1,219
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Country, School and Students Factors Associated with Extreme Levels of Science Literacy Across 25 Countries

&

References

  • Ahn, J., & Brewer, D. J. (2009). What do we know about reducing class and school size? In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), AERA handbook of education policy research (pp. 426–437). New York: Routledge.
  • Alivernini, F., Losito, B., & Palmerio, L. (2010). Le differenze nelle prestazioni degli studenti italiani. [The differences in Italian students’ achievements]. INVALSI, PISA 2006 e l'equità del sistema scolastico italiano. [PISA 2006 and equity in Italian education system]. Roma: Armando Editore.
  • Allore, H., Tinetti, M. E., Araujo, K. L. B., Hardy, S., & Peduzzi, P. (2005). A case study found that a regression tree outperformed multiple linear regression in predicting the relationship between impairments and social and productive activities scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(2), 154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.001
  • Basl, J. (2011). Effect of school on interest in natural sciences: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, and Norway based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 145–157. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518641
  • Beteille, T., & Loeb, S. (2009). Teacher quality and teacher labor markets. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), AERA handbook of education policy research (pp. 596–612). New York: Routledge.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science Engineering, 7, 271–285.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131
  • Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
  • Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
  • Chiu, M. M. (2007). Families, economies, cultures, and science achievement in 41 countries: Country-, school-, and student-level analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 510–519. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.510
  • Coertjens, L., Boeve-De Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Do schools make difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 497–522. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9200-0
  • Eagles, F. J., & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children's environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 33–37. doi: 10.1080/00958969909601882
  • Fabbris, L. (1997). Statistica multivariata: analisi esplorativa dei dati [Multivariate statistics: Exploratory data analysis]. Milano: McGraw Hill.
  • Fensham, P. J. (2000). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 2, 9–24. doi: 10.1080/14926150209556494
  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B
  • Garthwaite, K., France, B., & Ward, G. (2014). The complexity of scientific literacy: The development and use of a data analysis matrix. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1568–1587. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.870363
  • Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J., & Sofroniou, N. (2010). Equity in mathematics and science outcomes: Characteristics associated with high and low achievement on PISA 2006 in Ireland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 475–496. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2
  • Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., & Wingfield, L. C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2), 132–147. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366552
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1052–1078). North Holland: Amsterdam. doi:10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02018-6
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. NBER Working Paper Series, 15949, pp. 1–112.
  • Hill, N. E., & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 74–83. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.74
  • Ho, S. C. (2010). Family influences on science learning among Hong Kong adolescents: What we learned from PISA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 409–428. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9198-3
  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Imazeki, J. (2005). Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 431–449. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.014
  • International Labour Organisation (ILO). (1990). International standard classification of occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  • Koballa, T., Kemp, A., & Evans, R. (1997). The spectrum of scientific literacy. Science Teacher, 64(7), 27–31.
  • Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
  • Lam, T. Y. P., & Lau, K. C. (2014). Examining factors affecting science achievement of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 using Hierarchical linear modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.879223
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, B. J. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205–227. doi: 10.3102/01623737019003205
  • Lemon, S. C., Roy, J., Clark, M. A., Friedmann, P. D., & Rakowski, W. M. P. H. (2003). Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: Methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(3), 172–181. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_02
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 265–269. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.33.3.265
  • Loeb, S., & Page, M. E. (2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and non-pecuniary variation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 393–408. doi: 10.1162/003465300558894
  • Mayer, A., Nagengast, B., Fletcher, J., Steyer, R. (2014). Analyzing average and conditional effects with multigroup multilevel structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(304), 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00304/abstract
  • McConney, A., Oliver, M., Woods McConney, A., & Schibeci, R. (2011). Bridging the gap? A comparative, retrospective analysis of science literacy and interest in science for indigenous and non-indigenous Australian students. International Journal of Science Education, 33(14), 2017–2035. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.529477
  • McMillan, R. (2000). Competition, parental involvement, and public school performance. In National tax association proceedings.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006a). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy – a framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006b). Education at a glance 2006. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007a). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007b). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Education at a glance 2008. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Ozel, M., Caglak, S., & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.006
  • Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2010). Sex differences in science learning: Closing the gap through animations. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 271–275. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.003
  • Schneider, B., Wyse, A. E., & Keesler, V. (2006). Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 15–47. doi: 10.1353/pep.2007.0008
  • Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainier, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 105–121. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90019-5
  • Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 323–348. doi:10.1037/a0016973
  • Sun, L., Bradley, K. D., & Akers, K. (2012). A multilevel modelling approach to investigating factors impacting science achievement for secondary school students: PISA Hong Kong sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107–2125. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708063
  • Tomul, E., & Celik, K. (2009). The relationship between the students’ academics achievement and their socioeconomic level: Cross regional comparison. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1199–1204. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.216
  • UNESCO. (2006). International standard classification of education: ISCED 1997. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  • Williams, C. J., Lee, S. S., Fisher, R. A., & Dickerman, L. H. (1999). A comparison of statistical methods for prenatal screening for down syndrome. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 15, 89–101. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4025(199904/06)15:2<89::AID-ASMB366>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Woods McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for indigenous and non-indigenous students in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9265-y

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.