Student Decision-Making about a Globally Familiar Socioscientific Issue: The value of sharing and comparing views with international counterparts

References

• Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352–377. doi: 10.1002/sce.10063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. (2011). Science education in Europe: National polices, practices and research. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Special Eurobarometer 295/Wave 68.2. Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. M. R., & Kellert, S. R. (1992). Public attitudes to whales: Results of a six-country survey. Edmonton: Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. doi: 10.1080/09500690701744595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M., & Hare, T. (2008). How conservation scientists work. School Science Review, 90(330), 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hamazaki, T., & Tanno, D. (2001). Approval of whaling and whaling-related beliefs: Public opinion in whaling and nonwhaling countries. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6, 131–144. doi: 10.1080/108712001317151967
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). Attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan and Germany. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 53–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00908.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310. doi: 10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170–177. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96, 787–807. doi: 10.1002/sce.21021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). The loss of biodiversity as a challenge for sustainable development: How do pupils in Chile and Germany perceive resource dilemmas? Research in Science Education, 39, 429–447. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, O., Tytler, R., Barraza, L., Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2013). Cross cultural exchange to support reasoning about socio-scientific sustainability issues. Teaching Science, 59(1), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• ORC International. (2014). Whaling study: United Kingdom and Germany. Retrieved May 9, 2015, from http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCoQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fuk.whales.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2014-whaling-survey-uk-germany.pdf&ei=bXVPVaXtJ8aP7AabtIGgAg&usg=AFQjCNGYyP1Es1E3VvpCYpB2t-tDa3xOqg&sig2=zHEcWn6lvLYZ39KjdJlCGg
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82(301), 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000072746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohner, R. P. (1984). Toward a concept of culture for cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 111–138. doi: 10.1177/0022002184015002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, K. (1995). Trends and current state of environmental education in Germany. In W. Bos & R. H. Lehmann (Eds.), Reflections on educational achievement (pp. 230–255). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students’ argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903–927. doi: 10.1080/09500690010016076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 657–687. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9141-x
   Google Scholar
• Solbrig, O. T. (1991). The roots of the biodiversity crisis. Biology International, 23, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé, M. (1995). The social siege of nature. In M. Soule & G. Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 137–170). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spellerberg, I. F. (1996). Conservation biology. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Shu-Sheng, L. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. doi: 10.1002/tea.21077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343–367. doi: 10.1002/sce.10025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar