.1002/tea.20099
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. The Journal of General Psychology, 66, 213–224. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1962.9711837
  • Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296–308. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296
  • Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.1
  • Bahrick, H. P. (2000). Long-term maintenance of knowledge. In E. Tulving & F. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 347–362). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 566–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012
  • Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563–581. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<563::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
  • Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., Dihoff, R. E., & Cook, M. L. (2006). Retention of Esperanto is affected by delay-interval task and item closure: A partial resolution of the delay-retention effect. The Psychological Record, 56, 597–615.
  • Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4/5), 514–527. doi: 10.1080/09541440701326097
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special issue), 514–529. doi: 10.1080/0950069890110504
  • Chow, A. F., Kelly, C., Woodford, K. C., & Maes, J. (2011). Deal or no deal: Using games to improve student learning, retention and decision-making. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), 259–264. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2010.519796
  • Conway, M. A., Cohen, G., & Stanhope, N. (1991). On the very long-term retention of knowledge acquired through formal education: Twelve years of cognitive psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 395–409. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.395
  • Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) Pan–Canadian Science Project. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12. Retrieved from http://204.225.6.243/science/framework/
  • Custers, E. (2010). Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(1), 109–128. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y
  • Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 309–330. doi: 10.1007/BF01320097
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Eikenberry, D. H. (1923). Permanence of high school learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 463–481. doi: 10.1037/h0073932
  • Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Du Preez, J. (2014). Long-term retention of basic mathematical knowledge and skills with engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 735–744. doi: 10.1080/03043790701520792
  • Gagne, E. D. (1978). Long-term retention of information following learning from prose. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 629–665. doi: 10.3102/00346543048004629
  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
  • Hofer, B. K. (2006). Domain specificity of personal epistemology: Resolved questions, persistent issues, new models. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.006
  • Kanive, R., Nelson, P., Burns, M., & Ysseldyke, J. (2014). Comparison of the effects of computer-based practice and conceptual understanding interventions on mathematics fact retention and generalization. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(2), 83–89. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2012.759405
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. doi: 10.1002/tea.10036
  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. doi: 10.1002/tea.20137
  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and understandings of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939–961. doi: 10.1080/09500690601110947
  • Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 470–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20230
  • Khishfe, R. (2012a). Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489–514. doi: 10.1002/tea.21012
  • Khishfe, R. (2012b). Transfer of nature of science understandings into similar contexts: Promises and possibilities of an explicit reflective approach. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2928–2953. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.672774
  • Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSG instruction project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 33–47. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660010112
  • Kohen, A. I., & Kipps, P. H. (1979). Factors determining student retention of economic knowledge after completing the principles-of-microeconomics course. The Journal of Economic Education, 10(2), 38–48. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1979.10845481
  • Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87(6), 831–848. doi: 10.1002/sce.10072
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290404
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034
  • Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730740207
  • Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267–1287. doi: 10.1080/09500690500439348
  • Liu, S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17905.x
  • Matić, L. J., & Dahl, B. (2014). Retention of differential and integral calculus: A case study of a university student in physical chemistry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(8), 1167–1187. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2014.920531
  • Matkins, J., & Bell, R. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 137–163. doi: 10.1007/s10972-006-9033-4
  • McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164. doi: 10.1002/tea.20377
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Ozden, M., & Gultekin, M. (2008). The effects of brain-based learning on academic achievement and retention of knowledge in science course. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1–17.
  • Powers, S. R. (1925). How long do students retain what they have learned from high school chemistry? Journal of Chemical Education, 2, 174–180. doi: 10.1021/ed002p174
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. doi: 10.1002/tea.20042
  • Sarikaya, M., Guven, E., Goksu, V., & Aka, E. (2010). The impact of constructivist approach on students’ academic achievement and retention of knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 9(1), 413–423. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It's the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236. doi: 10.1002/tea.10021
  • Scott, J. A. (1970). The effects on short- and long-term retention and on transfer of two methods of presenting selected geometry concepts. Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 044314).
  • Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 253–286. doi: 10.3102/00346543064002253
  • Semb, G. B., Ellis, J. A., & Araujo, J. (1993). Long-term memory of knowledge learned in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 305–316. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.305
  • Sinatra, G. M., Sountherland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528. doi: 10.1002/tea.10087
  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290408
  • Upadhyay, B., & DeFranco, C. (2008). Elementary students’ retention of environmental science knowledge: Connected science instruction versus direct instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 23–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03173668
  • Walker, A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410. doi: 10.1080/09500690601068095
  • Wang, Y., & Heffernan, N. (2014). The effect of automatic reassessment and relearning on assessing student long-term knowledge in mathematics. In S. Trausan-Matu, K. E. Boyer, M. Crosby, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 490–495). Springer International Publishing.
  • Xiong, X., & Beck, J. (2014). A study of exploring different schedules of spacing and retrieval interval on mathematics skills in ITS environment. In S. Trausan-Matu, K. E. Boyer, M. Crosby, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 504–509). Springer International Publishing.
  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343–367. doi: 10.1002/sce.10025

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.