Discovering Plate Boundaries in Data-integrated Environments: Preservice Teachers' Conceptualization and Implementation of Scientific Practices

References

• Ault, C. R. (1998). Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 189–212. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<189::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211–221. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157–178. doi: 10.3102/00346543061002157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. Schewille, K., & Wickler, N. I. (2007, April 18). The use of video cases in inservice professional development: The STeLLA project. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, New Orleons, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Duncan, R. G., & Rinehart, R. W. (2014, June). Epistemic criteria: How far does general knowledge get you? In W. A. Sandoval (Discussant), The interplay of domain-specific and domain-general factors in scientific reasoning and argumentation. Symposium conduction at the meeting of International Conference of Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2009). College board standards for college success. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from https://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/cbscs-science-standards-2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Geology as an historical science: Its perception within science and the education system. Science & Education, 12, 197–211. doi: 10.1023/A:1023096001250
   Google Scholar
• Dott, R. H. (1998). “What is unique about geological reasoning?” GSA Today, 10(10), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2011, May). STEM education and the role of practices. In presentation given at the workshop of the committee on highly successful schools or programs for K-12 STEM education, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Dordrecht: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond nature of science: The case for reconceptualising ‘science’ for science education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, L. (2002). Using video to reflection on curriculum. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 72–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleer, M., & Pramling, N. (2014). A cultural-historical study of children learning science: Foregrounding affective imagination in play-based settings (Vol. 11). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. doi: 10.1002/sce.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107(8), 960–968. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis 2nd edition: A toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geological Society of America. (2011). The importance of teaching earth science position statement. Retrieved September 11, 2014, from http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, K., Zembal-Saul, C., & Starr, M. (2006). Evidence helps the KWL get a KLEW. Science and Children, 43(5), 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., & Daniel, B. (2007, April). Revolutionizing earth system science education for the 21st century, Report and recommendations from a 50-state analysis of earth science education standards. Cambridge MA: TERC.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T., Rabinowitz, M., & Craven III, J. A. (2003). Representation in teaching: Inferences from research of expert and novice teachers. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 235–247. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastens, K. (2010). Commentary: Object and spatial visualization in geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(2), 52–57. doi: 10.5408/1.3534847
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342. doi: 10.1002/sce.10024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDue, N. D., & Clark, S. K. (2012). Educator perspectives on Earth system science literacy: Challenges and priorities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(4), 372–383. doi: 10.5408/11-253.1
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Pritchard, C. (2002). Symbolizing space into being. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 59–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., & Downs, R. M. (1993). Understanding person-space-map relations: Cartographic and developmental perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 29, 739–752. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007a). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007b). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (2001). Plate tectonics: An insider's history of the modern theory of the Earth. Boulder, CO: Westview Preview.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved September 3, 2014, from www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=120
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L. (2012). Engaging students in the scientific practices of explanation and argumentation. Science Scope, 35(8), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, C. (1997). Pale blue dot: A vision of the human future in space (1994. Rpt). New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and instruction, 23(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, D. S., Henning, A. T., Shipp, S., & Dunbar, R. W. (2005). A data rich exercise for discovering plate boundary processes. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, D. L. (2012). It's time to stand up for earth science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(4), 291–294. doi: 10.5408/11-264.1
   Google Scholar
• Sezen, A. (2011). From the teacher's eyes: An ethnographic-case study on developing models of informal formative assessments (IFA) and understanding the challenges to effective implementation in science classrooms (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved June 25, 2011, from http://etda.libraries.psu.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Sezen-Barrie, A., Tran, M. D., McDonald, S. P., & Kelly, G. J. (2014). A cultural historical activity theory perspective to understand preservice science teachers’ reflections on and tensions during a microteaching experience. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 675–697. doi: 10.1007/s11422-013-9503-x
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher education, 13(3), 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2000). Viewing teaching on videotape. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 36–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A., & Bermea, S. B. (2012). Using students’ sketches to recognize alternative conceptions about plate tectonics persisting from prior instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(4), 350–359. doi: 10.5408/11-251.1
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Trend. (2009). Commentary: Fostering students’ argumentation skills in geoscience education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 224–232. doi: 10.5408/1.3559670
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey. (2012). Lesson 3: GeoSleuth murder mystery. Retrieved September 10, 2012, from http://education.usgs.gov/lessons/schoolyard/GeoSleuth.html
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?. Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of ‘inquiry’: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481–512. doi: 10.1002/tea.20010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2009, February). Cultivating 21st century skills in science learners: How systems of teacher preparation and professional development will have to evolve. In presentation given at the National Academies of Science Workshop on 21st Century Skills, Washington, DC (Vol. 15).
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2009). The beginner's repertoire: Proposing a core set of instructional practices for teacher preparation. In NSF DR-K12 meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 437–463. doi: 10.1023/A:1022411822951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar